Cargando…
Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques
PURPOSE: To compare and determine the repeatability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using four noncontact pachymetry instruments in eyes with keratoconus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CCT of consecutive patients with keratoconus was measured during a single visit using the swept source...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4705708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26632128 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.170987 |
_version_ | 1782409065142419456 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Mukesh Shetty, Rohit Jayadev, Chaitra Dutta, Debarun |
author_facet | Kumar, Mukesh Shetty, Rohit Jayadev, Chaitra Dutta, Debarun |
author_sort | Kumar, Mukesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare and determine the repeatability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using four noncontact pachymetry instruments in eyes with keratoconus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CCT of consecutive patients with keratoconus was measured during a single visit using the swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT, Casia SS-1000°CT, Tomey, Nagoya, Japan), a rotating Scheimpflug camera system (Pentacam, Oculus Optikgerate GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), scanning slit topographer (Orbscan IIz topography, Baush and Lomb Surgical Inc., San Dimas, CA, USA), and a hand-held spectral domain OCT (HHSD-OCT, Bioptigen Inc., Durham, North Carolina, USA). Test-retest variability, correlation between measurements and interdevice agreement were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty eyes of 25 participants were analyzed in this study. All measurement methods correlated well with each other (r > 0.9, P < 0.001). Mean ± standard deviation CCT measured by HHSD-OCT, Orbscan IIz, SS-OCT, and Pentacam was 462 ± 41 μm, 458 ± 41 μm, 454 ± 40 μm, and 447 ± 42 μm, respectively. While the HHSD-OCT over-estimated the CCT (P < 0.001), there was a good correlation between the measurements obtained from the other three devices. However, the numerical difference was high and this trend was seen in all the paired comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Though the measurements by different devices correlated well, the numerical agreement may be inadequate for their interchangeable use in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4705708 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47057082016-01-22 Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques Kumar, Mukesh Shetty, Rohit Jayadev, Chaitra Dutta, Debarun Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare and determine the repeatability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using four noncontact pachymetry instruments in eyes with keratoconus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CCT of consecutive patients with keratoconus was measured during a single visit using the swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT, Casia SS-1000°CT, Tomey, Nagoya, Japan), a rotating Scheimpflug camera system (Pentacam, Oculus Optikgerate GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), scanning slit topographer (Orbscan IIz topography, Baush and Lomb Surgical Inc., San Dimas, CA, USA), and a hand-held spectral domain OCT (HHSD-OCT, Bioptigen Inc., Durham, North Carolina, USA). Test-retest variability, correlation between measurements and interdevice agreement were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty eyes of 25 participants were analyzed in this study. All measurement methods correlated well with each other (r > 0.9, P < 0.001). Mean ± standard deviation CCT measured by HHSD-OCT, Orbscan IIz, SS-OCT, and Pentacam was 462 ± 41 μm, 458 ± 41 μm, 454 ± 40 μm, and 447 ± 42 μm, respectively. While the HHSD-OCT over-estimated the CCT (P < 0.001), there was a good correlation between the measurements obtained from the other three devices. However, the numerical difference was high and this trend was seen in all the paired comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Though the measurements by different devices correlated well, the numerical agreement may be inadequate for their interchangeable use in clinical practice. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4705708/ /pubmed/26632128 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.170987 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kumar, Mukesh Shetty, Rohit Jayadev, Chaitra Dutta, Debarun Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques |
title | Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques |
title_full | Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques |
title_fullStr | Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques |
title_short | Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques |
title_sort | comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4705708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26632128 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.170987 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarmukesh comparabilityandrepeatabilityofpachymetryinkeratoconususingfournoncontacttechniques AT shettyrohit comparabilityandrepeatabilityofpachymetryinkeratoconususingfournoncontacttechniques AT jayadevchaitra comparabilityandrepeatabilityofpachymetryinkeratoconususingfournoncontacttechniques AT duttadebarun comparabilityandrepeatabilityofpachymetryinkeratoconususingfournoncontacttechniques |