Cargando…
Clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation
Contamination of perfusion fluid (PF) could lead to serious infections in kidney transplant recipients. Preemptive therapy (PE-T) in case of yeast contamination of PF is mandatory. The usefulness of PE-T in presence of bacteria remains unclear. In this study we evaluated the incidence of PF bacteria...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1658-3 |
_version_ | 1782408258124775424 |
---|---|
author | Ranghino, A. Diena, D. Simonato, F. Messina, M. Burdese, M. Piraina, V. Fop, F. Segoloni, G. P. Biancone, L. |
author_facet | Ranghino, A. Diena, D. Simonato, F. Messina, M. Burdese, M. Piraina, V. Fop, F. Segoloni, G. P. Biancone, L. |
author_sort | Ranghino, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Contamination of perfusion fluid (PF) could lead to serious infections in kidney transplant recipients. Preemptive therapy (PE-T) in case of yeast contamination of PF is mandatory. The usefulness of PE-T in presence of bacteria remains unclear. In this study we evaluated the incidence of PF bacterial contamination and the impact of PE-T on clinical outcome. Microbiological data of 290 PF and clinical data of the corresponding recipients collected in our hospital from January 2010 and December 2012 were analyzed. Recipients with bacterial contaminated PF (101) were divided in 3 groups: group 1 (n = 52) PE-T treated bacteria resistant to perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP), group 2 (n = 28) bacteria sensitive to PAP, group 3 (n = 21) PE-T-untreated bacteria resistant to PAP. Incidence of positive PF was 34.8 %, 50.4 % staphylococci, 9.9 % C. albicans. No significant differences in the rate of PF-related infections between the three groups were found. In conclusion, although PF contamination is frequent, the incidence of PF-related infections is very low. In addition, in this study PE-T did not help to reduce the rate of PF-related infection suggesting that a resonable reduction in the use of antibiotic terapy could be made. However, waiting for largest and prospective clinical trials to confirm our findings, a closely clinical and microbiologic monitoring of the recipient is highly recommended in case of PF contamination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4700024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47000242016-01-12 Clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation Ranghino, A. Diena, D. Simonato, F. Messina, M. Burdese, M. Piraina, V. Fop, F. Segoloni, G. P. Biancone, L. Springerplus Research Contamination of perfusion fluid (PF) could lead to serious infections in kidney transplant recipients. Preemptive therapy (PE-T) in case of yeast contamination of PF is mandatory. The usefulness of PE-T in presence of bacteria remains unclear. In this study we evaluated the incidence of PF bacterial contamination and the impact of PE-T on clinical outcome. Microbiological data of 290 PF and clinical data of the corresponding recipients collected in our hospital from January 2010 and December 2012 were analyzed. Recipients with bacterial contaminated PF (101) were divided in 3 groups: group 1 (n = 52) PE-T treated bacteria resistant to perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP), group 2 (n = 28) bacteria sensitive to PAP, group 3 (n = 21) PE-T-untreated bacteria resistant to PAP. Incidence of positive PF was 34.8 %, 50.4 % staphylococci, 9.9 % C. albicans. No significant differences in the rate of PF-related infections between the three groups were found. In conclusion, although PF contamination is frequent, the incidence of PF-related infections is very low. In addition, in this study PE-T did not help to reduce the rate of PF-related infection suggesting that a resonable reduction in the use of antibiotic terapy could be made. However, waiting for largest and prospective clinical trials to confirm our findings, a closely clinical and microbiologic monitoring of the recipient is highly recommended in case of PF contamination. Springer International Publishing 2016-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4700024/ /pubmed/26759746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1658-3 Text en © Ranghino et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Ranghino, A. Diena, D. Simonato, F. Messina, M. Burdese, M. Piraina, V. Fop, F. Segoloni, G. P. Biancone, L. Clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation |
title | Clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation |
title_full | Clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation |
title_fullStr | Clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation |
title_short | Clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation |
title_sort | clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1658-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ranghinoa clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation AT dienad clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation AT simonatof clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation AT messinam clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation AT burdesem clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation AT pirainav clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation AT fopf clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation AT segolonigp clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation AT bianconel clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation |