Cargando…

Identifying avian malaria vectors: sampling methods influence outcomes

BACKGROUND: The role of vectors in the transmission of avian malaria parasites is currently understudied. Many studies that investigate parasite-vector relationships use limited trapping techniques and/or identify potential competent vectors in the field in such ways that cannot distinguish between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlson, Jenny S., Walther, Erika, TroutFryxell, Rebecca, Staley, Sarah, Tell, Lisa A., Sehgal, Ravinder N. M., Barker, Christopher M., Cornel, Anthony J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4702297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26160384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0969-0
_version_ 1782408612690264064
author Carlson, Jenny S.
Walther, Erika
TroutFryxell, Rebecca
Staley, Sarah
Tell, Lisa A.
Sehgal, Ravinder N. M.
Barker, Christopher M.
Cornel, Anthony J.
author_facet Carlson, Jenny S.
Walther, Erika
TroutFryxell, Rebecca
Staley, Sarah
Tell, Lisa A.
Sehgal, Ravinder N. M.
Barker, Christopher M.
Cornel, Anthony J.
author_sort Carlson, Jenny S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The role of vectors in the transmission of avian malaria parasites is currently understudied. Many studies that investigate parasite-vector relationships use limited trapping techniques and/or identify potential competent vectors in the field in such ways that cannot distinguish between an infected or infectious vector. Without the use of multiple trapping techniques that address the specific biology of diverse mosquito species, and without looking at the infection status of individual mosquitoes, it is not possible to make dependable conclusions on the role of mosquitoes in the transmission of avian malaria parasites. METHODS: We conducted two years of mosquito collections at a riparian preserve in California where a wide diversity of species were collected with multiple trap types. We hypothesized that competent mosquito species can influence the distribution and diversity of avian malaria parasites by acting as a compatibility filter for specific Plasmodium species. To determine the infection status of all individual mosquitoes for Plasmodium species/lineages, amplification within the cytochrome b gene was carried out on over 3000 individual mosquito thoraxes, and for those that tested positive we then repeated the same process for abdomens and salivary glands. RESULTS: Our data show heterogeneity in the transmissibility of Plasmodium among ornithophillic mosquito species. More specifically, Culex stigmatosoma appears to not be a vector of Plasmodium homopolare, a parasite that is prevalent in the avian population, but is a vector of multiple other Plasmodium species/lineages. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that conclusions made on the role of vectors from studies that do not use different mosquito trapping methods should be re-evaluated with caution, as we documented the potential for trapping biases, which may cause studies to miss important roles of specific mosquito species in the transmission of avian malaria. Moreover, we document heterogeneity in the transmission of Plasmodium spp. by mosquitoes can influence Plasmodium diversity and prevalence in specific locations to Plasmodium-vector incompatibilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4702297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47022972016-01-07 Identifying avian malaria vectors: sampling methods influence outcomes Carlson, Jenny S. Walther, Erika TroutFryxell, Rebecca Staley, Sarah Tell, Lisa A. Sehgal, Ravinder N. M. Barker, Christopher M. Cornel, Anthony J. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: The role of vectors in the transmission of avian malaria parasites is currently understudied. Many studies that investigate parasite-vector relationships use limited trapping techniques and/or identify potential competent vectors in the field in such ways that cannot distinguish between an infected or infectious vector. Without the use of multiple trapping techniques that address the specific biology of diverse mosquito species, and without looking at the infection status of individual mosquitoes, it is not possible to make dependable conclusions on the role of mosquitoes in the transmission of avian malaria parasites. METHODS: We conducted two years of mosquito collections at a riparian preserve in California where a wide diversity of species were collected with multiple trap types. We hypothesized that competent mosquito species can influence the distribution and diversity of avian malaria parasites by acting as a compatibility filter for specific Plasmodium species. To determine the infection status of all individual mosquitoes for Plasmodium species/lineages, amplification within the cytochrome b gene was carried out on over 3000 individual mosquito thoraxes, and for those that tested positive we then repeated the same process for abdomens and salivary glands. RESULTS: Our data show heterogeneity in the transmissibility of Plasmodium among ornithophillic mosquito species. More specifically, Culex stigmatosoma appears to not be a vector of Plasmodium homopolare, a parasite that is prevalent in the avian population, but is a vector of multiple other Plasmodium species/lineages. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that conclusions made on the role of vectors from studies that do not use different mosquito trapping methods should be re-evaluated with caution, as we documented the potential for trapping biases, which may cause studies to miss important roles of specific mosquito species in the transmission of avian malaria. Moreover, we document heterogeneity in the transmission of Plasmodium spp. by mosquitoes can influence Plasmodium diversity and prevalence in specific locations to Plasmodium-vector incompatibilities. BioMed Central 2015-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4702297/ /pubmed/26160384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0969-0 Text en © Carlson et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Carlson, Jenny S.
Walther, Erika
TroutFryxell, Rebecca
Staley, Sarah
Tell, Lisa A.
Sehgal, Ravinder N. M.
Barker, Christopher M.
Cornel, Anthony J.
Identifying avian malaria vectors: sampling methods influence outcomes
title Identifying avian malaria vectors: sampling methods influence outcomes
title_full Identifying avian malaria vectors: sampling methods influence outcomes
title_fullStr Identifying avian malaria vectors: sampling methods influence outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Identifying avian malaria vectors: sampling methods influence outcomes
title_short Identifying avian malaria vectors: sampling methods influence outcomes
title_sort identifying avian malaria vectors: sampling methods influence outcomes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4702297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26160384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0969-0
work_keys_str_mv AT carlsonjennys identifyingavianmalariavectorssamplingmethodsinfluenceoutcomes
AT walthererika identifyingavianmalariavectorssamplingmethodsinfluenceoutcomes
AT troutfryxellrebecca identifyingavianmalariavectorssamplingmethodsinfluenceoutcomes
AT staleysarah identifyingavianmalariavectorssamplingmethodsinfluenceoutcomes
AT telllisaa identifyingavianmalariavectorssamplingmethodsinfluenceoutcomes
AT sehgalravindernm identifyingavianmalariavectorssamplingmethodsinfluenceoutcomes
AT barkerchristopherm identifyingavianmalariavectorssamplingmethodsinfluenceoutcomes
AT cornelanthonyj identifyingavianmalariavectorssamplingmethodsinfluenceoutcomes