Cargando…
Grey Matter Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Interpretation Depends on Choice of Analysis Method
BACKGROUND: Studies disagree on the location of grey matter (GM) atrophy in the multiple sclerosis (MS) brain. AIM: To examine the consistency between FSL, FreeSurfer, SPM for GM atrophy measurement (for volumes, patient/control discrimination, and correlations with cognition). MATERIALS AND METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26745873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143942 |
_version_ | 1782409147881357312 |
---|---|
author | Popescu, Veronica Schoonheim, Menno M. Versteeg, Adriaan Chaturvedi, Nimisha Jonker, Marianne Xavier de Menezes, Renee Gallindo Garre, Francisca Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J. Barkhof, Frederik Vrenken, Hugo |
author_facet | Popescu, Veronica Schoonheim, Menno M. Versteeg, Adriaan Chaturvedi, Nimisha Jonker, Marianne Xavier de Menezes, Renee Gallindo Garre, Francisca Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J. Barkhof, Frederik Vrenken, Hugo |
author_sort | Popescu, Veronica |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Studies disagree on the location of grey matter (GM) atrophy in the multiple sclerosis (MS) brain. AIM: To examine the consistency between FSL, FreeSurfer, SPM for GM atrophy measurement (for volumes, patient/control discrimination, and correlations with cognition). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 127 MS patients and 50 controls were included and cortical and deep grey matter (DGM) volumetrics were performed. Consistency of volumes was assessed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient/ICC. Consistency of patients/controls discrimination was assessed with Cohen’s d, t-tests, MANOVA and a penalized double-loop logistic classifier. Consistency of association with cognition was assessed with Pearson correlation coefficient and ANOVA. Voxel-based morphometry (SPM-VBM and FSL-VBM) and vertex-wise FreeSurfer were used for group-level comparisons. RESULTS: The highest volumetry ICC were between SPM and FreeSurfer for cortical regions, and the lowest between SPM and FreeSurfer for DGM. The caudate nucleus and temporal lobes had high consistency between all software, while amygdala had lowest volumetric consistency. Consistency of patients/controls discrimination was largest in the DGM for all software, especially for thalamus and pallidum. The penalized double-loop logistic classifier most often selected the thalamus, pallidum and amygdala for all software. FSL yielded the largest number of significant correlations. DGM yielded stronger correlations with cognition than cortical volumes. Bilateral putamen and left insula volumes correlated with cognition using all methods. CONCLUSION: GM volumes from FreeSurfer, FSL and SPM are different, especially for cortical regions. While group-level separation between MS and controls is comparable, correlations between regional GM volumes and clinical/cognitive variables in MS should be cautiously interpreted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4706325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47063252016-01-15 Grey Matter Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Interpretation Depends on Choice of Analysis Method Popescu, Veronica Schoonheim, Menno M. Versteeg, Adriaan Chaturvedi, Nimisha Jonker, Marianne Xavier de Menezes, Renee Gallindo Garre, Francisca Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J. Barkhof, Frederik Vrenken, Hugo PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Studies disagree on the location of grey matter (GM) atrophy in the multiple sclerosis (MS) brain. AIM: To examine the consistency between FSL, FreeSurfer, SPM for GM atrophy measurement (for volumes, patient/control discrimination, and correlations with cognition). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 127 MS patients and 50 controls were included and cortical and deep grey matter (DGM) volumetrics were performed. Consistency of volumes was assessed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient/ICC. Consistency of patients/controls discrimination was assessed with Cohen’s d, t-tests, MANOVA and a penalized double-loop logistic classifier. Consistency of association with cognition was assessed with Pearson correlation coefficient and ANOVA. Voxel-based morphometry (SPM-VBM and FSL-VBM) and vertex-wise FreeSurfer were used for group-level comparisons. RESULTS: The highest volumetry ICC were between SPM and FreeSurfer for cortical regions, and the lowest between SPM and FreeSurfer for DGM. The caudate nucleus and temporal lobes had high consistency between all software, while amygdala had lowest volumetric consistency. Consistency of patients/controls discrimination was largest in the DGM for all software, especially for thalamus and pallidum. The penalized double-loop logistic classifier most often selected the thalamus, pallidum and amygdala for all software. FSL yielded the largest number of significant correlations. DGM yielded stronger correlations with cognition than cortical volumes. Bilateral putamen and left insula volumes correlated with cognition using all methods. CONCLUSION: GM volumes from FreeSurfer, FSL and SPM are different, especially for cortical regions. While group-level separation between MS and controls is comparable, correlations between regional GM volumes and clinical/cognitive variables in MS should be cautiously interpreted. Public Library of Science 2016-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4706325/ /pubmed/26745873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143942 Text en © 2016 Popescu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Popescu, Veronica Schoonheim, Menno M. Versteeg, Adriaan Chaturvedi, Nimisha Jonker, Marianne Xavier de Menezes, Renee Gallindo Garre, Francisca Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J. Barkhof, Frederik Vrenken, Hugo Grey Matter Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Interpretation Depends on Choice of Analysis Method |
title | Grey Matter Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Interpretation Depends on Choice of Analysis Method |
title_full | Grey Matter Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Interpretation Depends on Choice of Analysis Method |
title_fullStr | Grey Matter Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Interpretation Depends on Choice of Analysis Method |
title_full_unstemmed | Grey Matter Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Interpretation Depends on Choice of Analysis Method |
title_short | Grey Matter Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Interpretation Depends on Choice of Analysis Method |
title_sort | grey matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis: clinical interpretation depends on choice of analysis method |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26745873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143942 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT popescuveronica greymatteratrophyinmultiplesclerosisclinicalinterpretationdependsonchoiceofanalysismethod AT schoonheimmennom greymatteratrophyinmultiplesclerosisclinicalinterpretationdependsonchoiceofanalysismethod AT versteegadriaan greymatteratrophyinmultiplesclerosisclinicalinterpretationdependsonchoiceofanalysismethod AT chaturvedinimisha greymatteratrophyinmultiplesclerosisclinicalinterpretationdependsonchoiceofanalysismethod AT jonkermarianne greymatteratrophyinmultiplesclerosisclinicalinterpretationdependsonchoiceofanalysismethod AT xavierdemenezesrenee greymatteratrophyinmultiplesclerosisclinicalinterpretationdependsonchoiceofanalysismethod AT gallindogarrefrancisca greymatteratrophyinmultiplesclerosisclinicalinterpretationdependsonchoiceofanalysismethod AT uitdehaagbernardmj greymatteratrophyinmultiplesclerosisclinicalinterpretationdependsonchoiceofanalysismethod AT barkhoffrederik greymatteratrophyinmultiplesclerosisclinicalinterpretationdependsonchoiceofanalysismethod AT vrenkenhugo greymatteratrophyinmultiplesclerosisclinicalinterpretationdependsonchoiceofanalysismethod |