Cargando…

Winning the war against ICU-acquired weakness: new innovations in nutrition and exercise physiology

Over the last 10 years we have significantly reduced hospital mortality from sepsis and critical illness. However, the evidence reveals that over the same period we have tripled the number of patients being sent to rehabilitation settings. Further, given that as many as half of the deaths in the fir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wischmeyer, Paul E, San-Millan, Inigo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4699141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26728966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc14724
_version_ 1782408146658000896
author Wischmeyer, Paul E
San-Millan, Inigo
author_facet Wischmeyer, Paul E
San-Millan, Inigo
author_sort Wischmeyer, Paul E
collection PubMed
description Over the last 10 years we have significantly reduced hospital mortality from sepsis and critical illness. However, the evidence reveals that over the same period we have tripled the number of patients being sent to rehabilitation settings. Further, given that as many as half of the deaths in the first year following ICU admission occur post ICU discharge, it is unclear how many of these patients ever returned home. For those who do survive, the latest data indicate that 50-70% of ICU "survivors" will suffer cognitive impairment and 60-80% of "survivors" will suffer functional impairment or ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW). These observations demand that we as intensive care providers ask the following questions: "Are we creating survivors ... or are we creating victims?" and "Do we accomplish 'Pyrrhic Victories' in the ICU?" Interventions to address ICU-AW must have a renewed focus on optimal nutrition, anabolic/anticatabolic strategies, and in the future employ the personalized muscle and exercise evaluation techniques utilized by elite athletes to optimize performance. Specifically, strategies must include optimal protein delivery (1.2-2.0 g/kg/day), as an athlete would routinely employ. However, as is clear in elite sports performance, optimal nutrition is fundamental but alone is often not enough. We know burn patients can remain catabolic for 2 years post burn; thus, anticatabolic agents (i.e., beta-blockers) and anabolic agents (i.e., oxandrolone) will probably also be essential. In the near future, evaluation techniques such as assessing lean body mass at the bedside using ultrasound to determine nutritional status and ultrasound-measured muscle glycogen as a marker of muscle injury and recovery could be utilized to help find the transition from the acute phase of critical illness to the recovery phase. Finally, exercise physiology testing that evaluates muscle substrate utilization during exercise can be used to diagnose muscle mitochondrial dysfunction and to guide a personalized ideal heart rate, assisting in recovery of muscle mitochondrial function and functional endurance post ICU. In the end, future ICU-AW research must focus on using a combination of modern performance-enhancing nutrition, anticatabolic/anabolic interventions, and muscle/exercise testing so we can begin to create more "survivors" and fewer victims post ICU care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4699141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46991412016-01-13 Winning the war against ICU-acquired weakness: new innovations in nutrition and exercise physiology Wischmeyer, Paul E San-Millan, Inigo Crit Care Review Over the last 10 years we have significantly reduced hospital mortality from sepsis and critical illness. However, the evidence reveals that over the same period we have tripled the number of patients being sent to rehabilitation settings. Further, given that as many as half of the deaths in the first year following ICU admission occur post ICU discharge, it is unclear how many of these patients ever returned home. For those who do survive, the latest data indicate that 50-70% of ICU "survivors" will suffer cognitive impairment and 60-80% of "survivors" will suffer functional impairment or ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW). These observations demand that we as intensive care providers ask the following questions: "Are we creating survivors ... or are we creating victims?" and "Do we accomplish 'Pyrrhic Victories' in the ICU?" Interventions to address ICU-AW must have a renewed focus on optimal nutrition, anabolic/anticatabolic strategies, and in the future employ the personalized muscle and exercise evaluation techniques utilized by elite athletes to optimize performance. Specifically, strategies must include optimal protein delivery (1.2-2.0 g/kg/day), as an athlete would routinely employ. However, as is clear in elite sports performance, optimal nutrition is fundamental but alone is often not enough. We know burn patients can remain catabolic for 2 years post burn; thus, anticatabolic agents (i.e., beta-blockers) and anabolic agents (i.e., oxandrolone) will probably also be essential. In the near future, evaluation techniques such as assessing lean body mass at the bedside using ultrasound to determine nutritional status and ultrasound-measured muscle glycogen as a marker of muscle injury and recovery could be utilized to help find the transition from the acute phase of critical illness to the recovery phase. Finally, exercise physiology testing that evaluates muscle substrate utilization during exercise can be used to diagnose muscle mitochondrial dysfunction and to guide a personalized ideal heart rate, assisting in recovery of muscle mitochondrial function and functional endurance post ICU. In the end, future ICU-AW research must focus on using a combination of modern performance-enhancing nutrition, anticatabolic/anabolic interventions, and muscle/exercise testing so we can begin to create more "survivors" and fewer victims post ICU care. BioMed Central 2015 2015-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4699141/ /pubmed/26728966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc14724 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wischmeyer and San-Millan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Wischmeyer, Paul E
San-Millan, Inigo
Winning the war against ICU-acquired weakness: new innovations in nutrition and exercise physiology
title Winning the war against ICU-acquired weakness: new innovations in nutrition and exercise physiology
title_full Winning the war against ICU-acquired weakness: new innovations in nutrition and exercise physiology
title_fullStr Winning the war against ICU-acquired weakness: new innovations in nutrition and exercise physiology
title_full_unstemmed Winning the war against ICU-acquired weakness: new innovations in nutrition and exercise physiology
title_short Winning the war against ICU-acquired weakness: new innovations in nutrition and exercise physiology
title_sort winning the war against icu-acquired weakness: new innovations in nutrition and exercise physiology
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4699141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26728966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc14724
work_keys_str_mv AT wischmeyerpaule winningthewaragainsticuacquiredweaknessnewinnovationsinnutritionandexercisephysiology
AT sanmillaninigo winningthewaragainsticuacquiredweaknessnewinnovationsinnutritionandexercisephysiology