Cargando…

The dorsal posterior insula is not an island in pain but subserves a fundamental role - Response to: “Evidence against pain specificity in the dorsal posterior insula” by Davis et al.

An interesting and valuable discussion has arisen from our recent article (Segerdahl, Mezue et al., 2015) and we are pleased here to have the opportunity to expand on the various points we made. Equally important, we wish to correct several important misunderstandings that were made by Davis and col...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Segerdahl, Andrew R., Mezue, Melvin, Okell, Thomas W., Farrar, John T., Tracey, Irene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000Research 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834997
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7287.1
_version_ 1782409114011303936
author Segerdahl, Andrew R.
Mezue, Melvin
Okell, Thomas W.
Farrar, John T.
Tracey, Irene
author_facet Segerdahl, Andrew R.
Mezue, Melvin
Okell, Thomas W.
Farrar, John T.
Tracey, Irene
author_sort Segerdahl, Andrew R.
collection PubMed
description An interesting and valuable discussion has arisen from our recent article (Segerdahl, Mezue et al., 2015) and we are pleased here to have the opportunity to expand on the various points we made. Equally important, we wish to correct several important misunderstandings that were made by Davis and colleagues that possibly contributed to their concerns about power when assessing our paper (e.g. actual subject numbers used in control experiment and the reality of the signal-to-noise and sampling of the multi-TI technique we employed). Here, we clarify the methods and analysis plus discuss how we interpret the data in the Brief Communication noting that the extrapolation and inferences made by Davis and colleagues are not consistent with our report or necessarily, in our opinion, what the data supports. We trust this reassures the F1000Research readership regarding the robustness of our results and what we actually concluded in the paper regarding their possible meaning. We are pleased, though, that Davis and colleagues have used our article to raise an important discussion around pain perception, and here offer some further insights towards that broader discussion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4706052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher F1000Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47060522016-01-29 The dorsal posterior insula is not an island in pain but subserves a fundamental role - Response to: “Evidence against pain specificity in the dorsal posterior insula” by Davis et al. Segerdahl, Andrew R. Mezue, Melvin Okell, Thomas W. Farrar, John T. Tracey, Irene F1000Res Correspondence An interesting and valuable discussion has arisen from our recent article (Segerdahl, Mezue et al., 2015) and we are pleased here to have the opportunity to expand on the various points we made. Equally important, we wish to correct several important misunderstandings that were made by Davis and colleagues that possibly contributed to their concerns about power when assessing our paper (e.g. actual subject numbers used in control experiment and the reality of the signal-to-noise and sampling of the multi-TI technique we employed). Here, we clarify the methods and analysis plus discuss how we interpret the data in the Brief Communication noting that the extrapolation and inferences made by Davis and colleagues are not consistent with our report or necessarily, in our opinion, what the data supports. We trust this reassures the F1000Research readership regarding the robustness of our results and what we actually concluded in the paper regarding their possible meaning. We are pleased, though, that Davis and colleagues have used our article to raise an important discussion around pain perception, and here offer some further insights towards that broader discussion. F1000Research 2015-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4706052/ /pubmed/26834997 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7287.1 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Segerdahl AR et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Segerdahl, Andrew R.
Mezue, Melvin
Okell, Thomas W.
Farrar, John T.
Tracey, Irene
The dorsal posterior insula is not an island in pain but subserves a fundamental role - Response to: “Evidence against pain specificity in the dorsal posterior insula” by Davis et al.
title The dorsal posterior insula is not an island in pain but subserves a fundamental role - Response to: “Evidence against pain specificity in the dorsal posterior insula” by Davis et al.
title_full The dorsal posterior insula is not an island in pain but subserves a fundamental role - Response to: “Evidence against pain specificity in the dorsal posterior insula” by Davis et al.
title_fullStr The dorsal posterior insula is not an island in pain but subserves a fundamental role - Response to: “Evidence against pain specificity in the dorsal posterior insula” by Davis et al.
title_full_unstemmed The dorsal posterior insula is not an island in pain but subserves a fundamental role - Response to: “Evidence against pain specificity in the dorsal posterior insula” by Davis et al.
title_short The dorsal posterior insula is not an island in pain but subserves a fundamental role - Response to: “Evidence against pain specificity in the dorsal posterior insula” by Davis et al.
title_sort dorsal posterior insula is not an island in pain but subserves a fundamental role - response to: “evidence against pain specificity in the dorsal posterior insula” by davis et al.
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834997
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7287.1
work_keys_str_mv AT segerdahlandrewr thedorsalposteriorinsulaisnotanislandinpainbutsubservesafundamentalroleresponsetoevidenceagainstpainspecificityinthedorsalposteriorinsulabydavisetal
AT mezuemelvin thedorsalposteriorinsulaisnotanislandinpainbutsubservesafundamentalroleresponsetoevidenceagainstpainspecificityinthedorsalposteriorinsulabydavisetal
AT okellthomasw thedorsalposteriorinsulaisnotanislandinpainbutsubservesafundamentalroleresponsetoevidenceagainstpainspecificityinthedorsalposteriorinsulabydavisetal
AT farrarjohnt thedorsalposteriorinsulaisnotanislandinpainbutsubservesafundamentalroleresponsetoevidenceagainstpainspecificityinthedorsalposteriorinsulabydavisetal
AT traceyirene thedorsalposteriorinsulaisnotanislandinpainbutsubservesafundamentalroleresponsetoevidenceagainstpainspecificityinthedorsalposteriorinsulabydavisetal
AT segerdahlandrewr dorsalposteriorinsulaisnotanislandinpainbutsubservesafundamentalroleresponsetoevidenceagainstpainspecificityinthedorsalposteriorinsulabydavisetal
AT mezuemelvin dorsalposteriorinsulaisnotanislandinpainbutsubservesafundamentalroleresponsetoevidenceagainstpainspecificityinthedorsalposteriorinsulabydavisetal
AT okellthomasw dorsalposteriorinsulaisnotanislandinpainbutsubservesafundamentalroleresponsetoevidenceagainstpainspecificityinthedorsalposteriorinsulabydavisetal
AT farrarjohnt dorsalposteriorinsulaisnotanislandinpainbutsubservesafundamentalroleresponsetoevidenceagainstpainspecificityinthedorsalposteriorinsulabydavisetal
AT traceyirene dorsalposteriorinsulaisnotanislandinpainbutsubservesafundamentalroleresponsetoevidenceagainstpainspecificityinthedorsalposteriorinsulabydavisetal