Cargando…

Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them

The study of sexual selection is being revolutionised by the realisation that most populations exhibit some degree of polyandry, i.e. females mating with multiple males. Polyandry can drastically change the operation of sexual selection on males as it reduces the reproductive success that males deri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McDonald, Grant C., Pizzari, Tommaso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4701770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26766884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2041-7
_version_ 1782408528745463808
author McDonald, Grant C.
Pizzari, Tommaso
author_facet McDonald, Grant C.
Pizzari, Tommaso
author_sort McDonald, Grant C.
collection PubMed
description The study of sexual selection is being revolutionised by the realisation that most populations exhibit some degree of polyandry, i.e. females mating with multiple males. Polyandry can drastically change the operation of sexual selection on males as it reduces the reproductive success that males derive by mating with different females, by forcing their ejaculates to compete for fertilisation after copulation (sperm competition). Variation in polyandry within a population means that the impact of polyandry can differ drastically across males, depending on the polyandry of their own mating partners. Because the patterns through which males share mates within a population may have strong repercussions for variation in male reproductive success, measuring such patterns is critical to study the operation of sexual selection. Several methods have been proposed to measure the pattern of mate sharing at the population level. Here, we develop a new method (sperm competition intensity correlation, SCIC) and compare its performance against two established methods (Newman’s assortativity and nestedness), using both idealised model populations and random simulated populations, across a range of biologically relevant population parameters: (i) population size, (ii) sex ratio and (iii) the ‘mating density’ of the population. We conclude that SCIC may be the most promising approach, as it is both internally consistent and robust across the parameter range. We discuss some important caveats and provide advice regarding the choice of method for future studies of sexual selection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00265-015-2041-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4701770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47017702016-01-11 Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them McDonald, Grant C. Pizzari, Tommaso Behav Ecol Sociobiol Methods The study of sexual selection is being revolutionised by the realisation that most populations exhibit some degree of polyandry, i.e. females mating with multiple males. Polyandry can drastically change the operation of sexual selection on males as it reduces the reproductive success that males derive by mating with different females, by forcing their ejaculates to compete for fertilisation after copulation (sperm competition). Variation in polyandry within a population means that the impact of polyandry can differ drastically across males, depending on the polyandry of their own mating partners. Because the patterns through which males share mates within a population may have strong repercussions for variation in male reproductive success, measuring such patterns is critical to study the operation of sexual selection. Several methods have been proposed to measure the pattern of mate sharing at the population level. Here, we develop a new method (sperm competition intensity correlation, SCIC) and compare its performance against two established methods (Newman’s assortativity and nestedness), using both idealised model populations and random simulated populations, across a range of biologically relevant population parameters: (i) population size, (ii) sex ratio and (iii) the ‘mating density’ of the population. We conclude that SCIC may be the most promising approach, as it is both internally consistent and robust across the parameter range. We discuss some important caveats and provide advice regarding the choice of method for future studies of sexual selection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00265-015-2041-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-11-27 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4701770/ /pubmed/26766884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2041-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Methods
McDonald, Grant C.
Pizzari, Tommaso
Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them
title Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them
title_full Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them
title_fullStr Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them
title_full_unstemmed Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them
title_short Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them
title_sort why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4701770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26766884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2041-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdonaldgrantc whypatternsofassortativematingarekeytostudysexualselectionandhowtomeasurethem
AT pizzaritommaso whypatternsofassortativematingarekeytostudysexualselectionandhowtomeasurethem