Cargando…
Staging of Primary Abdominal Lymphomas: Comparison of Whole-Body MRI with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT
Background. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequences (WB-DW-MRI) with that of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in the staging of patients with primary gastrointestinal lymphoma. Methods. This retrospective study involved 17 untreated patients with pri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26798331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/104794 |
_version_ | 1782408285057449984 |
---|---|
author | Stecco, Alessandro Buemi, Francesco Quagliozzi, Martina Lombardi, Mariangela Santagostino, Alberto Sacchetti, Gian Mauro Carriero, Alessandro |
author_facet | Stecco, Alessandro Buemi, Francesco Quagliozzi, Martina Lombardi, Mariangela Santagostino, Alberto Sacchetti, Gian Mauro Carriero, Alessandro |
author_sort | Stecco, Alessandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequences (WB-DW-MRI) with that of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in the staging of patients with primary gastrointestinal lymphoma. Methods. This retrospective study involved 17 untreated patients with primary abdominal gastrointestinal lymphoma. All patients underwent (18)F-FDG-PET/CT and WB-DW-MRI. Histopathology findings or at least 6 months of clinical and radiological follow-up was the gold standard. The Musshoff-modified Ann Arbor system was used for staging, and diagnostic accuracy was evaluated on a per-node basis. Results. WB-DW-MRI exhibited 100% sensitivity, 96.3% specificity, and 96.1% and 100% positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and PPV and NPV of PET/CT were 95.9%, 100%, and 100% and 96.4%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two techniques (p = 0.05). The weighted kappa agreement statistics with a 95% confidence interval were 0.97 (0.95–0.99) between the two MRI readers and 0.87 (0.82–0.92) between the two methods. Conclusions. WB-DW-MRI appears to have a comparable diagnostic value to (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in staging patients with gastrointestinal lymphoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4700158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47001582016-01-21 Staging of Primary Abdominal Lymphomas: Comparison of Whole-Body MRI with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT Stecco, Alessandro Buemi, Francesco Quagliozzi, Martina Lombardi, Mariangela Santagostino, Alberto Sacchetti, Gian Mauro Carriero, Alessandro Gastroenterol Res Pract Clinical Study Background. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequences (WB-DW-MRI) with that of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in the staging of patients with primary gastrointestinal lymphoma. Methods. This retrospective study involved 17 untreated patients with primary abdominal gastrointestinal lymphoma. All patients underwent (18)F-FDG-PET/CT and WB-DW-MRI. Histopathology findings or at least 6 months of clinical and radiological follow-up was the gold standard. The Musshoff-modified Ann Arbor system was used for staging, and diagnostic accuracy was evaluated on a per-node basis. Results. WB-DW-MRI exhibited 100% sensitivity, 96.3% specificity, and 96.1% and 100% positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and PPV and NPV of PET/CT were 95.9%, 100%, and 100% and 96.4%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two techniques (p = 0.05). The weighted kappa agreement statistics with a 95% confidence interval were 0.97 (0.95–0.99) between the two MRI readers and 0.87 (0.82–0.92) between the two methods. Conclusions. WB-DW-MRI appears to have a comparable diagnostic value to (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in staging patients with gastrointestinal lymphoma. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4700158/ /pubmed/26798331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/104794 Text en Copyright © 2015 Alessandro Stecco et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Stecco, Alessandro Buemi, Francesco Quagliozzi, Martina Lombardi, Mariangela Santagostino, Alberto Sacchetti, Gian Mauro Carriero, Alessandro Staging of Primary Abdominal Lymphomas: Comparison of Whole-Body MRI with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT |
title | Staging of Primary Abdominal Lymphomas: Comparison of Whole-Body MRI with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT |
title_full | Staging of Primary Abdominal Lymphomas: Comparison of Whole-Body MRI with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT |
title_fullStr | Staging of Primary Abdominal Lymphomas: Comparison of Whole-Body MRI with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT |
title_full_unstemmed | Staging of Primary Abdominal Lymphomas: Comparison of Whole-Body MRI with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT |
title_short | Staging of Primary Abdominal Lymphomas: Comparison of Whole-Body MRI with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT |
title_sort | staging of primary abdominal lymphomas: comparison of whole-body mri with diffusion-weighted imaging and (18)f-fdg-pet/ct |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26798331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/104794 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steccoalessandro stagingofprimaryabdominallymphomascomparisonofwholebodymriwithdiffusionweightedimagingand18ffdgpetct AT buemifrancesco stagingofprimaryabdominallymphomascomparisonofwholebodymriwithdiffusionweightedimagingand18ffdgpetct AT quagliozzimartina stagingofprimaryabdominallymphomascomparisonofwholebodymriwithdiffusionweightedimagingand18ffdgpetct AT lombardimariangela stagingofprimaryabdominallymphomascomparisonofwholebodymriwithdiffusionweightedimagingand18ffdgpetct AT santagostinoalberto stagingofprimaryabdominallymphomascomparisonofwholebodymriwithdiffusionweightedimagingand18ffdgpetct AT sacchettigianmauro stagingofprimaryabdominallymphomascomparisonofwholebodymriwithdiffusionweightedimagingand18ffdgpetct AT carrieroalessandro stagingofprimaryabdominallymphomascomparisonofwholebodymriwithdiffusionweightedimagingand18ffdgpetct |