Cargando…
Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them
The study of sexual selection is being revolutionised by the realisation that most populations exhibit some degree of polyandry, i.e. females mating with multiple males. Polyandry can drastically change the operation of sexual selection on males as it reduces the reproductive success that males deri...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4701770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26766884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2041-7 |
_version_ | 1782408528745463808 |
---|---|
author | McDonald, Grant C. Pizzari, Tommaso |
author_facet | McDonald, Grant C. Pizzari, Tommaso |
author_sort | McDonald, Grant C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The study of sexual selection is being revolutionised by the realisation that most populations exhibit some degree of polyandry, i.e. females mating with multiple males. Polyandry can drastically change the operation of sexual selection on males as it reduces the reproductive success that males derive by mating with different females, by forcing their ejaculates to compete for fertilisation after copulation (sperm competition). Variation in polyandry within a population means that the impact of polyandry can differ drastically across males, depending on the polyandry of their own mating partners. Because the patterns through which males share mates within a population may have strong repercussions for variation in male reproductive success, measuring such patterns is critical to study the operation of sexual selection. Several methods have been proposed to measure the pattern of mate sharing at the population level. Here, we develop a new method (sperm competition intensity correlation, SCIC) and compare its performance against two established methods (Newman’s assortativity and nestedness), using both idealised model populations and random simulated populations, across a range of biologically relevant population parameters: (i) population size, (ii) sex ratio and (iii) the ‘mating density’ of the population. We conclude that SCIC may be the most promising approach, as it is both internally consistent and robust across the parameter range. We discuss some important caveats and provide advice regarding the choice of method for future studies of sexual selection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00265-015-2041-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4701770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47017702016-01-11 Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them McDonald, Grant C. Pizzari, Tommaso Behav Ecol Sociobiol Methods The study of sexual selection is being revolutionised by the realisation that most populations exhibit some degree of polyandry, i.e. females mating with multiple males. Polyandry can drastically change the operation of sexual selection on males as it reduces the reproductive success that males derive by mating with different females, by forcing their ejaculates to compete for fertilisation after copulation (sperm competition). Variation in polyandry within a population means that the impact of polyandry can differ drastically across males, depending on the polyandry of their own mating partners. Because the patterns through which males share mates within a population may have strong repercussions for variation in male reproductive success, measuring such patterns is critical to study the operation of sexual selection. Several methods have been proposed to measure the pattern of mate sharing at the population level. Here, we develop a new method (sperm competition intensity correlation, SCIC) and compare its performance against two established methods (Newman’s assortativity and nestedness), using both idealised model populations and random simulated populations, across a range of biologically relevant population parameters: (i) population size, (ii) sex ratio and (iii) the ‘mating density’ of the population. We conclude that SCIC may be the most promising approach, as it is both internally consistent and robust across the parameter range. We discuss some important caveats and provide advice regarding the choice of method for future studies of sexual selection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00265-015-2041-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-11-27 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4701770/ /pubmed/26766884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2041-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Methods McDonald, Grant C. Pizzari, Tommaso Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them |
title | Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them |
title_full | Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them |
title_fullStr | Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them |
title_full_unstemmed | Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them |
title_short | Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them |
title_sort | why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them |
topic | Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4701770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26766884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2041-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcdonaldgrantc whypatternsofassortativematingarekeytostudysexualselectionandhowtomeasurethem AT pizzaritommaso whypatternsofassortativematingarekeytostudysexualselectionandhowtomeasurethem |