Cargando…

Hungry for an intervention? Adolescents’ ratings of acceptability of eating-related intervention strategies

BACKGROUND: Effective interventions promoting healthier eating behavior among adolescents are urgently needed. One factor that has been shown to impact effectiveness is whether the target population accepts the intervention. While previous research has assessed adults’ acceptance of eating-related i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stok, F. Marijn, de Ridder, Denise T. D., de Vet, Emely, Nureeva, Liliya, Luszczynska, Aleksandra, Wardle, Jane, Gaspar, Tania, de Wit, John B. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2665-6
_version_ 1782408340831207424
author Stok, F. Marijn
de Ridder, Denise T. D.
de Vet, Emely
Nureeva, Liliya
Luszczynska, Aleksandra
Wardle, Jane
Gaspar, Tania
de Wit, John B. F.
author_facet Stok, F. Marijn
de Ridder, Denise T. D.
de Vet, Emely
Nureeva, Liliya
Luszczynska, Aleksandra
Wardle, Jane
Gaspar, Tania
de Wit, John B. F.
author_sort Stok, F. Marijn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective interventions promoting healthier eating behavior among adolescents are urgently needed. One factor that has been shown to impact effectiveness is whether the target population accepts the intervention. While previous research has assessed adults’ acceptance of eating-related interventions, research on the opinion of adolescents is lacking. The current study addressed this gap in the literature. METHODS: Two thousand seven hundred sixty four adolescents (aged 10–17 years) from four European countries answered questions about individual characteristics (socio-demographics, anthropometrics, and average daily intake of healthy and unhealthy foods) and the acceptability of ten eating-related intervention strategies. These strategies varied in type (either promoting healthy eating or discouraging unhealthy eating), level of intrusiveness, setting (home, school, broader out-of-home environment), and change agent (parents, teacher, policy makers). RESULTS: Based on adolescents’ acceptability ratings, strategies could be clustered into two categories, those promoting healthy eating and those discouraging unhealthy eating, with acceptability rated significantly higher for the former. Acceptability of intervention strategies was rated moderate on average, but higher among girls, younger, overweight and immigrant adolescents, and those reporting healthier eating. Polish and Portuguese adolescents were overall more accepting of strategies than UK and Dutch adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents preferred intervention strategies that promote healthy eating over strategies that discourage unhealthy eating. Level of intrusiveness affected acceptability ratings for the latter type of strategies only. Various individual and behavioral characteristics were associated with acceptability. These findings provide practical guidance for the selection of acceptable intervention strategies to improve adolescents’ eating behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4700578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47005782016-01-06 Hungry for an intervention? Adolescents’ ratings of acceptability of eating-related intervention strategies Stok, F. Marijn de Ridder, Denise T. D. de Vet, Emely Nureeva, Liliya Luszczynska, Aleksandra Wardle, Jane Gaspar, Tania de Wit, John B. F. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Effective interventions promoting healthier eating behavior among adolescents are urgently needed. One factor that has been shown to impact effectiveness is whether the target population accepts the intervention. While previous research has assessed adults’ acceptance of eating-related interventions, research on the opinion of adolescents is lacking. The current study addressed this gap in the literature. METHODS: Two thousand seven hundred sixty four adolescents (aged 10–17 years) from four European countries answered questions about individual characteristics (socio-demographics, anthropometrics, and average daily intake of healthy and unhealthy foods) and the acceptability of ten eating-related intervention strategies. These strategies varied in type (either promoting healthy eating or discouraging unhealthy eating), level of intrusiveness, setting (home, school, broader out-of-home environment), and change agent (parents, teacher, policy makers). RESULTS: Based on adolescents’ acceptability ratings, strategies could be clustered into two categories, those promoting healthy eating and those discouraging unhealthy eating, with acceptability rated significantly higher for the former. Acceptability of intervention strategies was rated moderate on average, but higher among girls, younger, overweight and immigrant adolescents, and those reporting healthier eating. Polish and Portuguese adolescents were overall more accepting of strategies than UK and Dutch adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents preferred intervention strategies that promote healthy eating over strategies that discourage unhealthy eating. Level of intrusiveness affected acceptability ratings for the latter type of strategies only. Various individual and behavioral characteristics were associated with acceptability. These findings provide practical guidance for the selection of acceptable intervention strategies to improve adolescents’ eating behavior. BioMed Central 2016-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4700578/ /pubmed/26729328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2665-6 Text en © Stok et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stok, F. Marijn
de Ridder, Denise T. D.
de Vet, Emely
Nureeva, Liliya
Luszczynska, Aleksandra
Wardle, Jane
Gaspar, Tania
de Wit, John B. F.
Hungry for an intervention? Adolescents’ ratings of acceptability of eating-related intervention strategies
title Hungry for an intervention? Adolescents’ ratings of acceptability of eating-related intervention strategies
title_full Hungry for an intervention? Adolescents’ ratings of acceptability of eating-related intervention strategies
title_fullStr Hungry for an intervention? Adolescents’ ratings of acceptability of eating-related intervention strategies
title_full_unstemmed Hungry for an intervention? Adolescents’ ratings of acceptability of eating-related intervention strategies
title_short Hungry for an intervention? Adolescents’ ratings of acceptability of eating-related intervention strategies
title_sort hungry for an intervention? adolescents’ ratings of acceptability of eating-related intervention strategies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2665-6
work_keys_str_mv AT stokfmarijn hungryforaninterventionadolescentsratingsofacceptabilityofeatingrelatedinterventionstrategies
AT deridderdenisetd hungryforaninterventionadolescentsratingsofacceptabilityofeatingrelatedinterventionstrategies
AT devetemely hungryforaninterventionadolescentsratingsofacceptabilityofeatingrelatedinterventionstrategies
AT nureevaliliya hungryforaninterventionadolescentsratingsofacceptabilityofeatingrelatedinterventionstrategies
AT luszczynskaaleksandra hungryforaninterventionadolescentsratingsofacceptabilityofeatingrelatedinterventionstrategies
AT wardlejane hungryforaninterventionadolescentsratingsofacceptabilityofeatingrelatedinterventionstrategies
AT gaspartania hungryforaninterventionadolescentsratingsofacceptabilityofeatingrelatedinterventionstrategies
AT dewitjohnbf hungryforaninterventionadolescentsratingsofacceptabilityofeatingrelatedinterventionstrategies