Cargando…

Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial

The objective of this study was to compare the stability, survival, and tolerability of 2 percutaneous osseointegrated titanium implants for bone conduction hearing: a 4.5-mm diameter implant (test) and a 3.75-mm diameter implant (control). Fifty-seven adult patients were included in this randomized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nelissen, Rik C., den Besten, Christine A., Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M., Hol, Myrthe K. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4705128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25790770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3593-x
_version_ 1782408974405992448
author Nelissen, Rik C.
den Besten, Christine A.
Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
Hol, Myrthe K. S.
author_facet Nelissen, Rik C.
den Besten, Christine A.
Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
Hol, Myrthe K. S.
author_sort Nelissen, Rik C.
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to compare the stability, survival, and tolerability of 2 percutaneous osseointegrated titanium implants for bone conduction hearing: a 4.5-mm diameter implant (test) and a 3.75-mm diameter implant (control). Fifty-seven adult patients were included in this randomized controlled clinical trial. Sixty implants were allocated in a 2:1 (test–control) ratio. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days; 6 and 12 weeks; and 6 months. At every visit, implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were recorded by means of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and skin reactions were evaluated according to the Holgers classification. Implants were loaded with the bone conduction device at 3 weeks. Hearing-related quality of life was evaluated using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), and the Glasgow Health Status Inventory (GHSI). ISQ values were statistically significantly higher for the test implant compared to the control implant. No implants were lost and soft tissue reactions were comparable for both implants. Positive results were reported in the hearing-related quality of life questionnaires. These 6-month results indicate that both implants and their corresponding hearing devices are safe options for hearing rehabilitation in patients with the appropriate indications. Loading at 3 weeks did not affect the stability of either implant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4705128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47051282016-01-18 Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial Nelissen, Rik C. den Besten, Christine A. Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M. Hol, Myrthe K. S. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology The objective of this study was to compare the stability, survival, and tolerability of 2 percutaneous osseointegrated titanium implants for bone conduction hearing: a 4.5-mm diameter implant (test) and a 3.75-mm diameter implant (control). Fifty-seven adult patients were included in this randomized controlled clinical trial. Sixty implants were allocated in a 2:1 (test–control) ratio. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days; 6 and 12 weeks; and 6 months. At every visit, implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were recorded by means of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and skin reactions were evaluated according to the Holgers classification. Implants were loaded with the bone conduction device at 3 weeks. Hearing-related quality of life was evaluated using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), and the Glasgow Health Status Inventory (GHSI). ISQ values were statistically significantly higher for the test implant compared to the control implant. No implants were lost and soft tissue reactions were comparable for both implants. Positive results were reported in the hearing-related quality of life questionnaires. These 6-month results indicate that both implants and their corresponding hearing devices are safe options for hearing rehabilitation in patients with the appropriate indications. Loading at 3 weeks did not affect the stability of either implant. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-03-20 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4705128/ /pubmed/25790770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3593-x Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Otology
Nelissen, Rik C.
den Besten, Christine A.
Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
Hol, Myrthe K. S.
Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial
title Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial
topic Otology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4705128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25790770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3593-x
work_keys_str_mv AT nelissenrikc stabilitysurvivalandtolerabilityofa45mmwideboneanchoredhearingimplant6monthdatafromarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT denbestenchristinea stabilitysurvivalandtolerabilityofa45mmwideboneanchoredhearingimplant6monthdatafromarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT mylanusemmanuelam stabilitysurvivalandtolerabilityofa45mmwideboneanchoredhearingimplant6monthdatafromarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT holmyrtheks stabilitysurvivalandtolerabilityofa45mmwideboneanchoredhearingimplant6monthdatafromarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial