Cargando…
Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC-GT) are easily purchased through the Internet, independent of a physician referral or approval for testing, allowing the retrieval of genetic information outside the clinical context. There is a broad debate about the testing validity, their impact o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4704942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26677835 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4378 |
_version_ | 1782408939202150400 |
---|---|
author | Covolo, Loredana Rubinelli, Sara Ceretti, Elisabetta Gelatti, Umberto |
author_facet | Covolo, Loredana Rubinelli, Sara Ceretti, Elisabetta Gelatti, Umberto |
author_sort | Covolo, Loredana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC-GT) are easily purchased through the Internet, independent of a physician referral or approval for testing, allowing the retrieval of genetic information outside the clinical context. There is a broad debate about the testing validity, their impact on individuals, and what people know and perceive about them. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to collect evidence on DTC-GT from a comprehensive perspective that unravels the complexity of the phenomenon. METHODS: A systematic search was carried out through PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Embase, in addition to Google Scholar according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist with the key term “Direct-to-consumer genetic test.” RESULTS: In the final sample, 118 articles were identified. Articles were summarized in five categories according to their focus on (1) knowledge of, attitude toward use of, and perception of DTC-GT (n=37), (2) the impact of genetic risk information on users (n=37), (3) the opinion of health professionals (n=20), (4) the content of websites selling DTC-GT (n=16), and (5) the scientific evidence and clinical utility of the tests (n=14). Most of the articles analyzed the attitude, knowledge, and perception of DTC-GT, highlighting an interest in using DTC-GT, along with the need for a health care professional to help interpret the results. The articles investigating the content analysis of the websites selling these tests are in agreement that the information provided by the companies about genetic testing is not completely comprehensive for the consumer. Given that risk information can modify consumers’ health behavior, there are surprisingly few studies carried out on actual consumers and they do not confirm the overall concerns on the possible impact of DTC-GT. Data from studies that investigate the quality of the tests offered confirm that they are not informative, have little predictive power, and do not measure genetic risk appropriately. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of DTC-GT on consumers’ health perceptions and behaviors is an emerging concern. However, negative effects on consumers or health benefits have yet to be observed. Nevertheless, since the online market of DTC-GT is expected to grow, it is important to remain aware of a possible impact. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4704942 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | JMIR Publications Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47049422016-01-12 Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review Covolo, Loredana Rubinelli, Sara Ceretti, Elisabetta Gelatti, Umberto J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC-GT) are easily purchased through the Internet, independent of a physician referral or approval for testing, allowing the retrieval of genetic information outside the clinical context. There is a broad debate about the testing validity, their impact on individuals, and what people know and perceive about them. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to collect evidence on DTC-GT from a comprehensive perspective that unravels the complexity of the phenomenon. METHODS: A systematic search was carried out through PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Embase, in addition to Google Scholar according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist with the key term “Direct-to-consumer genetic test.” RESULTS: In the final sample, 118 articles were identified. Articles were summarized in five categories according to their focus on (1) knowledge of, attitude toward use of, and perception of DTC-GT (n=37), (2) the impact of genetic risk information on users (n=37), (3) the opinion of health professionals (n=20), (4) the content of websites selling DTC-GT (n=16), and (5) the scientific evidence and clinical utility of the tests (n=14). Most of the articles analyzed the attitude, knowledge, and perception of DTC-GT, highlighting an interest in using DTC-GT, along with the need for a health care professional to help interpret the results. The articles investigating the content analysis of the websites selling these tests are in agreement that the information provided by the companies about genetic testing is not completely comprehensive for the consumer. Given that risk information can modify consumers’ health behavior, there are surprisingly few studies carried out on actual consumers and they do not confirm the overall concerns on the possible impact of DTC-GT. Data from studies that investigate the quality of the tests offered confirm that they are not informative, have little predictive power, and do not measure genetic risk appropriately. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of DTC-GT on consumers’ health perceptions and behaviors is an emerging concern. However, negative effects on consumers or health benefits have yet to be observed. Nevertheless, since the online market of DTC-GT is expected to grow, it is important to remain aware of a possible impact. JMIR Publications Inc. 2015-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4704942/ /pubmed/26677835 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4378 Text en ©Loredana Covolo, Sara Rubinelli, Elisabetta Ceretti, Umberto Gelatti. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 14.12.2015. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Covolo, Loredana Rubinelli, Sara Ceretti, Elisabetta Gelatti, Umberto Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review |
title | Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | internet-based direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a systematic review |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4704942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26677835 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4378 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT covololoredana internetbaseddirecttoconsumergenetictestingasystematicreview AT rubinellisara internetbaseddirecttoconsumergenetictestingasystematicreview AT cerettielisabetta internetbaseddirecttoconsumergenetictestingasystematicreview AT gelattiumberto internetbaseddirecttoconsumergenetictestingasystematicreview |