Cargando…

The effect of different methods of intravenous injection on glass particle contamination from ampules

There have been many studies on glass particle contamination from glass ampules during the injection of glass ampules, but only the contamination from direct IV bolus injection has been measured. This research aimed to study the difference in glass particle contamination from ampules with different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joo, Ga Eul, Sohng, Kyeong-Yae, Park, Michael Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4703599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1632-0
_version_ 1782408750559133696
author Joo, Ga Eul
Sohng, Kyeong-Yae
Park, Michael Yong
author_facet Joo, Ga Eul
Sohng, Kyeong-Yae
Park, Michael Yong
author_sort Joo, Ga Eul
collection PubMed
description There have been many studies on glass particle contamination from glass ampules during the injection of glass ampules, but only the contamination from direct IV bolus injection has been measured. This research aimed to study the difference in glass particle contamination from ampules with different intravenous administration methods commonly used in clinical practice. Four methods were studied: IV bolus injection directly after immediate aspiration, IV bolus injection directly after 2 min’ delayed aspiration, IV bolus injection directly after aspiration with a filter needle, and side shooting to an infusion set with an in-line filter. 45 ampules per method for a total of 180 ampules were used. The number and length of glass particles were measured using a slide scanner. Aspiration was performed without specifically using a slow aspiration method. The longest glass particle was observed in the immediate aspiration group. The side shooting group showed the lowest maximum number of glass particles per ampule. The side shooting group also showed the smallest number of glass particles, but it was statistically insignificant. Using a filter needle syringe and 2 min’ delayed aspiration, which are frequently recommended to minimize contamination, may not be as effective as commonly believed, unless combined with a slow and low pressure aspiration method. Using a side shooting to an infusion set with an in-line filter may minimize glass particle contamination from ampules even without a slow and low pressure aspiration method, but more evidence from a larger study is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4703599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47035992016-01-12 The effect of different methods of intravenous injection on glass particle contamination from ampules Joo, Ga Eul Sohng, Kyeong-Yae Park, Michael Yong Springerplus Research There have been many studies on glass particle contamination from glass ampules during the injection of glass ampules, but only the contamination from direct IV bolus injection has been measured. This research aimed to study the difference in glass particle contamination from ampules with different intravenous administration methods commonly used in clinical practice. Four methods were studied: IV bolus injection directly after immediate aspiration, IV bolus injection directly after 2 min’ delayed aspiration, IV bolus injection directly after aspiration with a filter needle, and side shooting to an infusion set with an in-line filter. 45 ampules per method for a total of 180 ampules were used. The number and length of glass particles were measured using a slide scanner. Aspiration was performed without specifically using a slow aspiration method. The longest glass particle was observed in the immediate aspiration group. The side shooting group showed the lowest maximum number of glass particles per ampule. The side shooting group also showed the smallest number of glass particles, but it was statistically insignificant. Using a filter needle syringe and 2 min’ delayed aspiration, which are frequently recommended to minimize contamination, may not be as effective as commonly believed, unless combined with a slow and low pressure aspiration method. Using a side shooting to an infusion set with an in-line filter may minimize glass particle contamination from ampules even without a slow and low pressure aspiration method, but more evidence from a larger study is needed. Springer International Publishing 2016-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4703599/ /pubmed/26759754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1632-0 Text en © Joo et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Joo, Ga Eul
Sohng, Kyeong-Yae
Park, Michael Yong
The effect of different methods of intravenous injection on glass particle contamination from ampules
title The effect of different methods of intravenous injection on glass particle contamination from ampules
title_full The effect of different methods of intravenous injection on glass particle contamination from ampules
title_fullStr The effect of different methods of intravenous injection on glass particle contamination from ampules
title_full_unstemmed The effect of different methods of intravenous injection on glass particle contamination from ampules
title_short The effect of different methods of intravenous injection on glass particle contamination from ampules
title_sort effect of different methods of intravenous injection on glass particle contamination from ampules
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4703599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1632-0
work_keys_str_mv AT joogaeul theeffectofdifferentmethodsofintravenousinjectiononglassparticlecontaminationfromampules
AT sohngkyeongyae theeffectofdifferentmethodsofintravenousinjectiononglassparticlecontaminationfromampules
AT parkmichaelyong theeffectofdifferentmethodsofintravenousinjectiononglassparticlecontaminationfromampules
AT joogaeul effectofdifferentmethodsofintravenousinjectiononglassparticlecontaminationfromampules
AT sohngkyeongyae effectofdifferentmethodsofintravenousinjectiononglassparticlecontaminationfromampules
AT parkmichaelyong effectofdifferentmethodsofintravenousinjectiononglassparticlecontaminationfromampules