Cargando…

Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC-GT) are easily purchased through the Internet, independent of a physician referral or approval for testing, allowing the retrieval of genetic information outside the clinical context. There is a broad debate about the testing validity, their impact o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Covolo, Loredana, Rubinelli, Sara, Ceretti, Elisabetta, Gelatti, Umberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4704942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26677835
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4378
_version_ 1782408939202150400
author Covolo, Loredana
Rubinelli, Sara
Ceretti, Elisabetta
Gelatti, Umberto
author_facet Covolo, Loredana
Rubinelli, Sara
Ceretti, Elisabetta
Gelatti, Umberto
author_sort Covolo, Loredana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC-GT) are easily purchased through the Internet, independent of a physician referral or approval for testing, allowing the retrieval of genetic information outside the clinical context. There is a broad debate about the testing validity, their impact on individuals, and what people know and perceive about them. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to collect evidence on DTC-GT from a comprehensive perspective that unravels the complexity of the phenomenon. METHODS: A systematic search was carried out through PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Embase, in addition to Google Scholar according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist with the key term “Direct-to-consumer genetic test.” RESULTS: In the final sample, 118 articles were identified. Articles were summarized in five categories according to their focus on (1) knowledge of, attitude toward use of, and perception of DTC-GT (n=37), (2) the impact of genetic risk information on users (n=37), (3) the opinion of health professionals (n=20), (4) the content of websites selling DTC-GT (n=16), and (5) the scientific evidence and clinical utility of the tests (n=14). Most of the articles analyzed the attitude, knowledge, and perception of DTC-GT, highlighting an interest in using DTC-GT, along with the need for a health care professional to help interpret the results. The articles investigating the content analysis of the websites selling these tests are in agreement that the information provided by the companies about genetic testing is not completely comprehensive for the consumer. Given that risk information can modify consumers’ health behavior, there are surprisingly few studies carried out on actual consumers and they do not confirm the overall concerns on the possible impact of DTC-GT. Data from studies that investigate the quality of the tests offered confirm that they are not informative, have little predictive power, and do not measure genetic risk appropriately. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of DTC-GT on consumers’ health perceptions and behaviors is an emerging concern. However, negative effects on consumers or health benefits have yet to be observed. Nevertheless, since the online market of DTC-GT is expected to grow, it is important to remain aware of a possible impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4704942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47049422016-01-12 Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review Covolo, Loredana Rubinelli, Sara Ceretti, Elisabetta Gelatti, Umberto J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC-GT) are easily purchased through the Internet, independent of a physician referral or approval for testing, allowing the retrieval of genetic information outside the clinical context. There is a broad debate about the testing validity, their impact on individuals, and what people know and perceive about them. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to collect evidence on DTC-GT from a comprehensive perspective that unravels the complexity of the phenomenon. METHODS: A systematic search was carried out through PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Embase, in addition to Google Scholar according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist with the key term “Direct-to-consumer genetic test.” RESULTS: In the final sample, 118 articles were identified. Articles were summarized in five categories according to their focus on (1) knowledge of, attitude toward use of, and perception of DTC-GT (n=37), (2) the impact of genetic risk information on users (n=37), (3) the opinion of health professionals (n=20), (4) the content of websites selling DTC-GT (n=16), and (5) the scientific evidence and clinical utility of the tests (n=14). Most of the articles analyzed the attitude, knowledge, and perception of DTC-GT, highlighting an interest in using DTC-GT, along with the need for a health care professional to help interpret the results. The articles investigating the content analysis of the websites selling these tests are in agreement that the information provided by the companies about genetic testing is not completely comprehensive for the consumer. Given that risk information can modify consumers’ health behavior, there are surprisingly few studies carried out on actual consumers and they do not confirm the overall concerns on the possible impact of DTC-GT. Data from studies that investigate the quality of the tests offered confirm that they are not informative, have little predictive power, and do not measure genetic risk appropriately. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of DTC-GT on consumers’ health perceptions and behaviors is an emerging concern. However, negative effects on consumers or health benefits have yet to be observed. Nevertheless, since the online market of DTC-GT is expected to grow, it is important to remain aware of a possible impact. JMIR Publications Inc. 2015-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4704942/ /pubmed/26677835 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4378 Text en ©Loredana Covolo, Sara Rubinelli, Elisabetta Ceretti, Umberto Gelatti. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 14.12.2015. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Covolo, Loredana
Rubinelli, Sara
Ceretti, Elisabetta
Gelatti, Umberto
Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review
title Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review
title_full Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review
title_short Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review
title_sort internet-based direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a systematic review
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4704942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26677835
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4378
work_keys_str_mv AT covololoredana internetbaseddirecttoconsumergenetictestingasystematicreview
AT rubinellisara internetbaseddirecttoconsumergenetictestingasystematicreview
AT cerettielisabetta internetbaseddirecttoconsumergenetictestingasystematicreview
AT gelattiumberto internetbaseddirecttoconsumergenetictestingasystematicreview