Cargando…
Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns
Adding an affix to transform a word is common across the world languages, with the edges of words more likely to carry out such a function. However, detecting affixation patterns is also observed in learning tasks outside the domain of language, suggesting that the underlying mechanism from which af...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4701768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26297477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0913-x |
_version_ | 1782408528285138944 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Jiani Jansen, Naomi ten Cate, Carel |
author_facet | Chen, Jiani Jansen, Naomi ten Cate, Carel |
author_sort | Chen, Jiani |
collection | PubMed |
description | Adding an affix to transform a word is common across the world languages, with the edges of words more likely to carry out such a function. However, detecting affixation patterns is also observed in learning tasks outside the domain of language, suggesting that the underlying mechanism from which affixation patterns have arisen may not be language or even human specific. We addressed whether a songbird, the zebra finch, is able to discriminate between, and generalize, affixation-like patterns. Zebra finches were trained and tested in a Go/Nogo paradigm to discriminate artificial song element sequences resembling prefixed and suffixed ‘words.’ The ‘stems’ of the ‘words,’ consisted of different combinations of a triplet of song elements, to which a fourth element was added as either a ‘prefix’ or a ‘suffix.’ After training, the birds were tested with novel stems, consisting of either rearranged familiar element types or novel element types. The birds were able to generalize the affixation patterns to novel stems with both familiar and novel element types. Hence, the discrimination resulting from the training was not based on memorization of individual stimuli, but on a shared property among Go or Nogo stimuli, i.e., affixation patterns. Remarkably, birds trained with suffixation as Go pattern showed clear evidence of using both prefix and suffix, while those trained with the prefix as the Go stimulus used primarily the prefix. This finding illustrates that an asymmetry in attending to different affixations is not restricted to human languages. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4701768 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47017682016-01-11 Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns Chen, Jiani Jansen, Naomi ten Cate, Carel Anim Cogn Original Paper Adding an affix to transform a word is common across the world languages, with the edges of words more likely to carry out such a function. However, detecting affixation patterns is also observed in learning tasks outside the domain of language, suggesting that the underlying mechanism from which affixation patterns have arisen may not be language or even human specific. We addressed whether a songbird, the zebra finch, is able to discriminate between, and generalize, affixation-like patterns. Zebra finches were trained and tested in a Go/Nogo paradigm to discriminate artificial song element sequences resembling prefixed and suffixed ‘words.’ The ‘stems’ of the ‘words,’ consisted of different combinations of a triplet of song elements, to which a fourth element was added as either a ‘prefix’ or a ‘suffix.’ After training, the birds were tested with novel stems, consisting of either rearranged familiar element types or novel element types. The birds were able to generalize the affixation patterns to novel stems with both familiar and novel element types. Hence, the discrimination resulting from the training was not based on memorization of individual stimuli, but on a shared property among Go or Nogo stimuli, i.e., affixation patterns. Remarkably, birds trained with suffixation as Go pattern showed clear evidence of using both prefix and suffix, while those trained with the prefix as the Go stimulus used primarily the prefix. This finding illustrates that an asymmetry in attending to different affixations is not restricted to human languages. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-08-22 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4701768/ /pubmed/26297477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0913-x Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Chen, Jiani Jansen, Naomi ten Cate, Carel Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns |
title | Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns |
title_full | Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns |
title_fullStr | Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns |
title_full_unstemmed | Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns |
title_short | Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns |
title_sort | zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4701768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26297477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0913-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenjiani zebrafinchesareabletolearnaffixationlikepatterns AT jansennaomi zebrafinchesareabletolearnaffixationlikepatterns AT tencatecarel zebrafinchesareabletolearnaffixationlikepatterns |