Cargando…

Assessment of the prognostic and predictive utility of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI): an NCIC CTG MA.14 study

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers that can be used to accurately assess the residual risk of disease recurrence in women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer are clinically valuable. We evaluated the prognostic value of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI), a continuous risk index based on a combination of HO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sgroi, Dennis C., Chapman, Judy-Anne W., Badovinac-Crnjevic, T., Zarella, Elizabeth, Binns, Shemeica, Zhang, Yi, Schnabel, Catherine A., Erlander, Mark G., Pritchard, Kathleen I., Han, Lei, Shepherd, Lois E., Goss, Paul E., Pollak, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26728744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0660-6
_version_ 1782408366098743296
author Sgroi, Dennis C.
Chapman, Judy-Anne W.
Badovinac-Crnjevic, T.
Zarella, Elizabeth
Binns, Shemeica
Zhang, Yi
Schnabel, Catherine A.
Erlander, Mark G.
Pritchard, Kathleen I.
Han, Lei
Shepherd, Lois E.
Goss, Paul E.
Pollak, Michael
author_facet Sgroi, Dennis C.
Chapman, Judy-Anne W.
Badovinac-Crnjevic, T.
Zarella, Elizabeth
Binns, Shemeica
Zhang, Yi
Schnabel, Catherine A.
Erlander, Mark G.
Pritchard, Kathleen I.
Han, Lei
Shepherd, Lois E.
Goss, Paul E.
Pollak, Michael
author_sort Sgroi, Dennis C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biomarkers that can be used to accurately assess the residual risk of disease recurrence in women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer are clinically valuable. We evaluated the prognostic value of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI), a continuous risk index based on a combination of HOXB13:IL17BR and molecular grade index, in women with early breast cancer treated with either tamoxifen alone or tamoxifen plus octreotide in the NCIC MA.14 phase III clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00002864; registered 1 November 1999). METHODS: Gene expression analysis of BCI by real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed blinded to outcome on RNA extracted from archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples of 299 patients with both lymph node–negative (LN−) and lymph node–positive (LN+) disease enrolled in the MA.14 trial. Our primary objective was to determine the prognostic performance of BCI based on relapse-free survival (RFS). MA.14 patients experienced similar RFS on both treatment arms. Association of gene expression data with RFS was evaluated in univariate analysis with a stratified log-rank test statistic, depicted with a Kaplan-Meier plot and an adjusted Cox survivor plot. In the multivariate assessment, we used stratified Cox regression. The prognostic performance of an emerging, optimized linear BCI model was also assessed in a post hoc analysis. RESULTS: Of 299 samples, 292 were assessed successfully for BCI for 146 patients accrued in each MA.14 treatment arm. BCI risk groups had a significant univariate association with RFS (stratified log-rank p = 0.005, unstratified log-rank p = 0.007). Adjusted 10-year RFS in BCI low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups was 87.5 %, 83.9 %, and 74.7 %, respectively. BCI had a significant prognostic effect [hazard ratio (HR) 2.34, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.33–4.11; p = 0.004], although not a predictive effect, on RFS in stratified multivariate analysis, adjusted for pathological tumor stage (HR 2.22, 95 % CI 1.22–4.07; p = 0.01). In the post hoc multivariate analysis, higher linear BCI was associated with shorter RFS (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: BCI had a strong prognostic effect on RFS in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with tamoxifen alone or with tamoxifen and octreotide. BCI was prognostic in both LN− and LN+ patients. This retrospective study is an independent validation of the prognostic performance of BCI in a prospective trial. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-015-0660-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4700696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47006962016-01-06 Assessment of the prognostic and predictive utility of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI): an NCIC CTG MA.14 study Sgroi, Dennis C. Chapman, Judy-Anne W. Badovinac-Crnjevic, T. Zarella, Elizabeth Binns, Shemeica Zhang, Yi Schnabel, Catherine A. Erlander, Mark G. Pritchard, Kathleen I. Han, Lei Shepherd, Lois E. Goss, Paul E. Pollak, Michael Breast Cancer Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Biomarkers that can be used to accurately assess the residual risk of disease recurrence in women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer are clinically valuable. We evaluated the prognostic value of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI), a continuous risk index based on a combination of HOXB13:IL17BR and molecular grade index, in women with early breast cancer treated with either tamoxifen alone or tamoxifen plus octreotide in the NCIC MA.14 phase III clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00002864; registered 1 November 1999). METHODS: Gene expression analysis of BCI by real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed blinded to outcome on RNA extracted from archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples of 299 patients with both lymph node–negative (LN−) and lymph node–positive (LN+) disease enrolled in the MA.14 trial. Our primary objective was to determine the prognostic performance of BCI based on relapse-free survival (RFS). MA.14 patients experienced similar RFS on both treatment arms. Association of gene expression data with RFS was evaluated in univariate analysis with a stratified log-rank test statistic, depicted with a Kaplan-Meier plot and an adjusted Cox survivor plot. In the multivariate assessment, we used stratified Cox regression. The prognostic performance of an emerging, optimized linear BCI model was also assessed in a post hoc analysis. RESULTS: Of 299 samples, 292 were assessed successfully for BCI for 146 patients accrued in each MA.14 treatment arm. BCI risk groups had a significant univariate association with RFS (stratified log-rank p = 0.005, unstratified log-rank p = 0.007). Adjusted 10-year RFS in BCI low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups was 87.5 %, 83.9 %, and 74.7 %, respectively. BCI had a significant prognostic effect [hazard ratio (HR) 2.34, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.33–4.11; p = 0.004], although not a predictive effect, on RFS in stratified multivariate analysis, adjusted for pathological tumor stage (HR 2.22, 95 % CI 1.22–4.07; p = 0.01). In the post hoc multivariate analysis, higher linear BCI was associated with shorter RFS (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: BCI had a strong prognostic effect on RFS in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with tamoxifen alone or with tamoxifen and octreotide. BCI was prognostic in both LN− and LN+ patients. This retrospective study is an independent validation of the prognostic performance of BCI in a prospective trial. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-015-0660-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-04 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4700696/ /pubmed/26728744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0660-6 Text en © Sgroi et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sgroi, Dennis C.
Chapman, Judy-Anne W.
Badovinac-Crnjevic, T.
Zarella, Elizabeth
Binns, Shemeica
Zhang, Yi
Schnabel, Catherine A.
Erlander, Mark G.
Pritchard, Kathleen I.
Han, Lei
Shepherd, Lois E.
Goss, Paul E.
Pollak, Michael
Assessment of the prognostic and predictive utility of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI): an NCIC CTG MA.14 study
title Assessment of the prognostic and predictive utility of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI): an NCIC CTG MA.14 study
title_full Assessment of the prognostic and predictive utility of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI): an NCIC CTG MA.14 study
title_fullStr Assessment of the prognostic and predictive utility of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI): an NCIC CTG MA.14 study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the prognostic and predictive utility of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI): an NCIC CTG MA.14 study
title_short Assessment of the prognostic and predictive utility of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI): an NCIC CTG MA.14 study
title_sort assessment of the prognostic and predictive utility of the breast cancer index (bci): an ncic ctg ma.14 study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26728744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0660-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sgroidennisc assessmentoftheprognosticandpredictiveutilityofthebreastcancerindexbcianncicctgma14study
AT chapmanjudyannew assessmentoftheprognosticandpredictiveutilityofthebreastcancerindexbcianncicctgma14study
AT badovinaccrnjevict assessmentoftheprognosticandpredictiveutilityofthebreastcancerindexbcianncicctgma14study
AT zarellaelizabeth assessmentoftheprognosticandpredictiveutilityofthebreastcancerindexbcianncicctgma14study
AT binnsshemeica assessmentoftheprognosticandpredictiveutilityofthebreastcancerindexbcianncicctgma14study
AT zhangyi assessmentoftheprognosticandpredictiveutilityofthebreastcancerindexbcianncicctgma14study
AT schnabelcatherinea assessmentoftheprognosticandpredictiveutilityofthebreastcancerindexbcianncicctgma14study
AT erlandermarkg assessmentoftheprognosticandpredictiveutilityofthebreastcancerindexbcianncicctgma14study
AT pritchardkathleeni assessmentoftheprognosticandpredictiveutilityofthebreastcancerindexbcianncicctgma14study
AT hanlei assessmentoftheprognosticandpredictiveutilityofthebreastcancerindexbcianncicctgma14study
AT shepherdloise assessmentoftheprognosticandpredictiveutilityofthebreastcancerindexbcianncicctgma14study
AT gosspaule assessmentoftheprognosticandpredictiveutilityofthebreastcancerindexbcianncicctgma14study
AT pollakmichael assessmentoftheprognosticandpredictiveutilityofthebreastcancerindexbcianncicctgma14study