Cargando…

Immediate screening of lead exposure in the workplace using portable X-ray fluorescence

The use of a portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (PXRF) equipped with a miniaturised X-ray tube producing a small 8 mm diameter X-ray beam required the validation of two new sampling protocols for the immediate screening of occupational lead exposure. First, lead in dust and fumes, collected by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorce, Jean-Philippe, Roff, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26713915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2015.1091959
_version_ 1782409108770521088
author Gorce, Jean-Philippe
Roff, Martin
author_facet Gorce, Jean-Philippe
Roff, Martin
author_sort Gorce, Jean-Philippe
collection PubMed
description The use of a portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (PXRF) equipped with a miniaturised X-ray tube producing a small 8 mm diameter X-ray beam required the validation of two new sampling protocols for the immediate screening of occupational lead exposure. First, lead in dust and fumes, collected by Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM) inhalable samplers on 25 mm diameter membrane filters, is quantified using PXRF. To account for irregular dust deposition, the filters are rotated manually by quarter turns. Multiple PXRF readings are collected from the central region and from two locations in the outer region. The inner region is distinguishable from the outer region, but the two outer region locations are indistinguishable. High correlations (R(2) > 0.99) are found between the PXRF results and historical results obtained using a reference method based on a laboratory wavelength-dispersive sequential XRF instrument (WDXRF) for lead loadings between 1–161 μg. The PXRF results from the outer regions of the filters show a bias of −13% with respect to the WDXRF. Once this bias is allowed for, 95% of all PXRF results lie within −28% and +38% of the WDXRF results. Neither instrument accounts for potential dust accumulation on the walls of the IOM sampler. Therefore, methods based on their use can only be considered semi-quantitative. Second, a protocol combining direct PXRF measurements on workplace surfaces with surface wipes is designed for immediate on-site quantification of removable surface lead residues. The quantification of such residues by this method is compared with subsequent off-site wet chemistry analysis of the surface wipes. The two methods show a good correlation (R(2) ∼ 0.88). The ratio of the amount of removable residues determined by PXRF and wipe sampling is close to one with range 0.26–3.94. It is demonstrated that PXRF can be used as an effective tool for the immediate screening of occupational lead exposure. Although this article focused on lead, PXRF can identify simultaneously a number of other metals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4706026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47060262016-01-22 Immediate screening of lead exposure in the workplace using portable X-ray fluorescence Gorce, Jean-Philippe Roff, Martin J Occup Environ Hyg Original Articles The use of a portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (PXRF) equipped with a miniaturised X-ray tube producing a small 8 mm diameter X-ray beam required the validation of two new sampling protocols for the immediate screening of occupational lead exposure. First, lead in dust and fumes, collected by Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM) inhalable samplers on 25 mm diameter membrane filters, is quantified using PXRF. To account for irregular dust deposition, the filters are rotated manually by quarter turns. Multiple PXRF readings are collected from the central region and from two locations in the outer region. The inner region is distinguishable from the outer region, but the two outer region locations are indistinguishable. High correlations (R(2) > 0.99) are found between the PXRF results and historical results obtained using a reference method based on a laboratory wavelength-dispersive sequential XRF instrument (WDXRF) for lead loadings between 1–161 μg. The PXRF results from the outer regions of the filters show a bias of −13% with respect to the WDXRF. Once this bias is allowed for, 95% of all PXRF results lie within −28% and +38% of the WDXRF results. Neither instrument accounts for potential dust accumulation on the walls of the IOM sampler. Therefore, methods based on their use can only be considered semi-quantitative. Second, a protocol combining direct PXRF measurements on workplace surfaces with surface wipes is designed for immediate on-site quantification of removable surface lead residues. The quantification of such residues by this method is compared with subsequent off-site wet chemistry analysis of the surface wipes. The two methods show a good correlation (R(2) ∼ 0.88). The ratio of the amount of removable residues determined by PXRF and wipe sampling is close to one with range 0.26–3.94. It is demonstrated that PXRF can be used as an effective tool for the immediate screening of occupational lead exposure. Although this article focused on lead, PXRF can identify simultaneously a number of other metals. Taylor & Francis 2016-02-01 2015-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4706026/ /pubmed/26713915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2015.1091959 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published with license Crown Copyright http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gorce, Jean-Philippe
Roff, Martin
Immediate screening of lead exposure in the workplace using portable X-ray fluorescence
title Immediate screening of lead exposure in the workplace using portable X-ray fluorescence
title_full Immediate screening of lead exposure in the workplace using portable X-ray fluorescence
title_fullStr Immediate screening of lead exposure in the workplace using portable X-ray fluorescence
title_full_unstemmed Immediate screening of lead exposure in the workplace using portable X-ray fluorescence
title_short Immediate screening of lead exposure in the workplace using portable X-ray fluorescence
title_sort immediate screening of lead exposure in the workplace using portable x-ray fluorescence
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26713915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2015.1091959
work_keys_str_mv AT gorcejeanphilippe immediatescreeningofleadexposureintheworkplaceusingportablexrayfluorescence
AT roffmartin immediatescreeningofleadexposureintheworkplaceusingportablexrayfluorescence