Cargando…

Orbital floor fractures – short- and intermediate-term complications depending on treatment procedures

BACKGROUND: Many reconstruction materials for orbital floor fractures have been described in the past including autologous bone transplants, resorbable polymers and titan meshes. So far evidence is missing which material is used successfully regarding indication and particular size of defect. Theref...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holtmann, Henrik, Eren, Hatice, Sander, Karoline, Kübler, Norbert R., Handschel, Jörg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-015-0096-3
_version_ 1782408373942091776
author Holtmann, Henrik
Eren, Hatice
Sander, Karoline
Kübler, Norbert R.
Handschel, Jörg
author_facet Holtmann, Henrik
Eren, Hatice
Sander, Karoline
Kübler, Norbert R.
Handschel, Jörg
author_sort Holtmann, Henrik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many reconstruction materials for orbital floor fractures have been described in the past including autologous bone transplants, resorbable polymers and titan meshes. So far evidence is missing which material is used successfully regarding indication and particular size of defect. Therefore the aim of this study was to evaluate which reconstruction technique produces best clinical outcome and least complications associated with indication. METHODS: Retrospectively, surgical and ophthalmological data plus CT scans from a collective of 775 patients between 2005 and 2012 were analyzed. Furthermore included patients were sounded on satisfaction and potential problems postoperatively. RESULTS: Overall 593 patients offered full pre- and postoperative short-time data appropriate to inclusion criteria – of these 507 (85,5 %) underwent primary surgical treatment. Smallest average defect size was found in cases with no indication for surgical treatment (81 mm(2)), largest in cases indicating titanium mesh reconstruction (601.5 mm(2)). In 15 cases exact fragment reposition was possible without insertion of alloplastic material. Best clinical results obtained reconstruction using polydioxanone foil (PDS). 0.15 mm PDS-foil: 444 patients, reduced diplopia pre to postoperative 16 to 6 % (p < 0.01), ex- and enophthalmus < 2 % after surgery. 0.25 mm PDS-foil: 26 patients, reduced diplopia from pre- to postoperative 34,6 to 3,8 % (p < 0.01), postoperative exophthalmus rate was higher than preoperative (3,8 to 7,7 %). In comparison to reconstruction with PDS-foil a higher percentage of patients reconstructed with titanium meshes (n = 22) revealed no significant reduction of diplopia (45,5 to 31,8 %; p = 0.07). Furthermore 63 of all included patients agreed to complete a questionnaire on intermediate-term postoperative symptoms and surgical contentedness. Remarkably 50 % of the patients reconstructed with titanium meshes indicated foreign body sensations and cold feeling in the long-term. CONCLUSIONS: Short- and intermediate-term results of clinical outcome in our patients with surgical treated orbital floor fractures (i.e. diplopia, en- or exophthalmus) reveal that thin resorbable foils, particularly 0.15 mm diameter PDS-foil seem to generate best results referring to orbital floor defects with a size of 250 to 300 mm(2). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study number 4222, year 2013, ethics committee of the medical faculty of the Heinrich Heine university of Duesseldorf.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4700729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47007292016-01-06 Orbital floor fractures – short- and intermediate-term complications depending on treatment procedures Holtmann, Henrik Eren, Hatice Sander, Karoline Kübler, Norbert R. Handschel, Jörg Head Face Med Research BACKGROUND: Many reconstruction materials for orbital floor fractures have been described in the past including autologous bone transplants, resorbable polymers and titan meshes. So far evidence is missing which material is used successfully regarding indication and particular size of defect. Therefore the aim of this study was to evaluate which reconstruction technique produces best clinical outcome and least complications associated with indication. METHODS: Retrospectively, surgical and ophthalmological data plus CT scans from a collective of 775 patients between 2005 and 2012 were analyzed. Furthermore included patients were sounded on satisfaction and potential problems postoperatively. RESULTS: Overall 593 patients offered full pre- and postoperative short-time data appropriate to inclusion criteria – of these 507 (85,5 %) underwent primary surgical treatment. Smallest average defect size was found in cases with no indication for surgical treatment (81 mm(2)), largest in cases indicating titanium mesh reconstruction (601.5 mm(2)). In 15 cases exact fragment reposition was possible without insertion of alloplastic material. Best clinical results obtained reconstruction using polydioxanone foil (PDS). 0.15 mm PDS-foil: 444 patients, reduced diplopia pre to postoperative 16 to 6 % (p < 0.01), ex- and enophthalmus < 2 % after surgery. 0.25 mm PDS-foil: 26 patients, reduced diplopia from pre- to postoperative 34,6 to 3,8 % (p < 0.01), postoperative exophthalmus rate was higher than preoperative (3,8 to 7,7 %). In comparison to reconstruction with PDS-foil a higher percentage of patients reconstructed with titanium meshes (n = 22) revealed no significant reduction of diplopia (45,5 to 31,8 %; p = 0.07). Furthermore 63 of all included patients agreed to complete a questionnaire on intermediate-term postoperative symptoms and surgical contentedness. Remarkably 50 % of the patients reconstructed with titanium meshes indicated foreign body sensations and cold feeling in the long-term. CONCLUSIONS: Short- and intermediate-term results of clinical outcome in our patients with surgical treated orbital floor fractures (i.e. diplopia, en- or exophthalmus) reveal that thin resorbable foils, particularly 0.15 mm diameter PDS-foil seem to generate best results referring to orbital floor defects with a size of 250 to 300 mm(2). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study number 4222, year 2013, ethics committee of the medical faculty of the Heinrich Heine university of Duesseldorf. BioMed Central 2016-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4700729/ /pubmed/26729217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-015-0096-3 Text en © Holtmann et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Holtmann, Henrik
Eren, Hatice
Sander, Karoline
Kübler, Norbert R.
Handschel, Jörg
Orbital floor fractures – short- and intermediate-term complications depending on treatment procedures
title Orbital floor fractures – short- and intermediate-term complications depending on treatment procedures
title_full Orbital floor fractures – short- and intermediate-term complications depending on treatment procedures
title_fullStr Orbital floor fractures – short- and intermediate-term complications depending on treatment procedures
title_full_unstemmed Orbital floor fractures – short- and intermediate-term complications depending on treatment procedures
title_short Orbital floor fractures – short- and intermediate-term complications depending on treatment procedures
title_sort orbital floor fractures – short- and intermediate-term complications depending on treatment procedures
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-015-0096-3
work_keys_str_mv AT holtmannhenrik orbitalfloorfracturesshortandintermediatetermcomplicationsdependingontreatmentprocedures
AT erenhatice orbitalfloorfracturesshortandintermediatetermcomplicationsdependingontreatmentprocedures
AT sanderkaroline orbitalfloorfracturesshortandintermediatetermcomplicationsdependingontreatmentprocedures
AT kublernorbertr orbitalfloorfracturesshortandintermediatetermcomplicationsdependingontreatmentprocedures
AT handscheljorg orbitalfloorfracturesshortandintermediatetermcomplicationsdependingontreatmentprocedures