Cargando…

Clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation

Contamination of perfusion fluid (PF) could lead to serious infections in kidney transplant recipients. Preemptive therapy (PE-T) in case of yeast contamination of PF is mandatory. The usefulness of PE-T in presence of bacteria remains unclear. In this study we evaluated the incidence of PF bacteria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ranghino, A., Diena, D., Simonato, F., Messina, M., Burdese, M., Piraina, V., Fop, F., Segoloni, G. P., Biancone, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1658-3
_version_ 1782408258124775424
author Ranghino, A.
Diena, D.
Simonato, F.
Messina, M.
Burdese, M.
Piraina, V.
Fop, F.
Segoloni, G. P.
Biancone, L.
author_facet Ranghino, A.
Diena, D.
Simonato, F.
Messina, M.
Burdese, M.
Piraina, V.
Fop, F.
Segoloni, G. P.
Biancone, L.
author_sort Ranghino, A.
collection PubMed
description Contamination of perfusion fluid (PF) could lead to serious infections in kidney transplant recipients. Preemptive therapy (PE-T) in case of yeast contamination of PF is mandatory. The usefulness of PE-T in presence of bacteria remains unclear. In this study we evaluated the incidence of PF bacterial contamination and the impact of PE-T on clinical outcome. Microbiological data of 290 PF and clinical data of the corresponding recipients collected in our hospital from January 2010 and December 2012 were analyzed. Recipients with bacterial contaminated PF (101) were divided in 3 groups: group 1 (n = 52) PE-T treated bacteria resistant to perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP), group 2 (n = 28) bacteria sensitive to PAP, group 3 (n = 21) PE-T-untreated bacteria resistant to PAP. Incidence of positive PF was 34.8 %, 50.4 % staphylococci, 9.9 % C. albicans. No significant differences in the rate of PF-related infections between the three groups were found. In conclusion, although PF contamination is frequent, the incidence of PF-related infections is very low. In addition, in this study PE-T did not help to reduce the rate of PF-related infection suggesting that a resonable reduction in the use of antibiotic terapy could be made. However, waiting for largest and prospective clinical trials to confirm our findings, a closely clinical and microbiologic monitoring of the recipient is highly recommended in case of PF contamination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4700024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47000242016-01-12 Clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation Ranghino, A. Diena, D. Simonato, F. Messina, M. Burdese, M. Piraina, V. Fop, F. Segoloni, G. P. Biancone, L. Springerplus Research Contamination of perfusion fluid (PF) could lead to serious infections in kidney transplant recipients. Preemptive therapy (PE-T) in case of yeast contamination of PF is mandatory. The usefulness of PE-T in presence of bacteria remains unclear. In this study we evaluated the incidence of PF bacterial contamination and the impact of PE-T on clinical outcome. Microbiological data of 290 PF and clinical data of the corresponding recipients collected in our hospital from January 2010 and December 2012 were analyzed. Recipients with bacterial contaminated PF (101) were divided in 3 groups: group 1 (n = 52) PE-T treated bacteria resistant to perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP), group 2 (n = 28) bacteria sensitive to PAP, group 3 (n = 21) PE-T-untreated bacteria resistant to PAP. Incidence of positive PF was 34.8 %, 50.4 % staphylococci, 9.9 % C. albicans. No significant differences in the rate of PF-related infections between the three groups were found. In conclusion, although PF contamination is frequent, the incidence of PF-related infections is very low. In addition, in this study PE-T did not help to reduce the rate of PF-related infection suggesting that a resonable reduction in the use of antibiotic terapy could be made. However, waiting for largest and prospective clinical trials to confirm our findings, a closely clinical and microbiologic monitoring of the recipient is highly recommended in case of PF contamination. Springer International Publishing 2016-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4700024/ /pubmed/26759746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1658-3 Text en © Ranghino et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Ranghino, A.
Diena, D.
Simonato, F.
Messina, M.
Burdese, M.
Piraina, V.
Fop, F.
Segoloni, G. P.
Biancone, L.
Clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation
title Clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation
title_full Clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation
title_fullStr Clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation
title_short Clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation
title_sort clinical impact of bacterial contamination of perfusion fluid in kidney transplantation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1658-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ranghinoa clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation
AT dienad clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation
AT simonatof clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation
AT messinam clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation
AT burdesem clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation
AT pirainav clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation
AT fopf clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation
AT segolonigp clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation
AT bianconel clinicalimpactofbacterialcontaminationofperfusionfluidinkidneytransplantation