Cargando…

Comparison of the results of laparoscopic appendectomies with application of different techniques for closure of the appendicular stump

BACKGROUND: Nowadays laparoscopy is used frequently not only in elective surgery but also in abdominal emergencies, including acute appendicitis. There are several techniques used to close the appendicular stump during laparoscopic appendectomy. The aim of the study was to present and compare the re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strzałka, Marcin, Matyja, Maciej, Rembiasz, Kazimierz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4702417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26740818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-015-0060-3
_version_ 1782408637979820032
author Strzałka, Marcin
Matyja, Maciej
Rembiasz, Kazimierz
author_facet Strzałka, Marcin
Matyja, Maciej
Rembiasz, Kazimierz
author_sort Strzałka, Marcin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nowadays laparoscopy is used frequently not only in elective surgery but also in abdominal emergencies, including acute appendicitis. There are several techniques used to close the appendicular stump during laparoscopic appendectomy. The aim of the study was to present and compare the results of minimally invasive appendectomies performed with the use of endoscopic staplers (group A), titanium endoclips (group B) and invaginating sutures (group C). METHODS: Three hundred seven patients (mean age = 35.6; SD = 15.9; 178 males,129 females) operated on laparoscopically for acute appendicitis from January 2010 to December 2014 at our department were included in the study. We reviewed retrospectively patients’ data including: age, sex, duration of the surgical procedure and hospital stay, mortality, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates in all analyzed groups. RESULTS: There were 102 patients in group A (mean age = 35.8;SD = 15.4; 57 males, 45 females). The average hospital stay in this group was 4.3 days (SD = 1.7), average operation time was 62.0 min (SD = 15), postoperative complication rate was 5.9 %. There were 160 patients in group B (mean age = 35.0; SD = 16.3; 96 males, 64 females). The average hospital stay in this group was 3.6 days (SD = 1.4), average operation time was 62.9 min (SD = 13.5), postoperative complication rate was 5.6 %. There were 45 patients in group C (mean age =37.3; SD = 15.8; 25 males, 20 females). The average hospital stay in this group was 4.6 days (SD = 2.0), average operation time was 73.9 min (SD = 20.8), postoperative complication rate was 6.7 %. There were no intraoperative complications and no mortality in all compared groups of patients operated on laparoscopically for acute appendicitis. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic appendectomies with application of different techniques for closure of the appendicular stump are useful and safe. In our study the shortest hospital stay and lowest complication rate were observed in patients operated with the use of titanium endoclips. The longest hospital stay and operation time and the highest complication rate was associated with the use of invaginating sutures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4702417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47024172016-01-07 Comparison of the results of laparoscopic appendectomies with application of different techniques for closure of the appendicular stump Strzałka, Marcin Matyja, Maciej Rembiasz, Kazimierz World J Emerg Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Nowadays laparoscopy is used frequently not only in elective surgery but also in abdominal emergencies, including acute appendicitis. There are several techniques used to close the appendicular stump during laparoscopic appendectomy. The aim of the study was to present and compare the results of minimally invasive appendectomies performed with the use of endoscopic staplers (group A), titanium endoclips (group B) and invaginating sutures (group C). METHODS: Three hundred seven patients (mean age = 35.6; SD = 15.9; 178 males,129 females) operated on laparoscopically for acute appendicitis from January 2010 to December 2014 at our department were included in the study. We reviewed retrospectively patients’ data including: age, sex, duration of the surgical procedure and hospital stay, mortality, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates in all analyzed groups. RESULTS: There were 102 patients in group A (mean age = 35.8;SD = 15.4; 57 males, 45 females). The average hospital stay in this group was 4.3 days (SD = 1.7), average operation time was 62.0 min (SD = 15), postoperative complication rate was 5.9 %. There were 160 patients in group B (mean age = 35.0; SD = 16.3; 96 males, 64 females). The average hospital stay in this group was 3.6 days (SD = 1.4), average operation time was 62.9 min (SD = 13.5), postoperative complication rate was 5.6 %. There were 45 patients in group C (mean age =37.3; SD = 15.8; 25 males, 20 females). The average hospital stay in this group was 4.6 days (SD = 2.0), average operation time was 73.9 min (SD = 20.8), postoperative complication rate was 6.7 %. There were no intraoperative complications and no mortality in all compared groups of patients operated on laparoscopically for acute appendicitis. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic appendectomies with application of different techniques for closure of the appendicular stump are useful and safe. In our study the shortest hospital stay and lowest complication rate were observed in patients operated with the use of titanium endoclips. The longest hospital stay and operation time and the highest complication rate was associated with the use of invaginating sutures. BioMed Central 2016-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4702417/ /pubmed/26740818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-015-0060-3 Text en © Strzałka et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Strzałka, Marcin
Matyja, Maciej
Rembiasz, Kazimierz
Comparison of the results of laparoscopic appendectomies with application of different techniques for closure of the appendicular stump
title Comparison of the results of laparoscopic appendectomies with application of different techniques for closure of the appendicular stump
title_full Comparison of the results of laparoscopic appendectomies with application of different techniques for closure of the appendicular stump
title_fullStr Comparison of the results of laparoscopic appendectomies with application of different techniques for closure of the appendicular stump
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the results of laparoscopic appendectomies with application of different techniques for closure of the appendicular stump
title_short Comparison of the results of laparoscopic appendectomies with application of different techniques for closure of the appendicular stump
title_sort comparison of the results of laparoscopic appendectomies with application of different techniques for closure of the appendicular stump
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4702417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26740818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-015-0060-3
work_keys_str_mv AT strzałkamarcin comparisonoftheresultsoflaparoscopicappendectomieswithapplicationofdifferenttechniquesforclosureoftheappendicularstump
AT matyjamaciej comparisonoftheresultsoflaparoscopicappendectomieswithapplicationofdifferenttechniquesforclosureoftheappendicularstump
AT rembiaszkazimierz comparisonoftheresultsoflaparoscopicappendectomieswithapplicationofdifferenttechniquesforclosureoftheappendicularstump