Cargando…
The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations
BACKGROUND: Contrast agents are used in resting echocardiography to opacify the left ventricular (LV) cavity and to improve LV endocardial border delineation in patients with suboptimal image quality. If a wider use of contrast-enhanced echocardiography would be adopted instead of the current select...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-015-0045-0 |
_version_ | 1782408379859206144 |
---|---|
author | Larsson, Malin K. Da Silva, Cristina Gunyeli, Elif Ilami, Ali Akebat Bin Szummer, Karolina Winter, Reidar Bjällmark, Anna |
author_facet | Larsson, Malin K. Da Silva, Cristina Gunyeli, Elif Ilami, Ali Akebat Bin Szummer, Karolina Winter, Reidar Bjällmark, Anna |
author_sort | Larsson, Malin K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Contrast agents are used in resting echocardiography to opacify the left ventricular (LV) cavity and to improve LV endocardial border delineation in patients with suboptimal image quality. If a wider use of contrast-enhanced echocardiography would be adopted instead of the current selective approach, diagnoses such as myocardial ischemia and LV structural abnormalities could potentially be detected earlier. The aim was therefore to retrospectively investigate if contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond the current recommendations for contrast agent usage affects assessment of wall motion abnormalities, ejection fraction (EF) and detection of LV structural abnormalities. A secondary aim was to evaluate the user dependency during image analysis. METHODS: Experienced readers (n = 4) evaluated wall motion score index (WMSI) and measured EF on greyscale and contrast-enhanced images from 192 patients without indications for contrast-enhanced echocardiography. Additionally, screening for LV structural abnormalities was performed. Repeated measurements were performed in 20 patients by the experienced as well as by inexperienced (n = 2) readers. RESULTS: Contrast analysis resulted in significantly higher WMSI compared to greyscale analysis (p < 0.003). Of the 83 patients, classified as healthy by greyscale analysis, 55 % were re-classified with motion abnormalities by contrast analysis. No significant difference in EF classification (≥55 %, 45–54 %, 30–44 %, < 30 %) was observed. LV structural abnormalities, such as increased trabeculation (n = 21), apical aneurysm (n = 4), hypertrophy (n = 1) and thrombus (n = 1) were detected during contrast analysis. Intra- and interobserver variability for experienced readers as well as the variability between inexperienced and experienced readers decreased for WMSI and EF after contrast analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations for contrast agent usage increased the number of detected wall motion and LV structural abnormalities. Moreover, contrast-enhanced echocardiography increased reproducibility for assessment of WMSI and EF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4700757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47007572016-01-06 The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations Larsson, Malin K. Da Silva, Cristina Gunyeli, Elif Ilami, Ali Akebat Bin Szummer, Karolina Winter, Reidar Bjällmark, Anna Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Contrast agents are used in resting echocardiography to opacify the left ventricular (LV) cavity and to improve LV endocardial border delineation in patients with suboptimal image quality. If a wider use of contrast-enhanced echocardiography would be adopted instead of the current selective approach, diagnoses such as myocardial ischemia and LV structural abnormalities could potentially be detected earlier. The aim was therefore to retrospectively investigate if contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond the current recommendations for contrast agent usage affects assessment of wall motion abnormalities, ejection fraction (EF) and detection of LV structural abnormalities. A secondary aim was to evaluate the user dependency during image analysis. METHODS: Experienced readers (n = 4) evaluated wall motion score index (WMSI) and measured EF on greyscale and contrast-enhanced images from 192 patients without indications for contrast-enhanced echocardiography. Additionally, screening for LV structural abnormalities was performed. Repeated measurements were performed in 20 patients by the experienced as well as by inexperienced (n = 2) readers. RESULTS: Contrast analysis resulted in significantly higher WMSI compared to greyscale analysis (p < 0.003). Of the 83 patients, classified as healthy by greyscale analysis, 55 % were re-classified with motion abnormalities by contrast analysis. No significant difference in EF classification (≥55 %, 45–54 %, 30–44 %, < 30 %) was observed. LV structural abnormalities, such as increased trabeculation (n = 21), apical aneurysm (n = 4), hypertrophy (n = 1) and thrombus (n = 1) were detected during contrast analysis. Intra- and interobserver variability for experienced readers as well as the variability between inexperienced and experienced readers decreased for WMSI and EF after contrast analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations for contrast agent usage increased the number of detected wall motion and LV structural abnormalities. Moreover, contrast-enhanced echocardiography increased reproducibility for assessment of WMSI and EF. BioMed Central 2016-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4700757/ /pubmed/26729298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-015-0045-0 Text en © Larsson et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Larsson, Malin K. Da Silva, Cristina Gunyeli, Elif Ilami, Ali Akebat Bin Szummer, Karolina Winter, Reidar Bjällmark, Anna The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations |
title | The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations |
title_full | The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations |
title_fullStr | The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed | The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations |
title_short | The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations |
title_sort | potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-015-0045-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT larssonmalink thepotentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations AT dasilvacristina thepotentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations AT gunyelielif thepotentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations AT ilamialiakebatbin thepotentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations AT szummerkarolina thepotentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations AT winterreidar thepotentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations AT bjallmarkanna thepotentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations AT larssonmalink potentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations AT dasilvacristina potentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations AT gunyelielif potentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations AT ilamialiakebatbin potentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations AT szummerkarolina potentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations AT winterreidar potentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations AT bjallmarkanna potentialclinicalvalueofcontrastenhancedechocardiographybeyondcurrentrecommendations |