Cargando…
Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview
Best-worst scaling (BWS), also known as maximum-difference scaling, is a multiattribute approach to measuring preferences. BWS aims at the analysis of preferences regarding a set of attributes, their levels or alternatives. It is a stated-preference method based on the assumption that respondents ar...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4705077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26743636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x |
_version_ | 1782408964130996224 |
---|---|
author | Mühlbacher, Axel C. Kaczynski, Anika Zweifel, Peter Johnson, F. Reed |
author_facet | Mühlbacher, Axel C. Kaczynski, Anika Zweifel, Peter Johnson, F. Reed |
author_sort | Mühlbacher, Axel C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Best-worst scaling (BWS), also known as maximum-difference scaling, is a multiattribute approach to measuring preferences. BWS aims at the analysis of preferences regarding a set of attributes, their levels or alternatives. It is a stated-preference method based on the assumption that respondents are capable of making judgments regarding the best and the worst (or the most and least important, respectively) out of three or more elements of a choice-set. As is true of discrete choice experiments (DCE) generally, BWS avoids the known weaknesses of rating and ranking scales while holding the promise of generating additional information by making respondents choose twice, namely the best as well as the worst criteria. A systematic literature review found 53 BWS applications in health and healthcare. This article expounds possibilities of application, the underlying theoretical concepts and the implementation of BWS in its three variants: ‘object case’, ‘profile case’, ‘multiprofile case’. This paper contains a survey of BWS methods and revolves around study design, experimental design, and data analysis. Moreover the article discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the three types of BWS distinguished and offered an outlook. A companion paper focuses on special issues of theory and statistical inference confronting BWS in preference measurement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4705077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47050772016-01-18 Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview Mühlbacher, Axel C. Kaczynski, Anika Zweifel, Peter Johnson, F. Reed Health Econ Rev Research Best-worst scaling (BWS), also known as maximum-difference scaling, is a multiattribute approach to measuring preferences. BWS aims at the analysis of preferences regarding a set of attributes, their levels or alternatives. It is a stated-preference method based on the assumption that respondents are capable of making judgments regarding the best and the worst (or the most and least important, respectively) out of three or more elements of a choice-set. As is true of discrete choice experiments (DCE) generally, BWS avoids the known weaknesses of rating and ranking scales while holding the promise of generating additional information by making respondents choose twice, namely the best as well as the worst criteria. A systematic literature review found 53 BWS applications in health and healthcare. This article expounds possibilities of application, the underlying theoretical concepts and the implementation of BWS in its three variants: ‘object case’, ‘profile case’, ‘multiprofile case’. This paper contains a survey of BWS methods and revolves around study design, experimental design, and data analysis. Moreover the article discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the three types of BWS distinguished and offered an outlook. A companion paper focuses on special issues of theory and statistical inference confronting BWS in preference measurement. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4705077/ /pubmed/26743636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x Text en © Mühlbacher et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Mühlbacher, Axel C. Kaczynski, Anika Zweifel, Peter Johnson, F. Reed Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview |
title | Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview |
title_full | Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview |
title_fullStr | Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview |
title_short | Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview |
title_sort | experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4705077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26743636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muhlbacheraxelc experimentalmeasurementofpreferencesinhealthandhealthcareusingbestworstscalinganoverview AT kaczynskianika experimentalmeasurementofpreferencesinhealthandhealthcareusingbestworstscalinganoverview AT zweifelpeter experimentalmeasurementofpreferencesinhealthandhealthcareusingbestworstscalinganoverview AT johnsonfreed experimentalmeasurementofpreferencesinhealthandhealthcareusingbestworstscalinganoverview |