Cargando…
Selectivity of Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Membranes
Sulfonic acid-functionalized polymer electrolyte membranes alternative to Nafion(®) were developed. These were hydrocarbon systems, such as blend sulfonated polyetheretherketone (s-PEEK), new generation perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) systems, and composite zirconium phosphate–PFSA polymers. The membr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4704012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26610582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes5040793 |
_version_ | 1782408826509590528 |
---|---|
author | Aricò, Antonino S. Sebastian, David Schuster, Michael Bauer, Bernd D’Urso, Claudia Lufrano, Francesco Baglio, Vincenzo |
author_facet | Aricò, Antonino S. Sebastian, David Schuster, Michael Bauer, Bernd D’Urso, Claudia Lufrano, Francesco Baglio, Vincenzo |
author_sort | Aricò, Antonino S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sulfonic acid-functionalized polymer electrolyte membranes alternative to Nafion(®) were developed. These were hydrocarbon systems, such as blend sulfonated polyetheretherketone (s-PEEK), new generation perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) systems, and composite zirconium phosphate–PFSA polymers. The membranes varied in terms of composition, equivalent weight, thickness, and filler and were investigated with regard to their methanol permeation characteristics and proton conductivity for application in direct methanol fuel cells. The behavior of the membrane electrode assemblies (MEA) was investigated in fuel cell with the aim to individuate a correlation between membrane characteristics and their performance in a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC). The power density of the DMFC at 60 °C increased according to a square root-like function of the membrane selectivity. This was defined as the reciprocal of the product between area specific resistance and crossover. The power density achieved at 60 °C for the most promising s-PEEK-based membrane-electrode assembly (MEA) was higher than the benchmark Nafion(®) 115-based MEA (77 mW·cm(−2) vs. 64 mW·cm(−2)). This result was due to a lower methanol crossover (47 mA·cm(−2) equivalent current density for s-PEEK vs. 120 mA·cm(−2) for Nafion(®) 115 at 60 °C as recorded at OCV with 2 M methanol) and a suitable area specific resistance (0.15 Ohm cm(2) for s-PEEK vs. 0.22 Ohm cm(2) for Nafion(®) 115). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4704012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47040122016-01-21 Selectivity of Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Membranes Aricò, Antonino S. Sebastian, David Schuster, Michael Bauer, Bernd D’Urso, Claudia Lufrano, Francesco Baglio, Vincenzo Membranes (Basel) Article Sulfonic acid-functionalized polymer electrolyte membranes alternative to Nafion(®) were developed. These were hydrocarbon systems, such as blend sulfonated polyetheretherketone (s-PEEK), new generation perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) systems, and composite zirconium phosphate–PFSA polymers. The membranes varied in terms of composition, equivalent weight, thickness, and filler and were investigated with regard to their methanol permeation characteristics and proton conductivity for application in direct methanol fuel cells. The behavior of the membrane electrode assemblies (MEA) was investigated in fuel cell with the aim to individuate a correlation between membrane characteristics and their performance in a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC). The power density of the DMFC at 60 °C increased according to a square root-like function of the membrane selectivity. This was defined as the reciprocal of the product between area specific resistance and crossover. The power density achieved at 60 °C for the most promising s-PEEK-based membrane-electrode assembly (MEA) was higher than the benchmark Nafion(®) 115-based MEA (77 mW·cm(−2) vs. 64 mW·cm(−2)). This result was due to a lower methanol crossover (47 mA·cm(−2) equivalent current density for s-PEEK vs. 120 mA·cm(−2) for Nafion(®) 115 at 60 °C as recorded at OCV with 2 M methanol) and a suitable area specific resistance (0.15 Ohm cm(2) for s-PEEK vs. 0.22 Ohm cm(2) for Nafion(®) 115). MDPI 2015-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4704012/ /pubmed/26610582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes5040793 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Aricò, Antonino S. Sebastian, David Schuster, Michael Bauer, Bernd D’Urso, Claudia Lufrano, Francesco Baglio, Vincenzo Selectivity of Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Membranes |
title | Selectivity of Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Membranes |
title_full | Selectivity of Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Membranes |
title_fullStr | Selectivity of Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Membranes |
title_full_unstemmed | Selectivity of Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Membranes |
title_short | Selectivity of Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Membranes |
title_sort | selectivity of direct methanol fuel cell membranes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4704012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26610582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes5040793 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aricoantoninos selectivityofdirectmethanolfuelcellmembranes AT sebastiandavid selectivityofdirectmethanolfuelcellmembranes AT schustermichael selectivityofdirectmethanolfuelcellmembranes AT bauerbernd selectivityofdirectmethanolfuelcellmembranes AT dursoclaudia selectivityofdirectmethanolfuelcellmembranes AT lufranofrancesco selectivityofdirectmethanolfuelcellmembranes AT bagliovincenzo selectivityofdirectmethanolfuelcellmembranes |