Cargando…

Collective agency and the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement: A practice-oriented analysis

BACKGROUND: Public involvement activities are promoted as measures for ensuring good governance in challenging fields, such as biomedical research and innovation. Proponents of public involvement activities include individual researchers as well as non-governmental and governmental organizations. Ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hainz, Tobias, Bossert, Sabine, Strech, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4702418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26732279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0083-z
_version_ 1782408638202118144
author Hainz, Tobias
Bossert, Sabine
Strech, Daniel
author_facet Hainz, Tobias
Bossert, Sabine
Strech, Daniel
author_sort Hainz, Tobias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Public involvement activities are promoted as measures for ensuring good governance in challenging fields, such as biomedical research and innovation. Proponents of public involvement activities include individual researchers as well as non-governmental and governmental organizations. However, the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement deserves more attention by researchers because it is not purely theoretical: it has important practical functions in the guidance, evaluation and translation of public involvement activities. DISCUSSION: This article focuses on collective agency as one property a public as a small group of participants in a public involvement activity could exhibit. It introduces a prominent theoretical approach to collective agents as one specific kind of social entities and demonstrates how this approach can be applied to current practice in public involvement activities. A brief discussion of different types of representation as they are used in the existing literature on this topic is also included because representation and collective agency can be closely related to each other. Suggestions and ideas that are derived from this reasoning include the proposal to use a ‘validity check’ for the generation of collective agents as a regular element of certain types of public involvement activities, the consequences of combining collective agency and representativeness as a further property a public could exhibit, and standards for reporting the content of public involvement activities in scientific publications. SUMMARY: This article discusses the importance of the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement activities, with a focus on biomedical research and innovation. It introduces various practically relevant ideas that are based on a theoretical analysis of collective agency as an important property a public can possess. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-015-0083-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4702418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47024182016-01-07 Collective agency and the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement: A practice-oriented analysis Hainz, Tobias Bossert, Sabine Strech, Daniel BMC Med Ethics Debate BACKGROUND: Public involvement activities are promoted as measures for ensuring good governance in challenging fields, such as biomedical research and innovation. Proponents of public involvement activities include individual researchers as well as non-governmental and governmental organizations. However, the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement deserves more attention by researchers because it is not purely theoretical: it has important practical functions in the guidance, evaluation and translation of public involvement activities. DISCUSSION: This article focuses on collective agency as one property a public as a small group of participants in a public involvement activity could exhibit. It introduces a prominent theoretical approach to collective agents as one specific kind of social entities and demonstrates how this approach can be applied to current practice in public involvement activities. A brief discussion of different types of representation as they are used in the existing literature on this topic is also included because representation and collective agency can be closely related to each other. Suggestions and ideas that are derived from this reasoning include the proposal to use a ‘validity check’ for the generation of collective agents as a regular element of certain types of public involvement activities, the consequences of combining collective agency and representativeness as a further property a public could exhibit, and standards for reporting the content of public involvement activities in scientific publications. SUMMARY: This article discusses the importance of the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement activities, with a focus on biomedical research and innovation. It introduces various practically relevant ideas that are based on a theoretical analysis of collective agency as an important property a public can possess. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-015-0083-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4702418/ /pubmed/26732279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0083-z Text en © Hainz et al. 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Hainz, Tobias
Bossert, Sabine
Strech, Daniel
Collective agency and the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement: A practice-oriented analysis
title Collective agency and the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement: A practice-oriented analysis
title_full Collective agency and the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement: A practice-oriented analysis
title_fullStr Collective agency and the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement: A practice-oriented analysis
title_full_unstemmed Collective agency and the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement: A practice-oriented analysis
title_short Collective agency and the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement: A practice-oriented analysis
title_sort collective agency and the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement: a practice-oriented analysis
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4702418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26732279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0083-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hainztobias collectiveagencyandtheconceptofpublicinpublicinvolvementapracticeorientedanalysis
AT bossertsabine collectiveagencyandtheconceptofpublicinpublicinvolvementapracticeorientedanalysis
AT strechdaniel collectiveagencyandtheconceptofpublicinpublicinvolvementapracticeorientedanalysis