Cargando…

Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns

Adding an affix to transform a word is common across the world languages, with the edges of words more likely to carry out such a function. However, detecting affixation patterns is also observed in learning tasks outside the domain of language, suggesting that the underlying mechanism from which af...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jiani, Jansen, Naomi, ten Cate, Carel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4701768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26297477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0913-x
_version_ 1782408528285138944
author Chen, Jiani
Jansen, Naomi
ten Cate, Carel
author_facet Chen, Jiani
Jansen, Naomi
ten Cate, Carel
author_sort Chen, Jiani
collection PubMed
description Adding an affix to transform a word is common across the world languages, with the edges of words more likely to carry out such a function. However, detecting affixation patterns is also observed in learning tasks outside the domain of language, suggesting that the underlying mechanism from which affixation patterns have arisen may not be language or even human specific. We addressed whether a songbird, the zebra finch, is able to discriminate between, and generalize, affixation-like patterns. Zebra finches were trained and tested in a Go/Nogo paradigm to discriminate artificial song element sequences resembling prefixed and suffixed ‘words.’ The ‘stems’ of the ‘words,’ consisted of different combinations of a triplet of song elements, to which a fourth element was added as either a ‘prefix’ or a ‘suffix.’ After training, the birds were tested with novel stems, consisting of either rearranged familiar element types or novel element types. The birds were able to generalize the affixation patterns to novel stems with both familiar and novel element types. Hence, the discrimination resulting from the training was not based on memorization of individual stimuli, but on a shared property among Go or Nogo stimuli, i.e., affixation patterns. Remarkably, birds trained with suffixation as Go pattern showed clear evidence of using both prefix and suffix, while those trained with the prefix as the Go stimulus used primarily the prefix. This finding illustrates that an asymmetry in attending to different affixations is not restricted to human languages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4701768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47017682016-01-11 Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns Chen, Jiani Jansen, Naomi ten Cate, Carel Anim Cogn Original Paper Adding an affix to transform a word is common across the world languages, with the edges of words more likely to carry out such a function. However, detecting affixation patterns is also observed in learning tasks outside the domain of language, suggesting that the underlying mechanism from which affixation patterns have arisen may not be language or even human specific. We addressed whether a songbird, the zebra finch, is able to discriminate between, and generalize, affixation-like patterns. Zebra finches were trained and tested in a Go/Nogo paradigm to discriminate artificial song element sequences resembling prefixed and suffixed ‘words.’ The ‘stems’ of the ‘words,’ consisted of different combinations of a triplet of song elements, to which a fourth element was added as either a ‘prefix’ or a ‘suffix.’ After training, the birds were tested with novel stems, consisting of either rearranged familiar element types or novel element types. The birds were able to generalize the affixation patterns to novel stems with both familiar and novel element types. Hence, the discrimination resulting from the training was not based on memorization of individual stimuli, but on a shared property among Go or Nogo stimuli, i.e., affixation patterns. Remarkably, birds trained with suffixation as Go pattern showed clear evidence of using both prefix and suffix, while those trained with the prefix as the Go stimulus used primarily the prefix. This finding illustrates that an asymmetry in attending to different affixations is not restricted to human languages. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-08-22 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4701768/ /pubmed/26297477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0913-x Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Chen, Jiani
Jansen, Naomi
ten Cate, Carel
Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns
title Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns
title_full Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns
title_fullStr Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns
title_full_unstemmed Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns
title_short Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns
title_sort zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4701768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26297477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0913-x
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjiani zebrafinchesareabletolearnaffixationlikepatterns
AT jansennaomi zebrafinchesareabletolearnaffixationlikepatterns
AT tencatecarel zebrafinchesareabletolearnaffixationlikepatterns