Cargando…

Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab plus Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone to Treat Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

PURPOSE: Results from previous randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating whether the addition of bevacizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) could statistically significantly increase the pathological complete response (pCR) and to identify which subgroup would benefit most from such regim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Li, Yao, Guang-yu, Liu, Min-feng, Chen, Lu-jia, Hu, Xiao-lei, Ye, Chang-sheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4699216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26717149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145442
_version_ 1782408158625398784
author Cao, Li
Yao, Guang-yu
Liu, Min-feng
Chen, Lu-jia
Hu, Xiao-lei
Ye, Chang-sheng
author_facet Cao, Li
Yao, Guang-yu
Liu, Min-feng
Chen, Lu-jia
Hu, Xiao-lei
Ye, Chang-sheng
author_sort Cao, Li
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Results from previous randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating whether the addition of bevacizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) could statistically significantly increase the pathological complete response (pCR) and to identify which subgroup would benefit most from such regimens have produced conflicting results. This meta-analysis was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in the neoadjuvant setting. METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library was performed to identify eligible studies. The primary endpoint of interest was pCR. The secondary endpoints were clinical complete rate (cCR), surgery rate, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) rate, and toxicity. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software version 5.3. RESULTS: Nine RCTs matched the selection criteria, yielding a total of 4967 patients (bevacizumab plus chemotherapy: 50.1%, chemotherapy alone: 49.9%). The results of this meta-analysis demonstrated that the addition of bevacizumab to NAC significantly increased the pCR rate (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34 [1.18–1.54]; P < 0.0001) compared with chemotherapy alone. Subgroup analysis showed that the effect of bevacizumab was more pronounced in patients with HER2-negative cancer (OR = 1.34 [1.17–1.54]; P < 0.0001) compared with HER2-positive cancer (OR = 1.69 [0.90–3.20]; P = 0.11). Similarly, in patients with HER2-negative cancer, the effect of bevacizumab was also more pronounced in patients with HR-negative cancer (OR = 1.38 [1.09–1.74]; P = 0.007) compared with HR-positive cancer (OR = 1.36 [0.78–2.35]; P = 0.27). No significant differences were observed between the groups with respect to cCR, surgery rate, or BCS rate. Additionally bevacizumab was associated with a higher incidence of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and hand–foot syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Higher proportions of patients achieved pCR when bevacizumab was added to NAC compared with when they received chemotherapy alone; acceptable toxicities were also found. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with histologically confirmed HER2-negative and HR-negative breast cancer benefited the most.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4699216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46992162016-01-14 Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab plus Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone to Treat Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Cao, Li Yao, Guang-yu Liu, Min-feng Chen, Lu-jia Hu, Xiao-lei Ye, Chang-sheng PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Results from previous randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating whether the addition of bevacizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) could statistically significantly increase the pathological complete response (pCR) and to identify which subgroup would benefit most from such regimens have produced conflicting results. This meta-analysis was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in the neoadjuvant setting. METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library was performed to identify eligible studies. The primary endpoint of interest was pCR. The secondary endpoints were clinical complete rate (cCR), surgery rate, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) rate, and toxicity. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software version 5.3. RESULTS: Nine RCTs matched the selection criteria, yielding a total of 4967 patients (bevacizumab plus chemotherapy: 50.1%, chemotherapy alone: 49.9%). The results of this meta-analysis demonstrated that the addition of bevacizumab to NAC significantly increased the pCR rate (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34 [1.18–1.54]; P < 0.0001) compared with chemotherapy alone. Subgroup analysis showed that the effect of bevacizumab was more pronounced in patients with HER2-negative cancer (OR = 1.34 [1.17–1.54]; P < 0.0001) compared with HER2-positive cancer (OR = 1.69 [0.90–3.20]; P = 0.11). Similarly, in patients with HER2-negative cancer, the effect of bevacizumab was also more pronounced in patients with HR-negative cancer (OR = 1.38 [1.09–1.74]; P = 0.007) compared with HR-positive cancer (OR = 1.36 [0.78–2.35]; P = 0.27). No significant differences were observed between the groups with respect to cCR, surgery rate, or BCS rate. Additionally bevacizumab was associated with a higher incidence of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and hand–foot syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Higher proportions of patients achieved pCR when bevacizumab was added to NAC compared with when they received chemotherapy alone; acceptable toxicities were also found. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with histologically confirmed HER2-negative and HR-negative breast cancer benefited the most. Public Library of Science 2015-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4699216/ /pubmed/26717149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145442 Text en © 2015 Cao et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cao, Li
Yao, Guang-yu
Liu, Min-feng
Chen, Lu-jia
Hu, Xiao-lei
Ye, Chang-sheng
Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab plus Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone to Treat Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
title Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab plus Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone to Treat Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
title_full Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab plus Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone to Treat Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab plus Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone to Treat Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab plus Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone to Treat Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
title_short Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab plus Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone to Treat Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
title_sort neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone to treat non-metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4699216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26717149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145442
work_keys_str_mv AT caoli neoadjuvantbevacizumabpluschemotherapyversuschemotherapyalonetotreatnonmetastaticbreastcancerametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT yaoguangyu neoadjuvantbevacizumabpluschemotherapyversuschemotherapyalonetotreatnonmetastaticbreastcancerametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT liuminfeng neoadjuvantbevacizumabpluschemotherapyversuschemotherapyalonetotreatnonmetastaticbreastcancerametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT chenlujia neoadjuvantbevacizumabpluschemotherapyversuschemotherapyalonetotreatnonmetastaticbreastcancerametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT huxiaolei neoadjuvantbevacizumabpluschemotherapyversuschemotherapyalonetotreatnonmetastaticbreastcancerametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT yechangsheng neoadjuvantbevacizumabpluschemotherapyversuschemotherapyalonetotreatnonmetastaticbreastcancerametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials