Cargando…

The Effects of Repeat Testing, Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on Computerized Measures of Visuospatial Memory Span

Spatial span tests (SSTs) such as the Corsi Block Test (CBT) and the SST of the Wechsler Memory Scale are widely used to assess deficits in spatial working memory. We conducted three experiments to evaluate the test–retest reliability and clinical sensitivity of a new computerized spatial span test...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woods, David L., Wyma, John M., Herron, Timothy J., Yund, E. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26779001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00690
_version_ 1782408301913309184
author Woods, David L.
Wyma, John M.
Herron, Timothy J.
Yund, E. W.
author_facet Woods, David L.
Wyma, John M.
Herron, Timothy J.
Yund, E. W.
author_sort Woods, David L.
collection PubMed
description Spatial span tests (SSTs) such as the Corsi Block Test (CBT) and the SST of the Wechsler Memory Scale are widely used to assess deficits in spatial working memory. We conducted three experiments to evaluate the test–retest reliability and clinical sensitivity of a new computerized spatial span test (C-SST) that incorporates psychophysical methods to improve the precision of spatial span measurement. In Experiment 1, we analyzed C-SST test–retest reliability in 49 participants who underwent three test sessions at weekly intervals. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were higher for a psychophysically derived mean span (MnS) metric (0.83) than for the maximal span and total correct metrics used in traditional spatial-span tests. Response times (ReTs) also showed high ICCs (0.93) that correlated negatively with MnS scores and correlated positively with response-time latencies from other tests of processing speed. Learning effects were insignificant. Experiment 2 examined the performance of Experiment 1 participants when instructed to feign symptoms of traumatic brain injury (TBI): 57% showed abnormal MnS z-scores. A MnS z-score cutoff of 3.0 correctly classified 36% of simulated malingerers and 91% of the subgroup of 11 control participants with abnormal spans. Malingerers also made more substitution errors than control participants with abnormal spans (sensitivity = 43%, specificity = 91%). In addition, malingerers showed no evidence of ReT slowing, in contrast to significant abnormalities seen on other malingered tests of processing speed. As a result, differences between ReT z-scores and z-scores on other processing speed tests showed very high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing malingering and control participants with either normal or abnormal spans. Experiment 3 examined C-SST performance in a group of patients with predominantly mild TBI: neither MnS nor ReT z-scores showed significant group-level abnormalities. The C-SST improves the reliability and sensitivity of spatial span testing, can accurately detect malingering, and shows that visuospatial working memory is largely preserved in patients with predominantly mild TBI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4700270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47002702016-01-15 The Effects of Repeat Testing, Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on Computerized Measures of Visuospatial Memory Span Woods, David L. Wyma, John M. Herron, Timothy J. Yund, E. W. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Spatial span tests (SSTs) such as the Corsi Block Test (CBT) and the SST of the Wechsler Memory Scale are widely used to assess deficits in spatial working memory. We conducted three experiments to evaluate the test–retest reliability and clinical sensitivity of a new computerized spatial span test (C-SST) that incorporates psychophysical methods to improve the precision of spatial span measurement. In Experiment 1, we analyzed C-SST test–retest reliability in 49 participants who underwent three test sessions at weekly intervals. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were higher for a psychophysically derived mean span (MnS) metric (0.83) than for the maximal span and total correct metrics used in traditional spatial-span tests. Response times (ReTs) also showed high ICCs (0.93) that correlated negatively with MnS scores and correlated positively with response-time latencies from other tests of processing speed. Learning effects were insignificant. Experiment 2 examined the performance of Experiment 1 participants when instructed to feign symptoms of traumatic brain injury (TBI): 57% showed abnormal MnS z-scores. A MnS z-score cutoff of 3.0 correctly classified 36% of simulated malingerers and 91% of the subgroup of 11 control participants with abnormal spans. Malingerers also made more substitution errors than control participants with abnormal spans (sensitivity = 43%, specificity = 91%). In addition, malingerers showed no evidence of ReT slowing, in contrast to significant abnormalities seen on other malingered tests of processing speed. As a result, differences between ReT z-scores and z-scores on other processing speed tests showed very high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing malingering and control participants with either normal or abnormal spans. Experiment 3 examined C-SST performance in a group of patients with predominantly mild TBI: neither MnS nor ReT z-scores showed significant group-level abnormalities. The C-SST improves the reliability and sensitivity of spatial span testing, can accurately detect malingering, and shows that visuospatial working memory is largely preserved in patients with predominantly mild TBI. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4700270/ /pubmed/26779001 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00690 Text en Copyright © 2016 Woods, Wyma, Herron and Yund. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Woods, David L.
Wyma, John M.
Herron, Timothy J.
Yund, E. W.
The Effects of Repeat Testing, Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on Computerized Measures of Visuospatial Memory Span
title The Effects of Repeat Testing, Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on Computerized Measures of Visuospatial Memory Span
title_full The Effects of Repeat Testing, Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on Computerized Measures of Visuospatial Memory Span
title_fullStr The Effects of Repeat Testing, Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on Computerized Measures of Visuospatial Memory Span
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Repeat Testing, Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on Computerized Measures of Visuospatial Memory Span
title_short The Effects of Repeat Testing, Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on Computerized Measures of Visuospatial Memory Span
title_sort effects of repeat testing, malingering, and traumatic brain injury on computerized measures of visuospatial memory span
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26779001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00690
work_keys_str_mv AT woodsdavidl theeffectsofrepeattestingmalingeringandtraumaticbraininjuryoncomputerizedmeasuresofvisuospatialmemoryspan
AT wymajohnm theeffectsofrepeattestingmalingeringandtraumaticbraininjuryoncomputerizedmeasuresofvisuospatialmemoryspan
AT herrontimothyj theeffectsofrepeattestingmalingeringandtraumaticbraininjuryoncomputerizedmeasuresofvisuospatialmemoryspan
AT yundew theeffectsofrepeattestingmalingeringandtraumaticbraininjuryoncomputerizedmeasuresofvisuospatialmemoryspan
AT woodsdavidl effectsofrepeattestingmalingeringandtraumaticbraininjuryoncomputerizedmeasuresofvisuospatialmemoryspan
AT wymajohnm effectsofrepeattestingmalingeringandtraumaticbraininjuryoncomputerizedmeasuresofvisuospatialmemoryspan
AT herrontimothyj effectsofrepeattestingmalingeringandtraumaticbraininjuryoncomputerizedmeasuresofvisuospatialmemoryspan
AT yundew effectsofrepeattestingmalingeringandtraumaticbraininjuryoncomputerizedmeasuresofvisuospatialmemoryspan