Cargando…

Review and Evaluation of Mindfulness-Based iPhone Apps

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence for the positive impact of mindfulness on wellbeing. Mindfulness-based mobile apps may have potential as an alternative delivery medium for training. While there are hundreds of such apps, there is little information on their quality. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mani, Madhavan, Kavanagh, David J, Hides, Leanne, Stoyanov, Stoyan R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4705029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26290327
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4328
_version_ 1782408954237681664
author Mani, Madhavan
Kavanagh, David J
Hides, Leanne
Stoyanov, Stoyan R
author_facet Mani, Madhavan
Kavanagh, David J
Hides, Leanne
Stoyanov, Stoyan R
author_sort Mani, Madhavan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence for the positive impact of mindfulness on wellbeing. Mindfulness-based mobile apps may have potential as an alternative delivery medium for training. While there are hundreds of such apps, there is little information on their quality. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of mindfulness-based iPhone mobile apps and to evaluate their quality using a recently-developed expert rating scale, the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). It also aimed to describe features of selected high-quality mindfulness apps. METHODS: A search for “mindfulness” was conducted in iTunes and Google Apps Marketplace. Apps that provided mindfulness training and education were included. Those containing only reminders, timers or guided meditation tracks were excluded. An expert rater reviewed and rated app quality using the MARS engagement, functionality, visual aesthetics, information quality and subjective quality subscales. A second rater provided MARS ratings on 30% of the apps for inter-rater reliability purposes. RESULTS: The “mindfulness” search identified 700 apps. However, 94 were duplicates, 6 were not accessible and 40 were not in English. Of the remaining 560, 23 apps met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. The median MARS score was 3.2 (out of 5.0), which exceeded the minimum acceptable score (3.0). The Headspace app had the highest average score (4.0), followed by Smiling Mind (3.7), iMindfulness (3.5) and Mindfulness Daily (3.5). There was a high level of inter-rater reliability between the two MARS raters. CONCLUSIONS: Though many apps claim to be mindfulness-related, most were guided meditation apps, timers, or reminders. Very few had high ratings on the MARS subscales of visual aesthetics, engagement, functionality or information quality. Little evidence is available on the efficacy of the apps in developing mindfulness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4705029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47050292016-01-12 Review and Evaluation of Mindfulness-Based iPhone Apps Mani, Madhavan Kavanagh, David J Hides, Leanne Stoyanov, Stoyan R JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence for the positive impact of mindfulness on wellbeing. Mindfulness-based mobile apps may have potential as an alternative delivery medium for training. While there are hundreds of such apps, there is little information on their quality. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of mindfulness-based iPhone mobile apps and to evaluate their quality using a recently-developed expert rating scale, the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). It also aimed to describe features of selected high-quality mindfulness apps. METHODS: A search for “mindfulness” was conducted in iTunes and Google Apps Marketplace. Apps that provided mindfulness training and education were included. Those containing only reminders, timers or guided meditation tracks were excluded. An expert rater reviewed and rated app quality using the MARS engagement, functionality, visual aesthetics, information quality and subjective quality subscales. A second rater provided MARS ratings on 30% of the apps for inter-rater reliability purposes. RESULTS: The “mindfulness” search identified 700 apps. However, 94 were duplicates, 6 were not accessible and 40 were not in English. Of the remaining 560, 23 apps met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. The median MARS score was 3.2 (out of 5.0), which exceeded the minimum acceptable score (3.0). The Headspace app had the highest average score (4.0), followed by Smiling Mind (3.7), iMindfulness (3.5) and Mindfulness Daily (3.5). There was a high level of inter-rater reliability between the two MARS raters. CONCLUSIONS: Though many apps claim to be mindfulness-related, most were guided meditation apps, timers, or reminders. Very few had high ratings on the MARS subscales of visual aesthetics, engagement, functionality or information quality. Little evidence is available on the efficacy of the apps in developing mindfulness. JMIR Publications Inc. 2015-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4705029/ /pubmed/26290327 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4328 Text en ©Madhavan Mani, David J Kavanagh, Leanne Hides, Stoyan R Stoyanov. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 19.08.2015. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Mani, Madhavan
Kavanagh, David J
Hides, Leanne
Stoyanov, Stoyan R
Review and Evaluation of Mindfulness-Based iPhone Apps
title Review and Evaluation of Mindfulness-Based iPhone Apps
title_full Review and Evaluation of Mindfulness-Based iPhone Apps
title_fullStr Review and Evaluation of Mindfulness-Based iPhone Apps
title_full_unstemmed Review and Evaluation of Mindfulness-Based iPhone Apps
title_short Review and Evaluation of Mindfulness-Based iPhone Apps
title_sort review and evaluation of mindfulness-based iphone apps
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4705029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26290327
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4328
work_keys_str_mv AT manimadhavan reviewandevaluationofmindfulnessbasediphoneapps
AT kavanaghdavidj reviewandevaluationofmindfulnessbasediphoneapps
AT hidesleanne reviewandevaluationofmindfulnessbasediphoneapps
AT stoyanovstoyanr reviewandevaluationofmindfulnessbasediphoneapps