Cargando…

Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques

PURPOSE: To compare and determine the repeatability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using four noncontact pachymetry instruments in eyes with keratoconus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CCT of consecutive patients with keratoconus was measured during a single visit using the swept source...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Mukesh, Shetty, Rohit, Jayadev, Chaitra, Dutta, Debarun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4705708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26632128
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.170987
_version_ 1782409065142419456
author Kumar, Mukesh
Shetty, Rohit
Jayadev, Chaitra
Dutta, Debarun
author_facet Kumar, Mukesh
Shetty, Rohit
Jayadev, Chaitra
Dutta, Debarun
author_sort Kumar, Mukesh
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare and determine the repeatability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using four noncontact pachymetry instruments in eyes with keratoconus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CCT of consecutive patients with keratoconus was measured during a single visit using the swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT, Casia SS-1000°CT, Tomey, Nagoya, Japan), a rotating Scheimpflug camera system (Pentacam, Oculus Optikgerate GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), scanning slit topographer (Orbscan IIz topography, Baush and Lomb Surgical Inc., San Dimas, CA, USA), and a hand-held spectral domain OCT (HHSD-OCT, Bioptigen Inc., Durham, North Carolina, USA). Test-retest variability, correlation between measurements and interdevice agreement were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty eyes of 25 participants were analyzed in this study. All measurement methods correlated well with each other (r > 0.9, P < 0.001). Mean ± standard deviation CCT measured by HHSD-OCT, Orbscan IIz, SS-OCT, and Pentacam was 462 ± 41 μm, 458 ± 41 μm, 454 ± 40 μm, and 447 ± 42 μm, respectively. While the HHSD-OCT over-estimated the CCT (P < 0.001), there was a good correlation between the measurements obtained from the other three devices. However, the numerical difference was high and this trend was seen in all the paired comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Though the measurements by different devices correlated well, the numerical agreement may be inadequate for their interchangeable use in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4705708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47057082016-01-22 Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques Kumar, Mukesh Shetty, Rohit Jayadev, Chaitra Dutta, Debarun Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare and determine the repeatability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using four noncontact pachymetry instruments in eyes with keratoconus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CCT of consecutive patients with keratoconus was measured during a single visit using the swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT, Casia SS-1000°CT, Tomey, Nagoya, Japan), a rotating Scheimpflug camera system (Pentacam, Oculus Optikgerate GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), scanning slit topographer (Orbscan IIz topography, Baush and Lomb Surgical Inc., San Dimas, CA, USA), and a hand-held spectral domain OCT (HHSD-OCT, Bioptigen Inc., Durham, North Carolina, USA). Test-retest variability, correlation between measurements and interdevice agreement were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty eyes of 25 participants were analyzed in this study. All measurement methods correlated well with each other (r > 0.9, P < 0.001). Mean ± standard deviation CCT measured by HHSD-OCT, Orbscan IIz, SS-OCT, and Pentacam was 462 ± 41 μm, 458 ± 41 μm, 454 ± 40 μm, and 447 ± 42 μm, respectively. While the HHSD-OCT over-estimated the CCT (P < 0.001), there was a good correlation between the measurements obtained from the other three devices. However, the numerical difference was high and this trend was seen in all the paired comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Though the measurements by different devices correlated well, the numerical agreement may be inadequate for their interchangeable use in clinical practice. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4705708/ /pubmed/26632128 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.170987 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumar, Mukesh
Shetty, Rohit
Jayadev, Chaitra
Dutta, Debarun
Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques
title Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques
title_full Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques
title_fullStr Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques
title_full_unstemmed Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques
title_short Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques
title_sort comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4705708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26632128
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.170987
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarmukesh comparabilityandrepeatabilityofpachymetryinkeratoconususingfournoncontacttechniques
AT shettyrohit comparabilityandrepeatabilityofpachymetryinkeratoconususingfournoncontacttechniques
AT jayadevchaitra comparabilityandrepeatabilityofpachymetryinkeratoconususingfournoncontacttechniques
AT duttadebarun comparabilityandrepeatabilityofpachymetryinkeratoconususingfournoncontacttechniques