Cargando…

Radiobasilic Versus Brachiobasilic Transposition on the Upper Arm to Avoid Steal Syndrome

BACKGROUND: Although the proximal radial artery has been reported as an alternative inflow to prevent steal syndrome, brachiobasilic fistula has been reported to be associated with steal syndrome in 10–20% of cases. We aimed to compare proximal radiobasilic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) with brachioba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karaca, Okay Guven, Basal, Ahmet Nihat, Ecevit, Ata Niyazi, Kalender, Mehmet, Darcin, Osman Tansel, Sungur, Mehmet Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4699624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26713498
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.896642
_version_ 1782408201211215872
author Karaca, Okay Guven
Basal, Ahmet Nihat
Ecevit, Ata Niyazi
Kalender, Mehmet
Darcin, Osman Tansel
Sungur, Mehmet Ali
author_facet Karaca, Okay Guven
Basal, Ahmet Nihat
Ecevit, Ata Niyazi
Kalender, Mehmet
Darcin, Osman Tansel
Sungur, Mehmet Ali
author_sort Karaca, Okay Guven
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the proximal radial artery has been reported as an alternative inflow to prevent steal syndrome, brachiobasilic fistula has been reported to be associated with steal syndrome in 10–20% of cases. We aimed to compare proximal radiobasilic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) with brachiobasilic AVFs on the upper arm in terms of steal syndrome and outcomes. MATERIAL/METHOD: We used our institutional operative record database to identify 94 patients in whom brachiobasilic AVF (n=40) and radiobasilic AVF (n=54) were placed between January 2009 and December 2013. Postoperative complications such as steal syndrome, venous hypertension, and aneurysm were recorded. RESULTS: Steal syndrome was determined to occur less frequently in the radiobasilic AVF group (0% vs. 10%, P=0.03). The rates of other complications (bleeding, aneurysm, venous hypertension) between the 2 groups were similar, as were the patency rates. CONCLUSIONS: Radiobasilic AVF was effective in reducing steal syndrome, with similar early and late outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4699624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46996242016-01-13 Radiobasilic Versus Brachiobasilic Transposition on the Upper Arm to Avoid Steal Syndrome Karaca, Okay Guven Basal, Ahmet Nihat Ecevit, Ata Niyazi Kalender, Mehmet Darcin, Osman Tansel Sungur, Mehmet Ali Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Although the proximal radial artery has been reported as an alternative inflow to prevent steal syndrome, brachiobasilic fistula has been reported to be associated with steal syndrome in 10–20% of cases. We aimed to compare proximal radiobasilic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) with brachiobasilic AVFs on the upper arm in terms of steal syndrome and outcomes. MATERIAL/METHOD: We used our institutional operative record database to identify 94 patients in whom brachiobasilic AVF (n=40) and radiobasilic AVF (n=54) were placed between January 2009 and December 2013. Postoperative complications such as steal syndrome, venous hypertension, and aneurysm were recorded. RESULTS: Steal syndrome was determined to occur less frequently in the radiobasilic AVF group (0% vs. 10%, P=0.03). The rates of other complications (bleeding, aneurysm, venous hypertension) between the 2 groups were similar, as were the patency rates. CONCLUSIONS: Radiobasilic AVF was effective in reducing steal syndrome, with similar early and late outcomes. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4699624/ /pubmed/26713498 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.896642 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Karaca, Okay Guven
Basal, Ahmet Nihat
Ecevit, Ata Niyazi
Kalender, Mehmet
Darcin, Osman Tansel
Sungur, Mehmet Ali
Radiobasilic Versus Brachiobasilic Transposition on the Upper Arm to Avoid Steal Syndrome
title Radiobasilic Versus Brachiobasilic Transposition on the Upper Arm to Avoid Steal Syndrome
title_full Radiobasilic Versus Brachiobasilic Transposition on the Upper Arm to Avoid Steal Syndrome
title_fullStr Radiobasilic Versus Brachiobasilic Transposition on the Upper Arm to Avoid Steal Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Radiobasilic Versus Brachiobasilic Transposition on the Upper Arm to Avoid Steal Syndrome
title_short Radiobasilic Versus Brachiobasilic Transposition on the Upper Arm to Avoid Steal Syndrome
title_sort radiobasilic versus brachiobasilic transposition on the upper arm to avoid steal syndrome
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4699624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26713498
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.896642
work_keys_str_mv AT karacaokayguven radiobasilicversusbrachiobasilictranspositionontheupperarmtoavoidstealsyndrome
AT basalahmetnihat radiobasilicversusbrachiobasilictranspositionontheupperarmtoavoidstealsyndrome
AT ecevitataniyazi radiobasilicversusbrachiobasilictranspositionontheupperarmtoavoidstealsyndrome
AT kalendermehmet radiobasilicversusbrachiobasilictranspositionontheupperarmtoavoidstealsyndrome
AT darcinosmantansel radiobasilicversusbrachiobasilictranspositionontheupperarmtoavoidstealsyndrome
AT sungurmehmetali radiobasilicversusbrachiobasilictranspositionontheupperarmtoavoidstealsyndrome