Cargando…

Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches

Synchronization or phase-locking between oscillating neuronal groups is considered to be important for coordination of information among cortical networks. Spectral coherence is a commonly used approach to quantify phase locking between neural signals. We systematically explored the validity of spec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lowet, Eric, Roberts, Mark J., Bonizzi, Pietro, Karel, Joël, De Weerd, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26745498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146443
_version_ 1782409154385674240
author Lowet, Eric
Roberts, Mark J.
Bonizzi, Pietro
Karel, Joël
De Weerd, Peter
author_facet Lowet, Eric
Roberts, Mark J.
Bonizzi, Pietro
Karel, Joël
De Weerd, Peter
author_sort Lowet, Eric
collection PubMed
description Synchronization or phase-locking between oscillating neuronal groups is considered to be important for coordination of information among cortical networks. Spectral coherence is a commonly used approach to quantify phase locking between neural signals. We systematically explored the validity of spectral coherence measures for quantifying synchronization among neural oscillators. To that aim, we simulated coupled oscillatory signals that exhibited synchronization dynamics using an abstract phase-oscillator model as well as interacting gamma-generating spiking neural networks. We found that, within a large parameter range, the spectral coherence measure deviated substantially from the expected phase-locking. Moreover, spectral coherence did not converge to the expected value with increasing signal-to-noise ratio. We found that spectral coherence particularly failed when oscillators were in the partially (intermittent) synchronized state, which we expect to be the most likely state for neural synchronization. The failure was due to the fast frequency and amplitude changes induced by synchronization forces. We then investigated whether spectral coherence reflected the information flow among networks measured by transfer entropy (TE) of spike trains. We found that spectral coherence failed to robustly reflect changes in synchrony-mediated information flow between neural networks in many instances. As an alternative approach we explored a phase-locking value (PLV) method based on the reconstruction of the instantaneous phase. As one approach for reconstructing instantaneous phase, we used the Hilbert Transform (HT) preceded by Singular Spectrum Decomposition (SSD) of the signal. PLV estimates have broad applicability as they do not rely on stationarity, and, unlike spectral coherence, they enable more accurate estimations of oscillatory synchronization across a wide range of different synchronization regimes, and better tracking of synchronization-mediated information flow among networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4706353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47063532016-01-15 Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches Lowet, Eric Roberts, Mark J. Bonizzi, Pietro Karel, Joël De Weerd, Peter PLoS One Research Article Synchronization or phase-locking between oscillating neuronal groups is considered to be important for coordination of information among cortical networks. Spectral coherence is a commonly used approach to quantify phase locking between neural signals. We systematically explored the validity of spectral coherence measures for quantifying synchronization among neural oscillators. To that aim, we simulated coupled oscillatory signals that exhibited synchronization dynamics using an abstract phase-oscillator model as well as interacting gamma-generating spiking neural networks. We found that, within a large parameter range, the spectral coherence measure deviated substantially from the expected phase-locking. Moreover, spectral coherence did not converge to the expected value with increasing signal-to-noise ratio. We found that spectral coherence particularly failed when oscillators were in the partially (intermittent) synchronized state, which we expect to be the most likely state for neural synchronization. The failure was due to the fast frequency and amplitude changes induced by synchronization forces. We then investigated whether spectral coherence reflected the information flow among networks measured by transfer entropy (TE) of spike trains. We found that spectral coherence failed to robustly reflect changes in synchrony-mediated information flow between neural networks in many instances. As an alternative approach we explored a phase-locking value (PLV) method based on the reconstruction of the instantaneous phase. As one approach for reconstructing instantaneous phase, we used the Hilbert Transform (HT) preceded by Singular Spectrum Decomposition (SSD) of the signal. PLV estimates have broad applicability as they do not rely on stationarity, and, unlike spectral coherence, they enable more accurate estimations of oscillatory synchronization across a wide range of different synchronization regimes, and better tracking of synchronization-mediated information flow among networks. Public Library of Science 2016-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4706353/ /pubmed/26745498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146443 Text en © 2016 Lowet et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lowet, Eric
Roberts, Mark J.
Bonizzi, Pietro
Karel, Joël
De Weerd, Peter
Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches
title Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches
title_full Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches
title_fullStr Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches
title_short Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches
title_sort quantifying neural oscillatory synchronization: a comparison between spectral coherence and phase-locking value approaches
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26745498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146443
work_keys_str_mv AT loweteric quantifyingneuraloscillatorysynchronizationacomparisonbetweenspectralcoherenceandphaselockingvalueapproaches
AT robertsmarkj quantifyingneuraloscillatorysynchronizationacomparisonbetweenspectralcoherenceandphaselockingvalueapproaches
AT bonizzipietro quantifyingneuraloscillatorysynchronizationacomparisonbetweenspectralcoherenceandphaselockingvalueapproaches
AT kareljoel quantifyingneuraloscillatorysynchronizationacomparisonbetweenspectralcoherenceandphaselockingvalueapproaches
AT deweerdpeter quantifyingneuraloscillatorysynchronizationacomparisonbetweenspectralcoherenceandphaselockingvalueapproaches