Cargando…

Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue

BACKGROUND: Laser capture microdissection offers unique possibilities for the isolation of specific cell populations or histological structures. However, isolation of RNA from microdissected tissue is challenging due to degradation and minimal yield of RNA during laser capture microdissection (LCM)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolijn, Kimberley, van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4705748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26744212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1813-5
_version_ 1782409074209456128
author Kolijn, Kimberley
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
author_facet Kolijn, Kimberley
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
author_sort Kolijn, Kimberley
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laser capture microdissection offers unique possibilities for the isolation of specific cell populations or histological structures. However, isolation of RNA from microdissected tissue is challenging due to degradation and minimal yield of RNA during laser capture microdissection (LCM). Our aim was to optimize the isolation of high-quality RNA from laser capture microdissected fresh frozen prostate tissue on the level of staining and RNA extraction. RESULTS: Cresyl violet and haematoxylin were compared as histological stains for LCM. While RNA quality was similar for cresyl violet (median RIN 7.4) and haematoxylin (median RIN 7.6), tissue morphology was more detailed with cresyl violet as compared to haematoxylin. RNA quality from the following kits was compared: RNeasy(®) Micro (median RIN 7.2), miRNeasy Mini (median RIN 6.6), Picopure(®) (median RIN 6.0), mirVana™ miRNA (median RIN 6.5) and RNAqueous(®)-Micro (median RIN 6.3). RNA quality from microdissected samples with either the RNeasy Micro or miRNeasy Mini kit, was comparable to RNA isolated directly from whole tissue slices (median RIN 7.5, p = 0.09). Isolated RNA from benign and prostate cancer microdissected tissue demonstrated that RNA quality can vary between regions from the same clinical sample. Additionally, RNA quality (r = 0.89), but not quantity (r = 0.69) could be precisely measured with the Agilent Bioanalyzer. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that staining with cresyl violet results in the isolation of high quality RNA from laser capture microdissected tissue with high discriminative morphology. The RNeasy Micro and miRNeasy Mini RNA extraction kits generated the highest quality RNA compared to Picopure, mirVana and RNAqueous with minimal loss of RNA quality during LCM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1813-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4705748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47057482016-01-09 Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue Kolijn, Kimberley van Leenders, Geert J. L. H. BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: Laser capture microdissection offers unique possibilities for the isolation of specific cell populations or histological structures. However, isolation of RNA from microdissected tissue is challenging due to degradation and minimal yield of RNA during laser capture microdissection (LCM). Our aim was to optimize the isolation of high-quality RNA from laser capture microdissected fresh frozen prostate tissue on the level of staining and RNA extraction. RESULTS: Cresyl violet and haematoxylin were compared as histological stains for LCM. While RNA quality was similar for cresyl violet (median RIN 7.4) and haematoxylin (median RIN 7.6), tissue morphology was more detailed with cresyl violet as compared to haematoxylin. RNA quality from the following kits was compared: RNeasy(®) Micro (median RIN 7.2), miRNeasy Mini (median RIN 6.6), Picopure(®) (median RIN 6.0), mirVana™ miRNA (median RIN 6.5) and RNAqueous(®)-Micro (median RIN 6.3). RNA quality from microdissected samples with either the RNeasy Micro or miRNeasy Mini kit, was comparable to RNA isolated directly from whole tissue slices (median RIN 7.5, p = 0.09). Isolated RNA from benign and prostate cancer microdissected tissue demonstrated that RNA quality can vary between regions from the same clinical sample. Additionally, RNA quality (r = 0.89), but not quantity (r = 0.69) could be precisely measured with the Agilent Bioanalyzer. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that staining with cresyl violet results in the isolation of high quality RNA from laser capture microdissected tissue with high discriminative morphology. The RNeasy Micro and miRNeasy Mini RNA extraction kits generated the highest quality RNA compared to Picopure, mirVana and RNAqueous with minimal loss of RNA quality during LCM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1813-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4705748/ /pubmed/26744212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1813-5 Text en © Kolijn and van Leenders. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Kolijn, Kimberley
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue
title Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue
title_full Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue
title_fullStr Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue
title_short Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue
title_sort comparison of rna extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4705748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26744212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1813-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kolijnkimberley comparisonofrnaextractionkitsandhistologicalstainsforlasercapturemicrodissectedprostatetissue
AT vanleendersgeertjlh comparisonofrnaextractionkitsandhistologicalstainsforlasercapturemicrodissectedprostatetissue