Cargando…
Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue
BACKGROUND: Laser capture microdissection offers unique possibilities for the isolation of specific cell populations or histological structures. However, isolation of RNA from microdissected tissue is challenging due to degradation and minimal yield of RNA during laser capture microdissection (LCM)....
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4705748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26744212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1813-5 |
_version_ | 1782409074209456128 |
---|---|
author | Kolijn, Kimberley van Leenders, Geert J. L. H. |
author_facet | Kolijn, Kimberley van Leenders, Geert J. L. H. |
author_sort | Kolijn, Kimberley |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Laser capture microdissection offers unique possibilities for the isolation of specific cell populations or histological structures. However, isolation of RNA from microdissected tissue is challenging due to degradation and minimal yield of RNA during laser capture microdissection (LCM). Our aim was to optimize the isolation of high-quality RNA from laser capture microdissected fresh frozen prostate tissue on the level of staining and RNA extraction. RESULTS: Cresyl violet and haematoxylin were compared as histological stains for LCM. While RNA quality was similar for cresyl violet (median RIN 7.4) and haematoxylin (median RIN 7.6), tissue morphology was more detailed with cresyl violet as compared to haematoxylin. RNA quality from the following kits was compared: RNeasy(®) Micro (median RIN 7.2), miRNeasy Mini (median RIN 6.6), Picopure(®) (median RIN 6.0), mirVana™ miRNA (median RIN 6.5) and RNAqueous(®)-Micro (median RIN 6.3). RNA quality from microdissected samples with either the RNeasy Micro or miRNeasy Mini kit, was comparable to RNA isolated directly from whole tissue slices (median RIN 7.5, p = 0.09). Isolated RNA from benign and prostate cancer microdissected tissue demonstrated that RNA quality can vary between regions from the same clinical sample. Additionally, RNA quality (r = 0.89), but not quantity (r = 0.69) could be precisely measured with the Agilent Bioanalyzer. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that staining with cresyl violet results in the isolation of high quality RNA from laser capture microdissected tissue with high discriminative morphology. The RNeasy Micro and miRNeasy Mini RNA extraction kits generated the highest quality RNA compared to Picopure, mirVana and RNAqueous with minimal loss of RNA quality during LCM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1813-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4705748 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47057482016-01-09 Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue Kolijn, Kimberley van Leenders, Geert J. L. H. BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: Laser capture microdissection offers unique possibilities for the isolation of specific cell populations or histological structures. However, isolation of RNA from microdissected tissue is challenging due to degradation and minimal yield of RNA during laser capture microdissection (LCM). Our aim was to optimize the isolation of high-quality RNA from laser capture microdissected fresh frozen prostate tissue on the level of staining and RNA extraction. RESULTS: Cresyl violet and haematoxylin were compared as histological stains for LCM. While RNA quality was similar for cresyl violet (median RIN 7.4) and haematoxylin (median RIN 7.6), tissue morphology was more detailed with cresyl violet as compared to haematoxylin. RNA quality from the following kits was compared: RNeasy(®) Micro (median RIN 7.2), miRNeasy Mini (median RIN 6.6), Picopure(®) (median RIN 6.0), mirVana™ miRNA (median RIN 6.5) and RNAqueous(®)-Micro (median RIN 6.3). RNA quality from microdissected samples with either the RNeasy Micro or miRNeasy Mini kit, was comparable to RNA isolated directly from whole tissue slices (median RIN 7.5, p = 0.09). Isolated RNA from benign and prostate cancer microdissected tissue demonstrated that RNA quality can vary between regions from the same clinical sample. Additionally, RNA quality (r = 0.89), but not quantity (r = 0.69) could be precisely measured with the Agilent Bioanalyzer. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that staining with cresyl violet results in the isolation of high quality RNA from laser capture microdissected tissue with high discriminative morphology. The RNeasy Micro and miRNeasy Mini RNA extraction kits generated the highest quality RNA compared to Picopure, mirVana and RNAqueous with minimal loss of RNA quality during LCM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1813-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4705748/ /pubmed/26744212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1813-5 Text en © Kolijn and van Leenders. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Kolijn, Kimberley van Leenders, Geert J. L. H. Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue |
title | Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue |
title_full | Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue |
title_fullStr | Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue |
title_short | Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue |
title_sort | comparison of rna extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4705748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26744212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1813-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kolijnkimberley comparisonofrnaextractionkitsandhistologicalstainsforlasercapturemicrodissectedprostatetissue AT vanleendersgeertjlh comparisonofrnaextractionkitsandhistologicalstainsforlasercapturemicrodissectedprostatetissue |