Cargando…

Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images

The correction of intensity non-uniformity (INU) in magnetic resonance (MR) images is extremely important to ensure both within-subject and across-subject reliability. Here we tackled the problem of objectively comparing INU correction techniques for T1-weighted images, which are the most commonly u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ganzetti, Marco, Wenderoth, Nicole, Mantini, Dante
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26306865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-015-9277-2
_version_ 1782409217133510656
author Ganzetti, Marco
Wenderoth, Nicole
Mantini, Dante
author_facet Ganzetti, Marco
Wenderoth, Nicole
Mantini, Dante
author_sort Ganzetti, Marco
collection PubMed
description The correction of intensity non-uniformity (INU) in magnetic resonance (MR) images is extremely important to ensure both within-subject and across-subject reliability. Here we tackled the problem of objectively comparing INU correction techniques for T1-weighted images, which are the most commonly used in structural brain imaging. We focused our investigations on the methods integrated in widely used software packages for MR data analysis: FreeSurfer, BrainVoyager, SPM and FSL. We used simulated data to assess the INU fields reconstructed by those methods for controlled inhomogeneity magnitudes and noise levels. For each method, we evaluated a wide range of input parameters and defined an enhanced configuration associated with best reconstruction performance. By comparing enhanced and default configurations, we found that the former often provide much more accurate results. Accordingly, we used enhanced configurations for a more objective comparison between methods. For different levels of INU magnitude and noise, SPM and FSL, which integrate INU correction with brain segmentation, generally outperformed FreeSurfer and BrainVoyager, whose methods are exclusively dedicated to INU correction. Nonetheless, accurate INU field reconstructions can be obtained with FreeSurfer on images with low noise and with BrainVoyager for slow and smooth inhomogeneity profiles. Our study may prove helpful for an accurate selection of the INU correction method to be used based on the characteristics of actual MR data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12021-015-9277-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4706843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47068432016-01-18 Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images Ganzetti, Marco Wenderoth, Nicole Mantini, Dante Neuroinformatics Original Article The correction of intensity non-uniformity (INU) in magnetic resonance (MR) images is extremely important to ensure both within-subject and across-subject reliability. Here we tackled the problem of objectively comparing INU correction techniques for T1-weighted images, which are the most commonly used in structural brain imaging. We focused our investigations on the methods integrated in widely used software packages for MR data analysis: FreeSurfer, BrainVoyager, SPM and FSL. We used simulated data to assess the INU fields reconstructed by those methods for controlled inhomogeneity magnitudes and noise levels. For each method, we evaluated a wide range of input parameters and defined an enhanced configuration associated with best reconstruction performance. By comparing enhanced and default configurations, we found that the former often provide much more accurate results. Accordingly, we used enhanced configurations for a more objective comparison between methods. For different levels of INU magnitude and noise, SPM and FSL, which integrate INU correction with brain segmentation, generally outperformed FreeSurfer and BrainVoyager, whose methods are exclusively dedicated to INU correction. Nonetheless, accurate INU field reconstructions can be obtained with FreeSurfer on images with low noise and with BrainVoyager for slow and smooth inhomogeneity profiles. Our study may prove helpful for an accurate selection of the INU correction method to be used based on the characteristics of actual MR data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12021-015-9277-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2015-08-26 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4706843/ /pubmed/26306865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-015-9277-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ganzetti, Marco
Wenderoth, Nicole
Mantini, Dante
Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images
title Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images
title_full Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images
title_fullStr Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images
title_short Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images
title_sort quantitative evaluation of intensity inhomogeneity correction methods for structural mr brain images
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26306865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-015-9277-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ganzettimarco quantitativeevaluationofintensityinhomogeneitycorrectionmethodsforstructuralmrbrainimages
AT wenderothnicole quantitativeevaluationofintensityinhomogeneitycorrectionmethodsforstructuralmrbrainimages
AT mantinidante quantitativeevaluationofintensityinhomogeneitycorrectionmethodsforstructuralmrbrainimages