Cargando…

The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations

BACKGROUND: Contrast agents are used in resting echocardiography to opacify the left ventricular (LV) cavity and to improve LV endocardial border delineation in patients with suboptimal image quality. If a wider use of contrast-enhanced echocardiography would be adopted instead of the current select...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larsson, Malin K., Da Silva, Cristina, Gunyeli, Elif, Ilami, Ali Akebat Bin, Szummer, Karolina, Winter, Reidar, Bjällmark, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-015-0045-0
_version_ 1782408379859206144
author Larsson, Malin K.
Da Silva, Cristina
Gunyeli, Elif
Ilami, Ali Akebat Bin
Szummer, Karolina
Winter, Reidar
Bjällmark, Anna
author_facet Larsson, Malin K.
Da Silva, Cristina
Gunyeli, Elif
Ilami, Ali Akebat Bin
Szummer, Karolina
Winter, Reidar
Bjällmark, Anna
author_sort Larsson, Malin K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Contrast agents are used in resting echocardiography to opacify the left ventricular (LV) cavity and to improve LV endocardial border delineation in patients with suboptimal image quality. If a wider use of contrast-enhanced echocardiography would be adopted instead of the current selective approach, diagnoses such as myocardial ischemia and LV structural abnormalities could potentially be detected earlier. The aim was therefore to retrospectively investigate if contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond the current recommendations for contrast agent usage affects assessment of wall motion abnormalities, ejection fraction (EF) and detection of LV structural abnormalities. A secondary aim was to evaluate the user dependency during image analysis. METHODS: Experienced readers (n = 4) evaluated wall motion score index (WMSI) and measured EF on greyscale and contrast-enhanced images from 192 patients without indications for contrast-enhanced echocardiography. Additionally, screening for LV structural abnormalities was performed. Repeated measurements were performed in 20 patients by the experienced as well as by inexperienced (n = 2) readers. RESULTS: Contrast analysis resulted in significantly higher WMSI compared to greyscale analysis (p < 0.003). Of the 83 patients, classified as healthy by greyscale analysis, 55 % were re-classified with motion abnormalities by contrast analysis. No significant difference in EF classification (≥55 %, 45–54 %, 30–44 %, < 30 %) was observed. LV structural abnormalities, such as increased trabeculation (n = 21), apical aneurysm (n = 4), hypertrophy (n = 1) and thrombus (n = 1) were detected during contrast analysis. Intra- and interobserver variability for experienced readers as well as the variability between inexperienced and experienced readers decreased for WMSI and EF after contrast analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations for contrast agent usage increased the number of detected wall motion and LV structural abnormalities. Moreover, contrast-enhanced echocardiography increased reproducibility for assessment of WMSI and EF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4700757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47007572016-01-06 The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations Larsson, Malin K. Da Silva, Cristina Gunyeli, Elif Ilami, Ali Akebat Bin Szummer, Karolina Winter, Reidar Bjällmark, Anna Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Contrast agents are used in resting echocardiography to opacify the left ventricular (LV) cavity and to improve LV endocardial border delineation in patients with suboptimal image quality. If a wider use of contrast-enhanced echocardiography would be adopted instead of the current selective approach, diagnoses such as myocardial ischemia and LV structural abnormalities could potentially be detected earlier. The aim was therefore to retrospectively investigate if contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond the current recommendations for contrast agent usage affects assessment of wall motion abnormalities, ejection fraction (EF) and detection of LV structural abnormalities. A secondary aim was to evaluate the user dependency during image analysis. METHODS: Experienced readers (n = 4) evaluated wall motion score index (WMSI) and measured EF on greyscale and contrast-enhanced images from 192 patients without indications for contrast-enhanced echocardiography. Additionally, screening for LV structural abnormalities was performed. Repeated measurements were performed in 20 patients by the experienced as well as by inexperienced (n = 2) readers. RESULTS: Contrast analysis resulted in significantly higher WMSI compared to greyscale analysis (p < 0.003). Of the 83 patients, classified as healthy by greyscale analysis, 55 % were re-classified with motion abnormalities by contrast analysis. No significant difference in EF classification (≥55 %, 45–54 %, 30–44 %, < 30 %) was observed. LV structural abnormalities, such as increased trabeculation (n = 21), apical aneurysm (n = 4), hypertrophy (n = 1) and thrombus (n = 1) were detected during contrast analysis. Intra- and interobserver variability for experienced readers as well as the variability between inexperienced and experienced readers decreased for WMSI and EF after contrast analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations for contrast agent usage increased the number of detected wall motion and LV structural abnormalities. Moreover, contrast-enhanced echocardiography increased reproducibility for assessment of WMSI and EF. BioMed Central 2016-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4700757/ /pubmed/26729298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-015-0045-0 Text en © Larsson et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Larsson, Malin K.
Da Silva, Cristina
Gunyeli, Elif
Ilami, Ali Akebat Bin
Szummer, Karolina
Winter, Reidar
Bjällmark, Anna
The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations
title The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations
title_full The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations
title_fullStr The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations
title_full_unstemmed The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations
title_short The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations
title_sort potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-015-0045-0
work_keys_str_mv AT larssonmalink thepotentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations
AT dasilvacristina thepotentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations
AT gunyelielif thepotentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations
AT ilamialiakebatbin thepotentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations
AT szummerkarolina thepotentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations
AT winterreidar thepotentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations
AT bjallmarkanna thepotentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations
AT larssonmalink potentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations
AT dasilvacristina potentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations
AT gunyelielif potentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations
AT ilamialiakebatbin potentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations
AT szummerkarolina potentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations
AT winterreidar potentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations
AT bjallmarkanna potentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations