Cargando…

Temporal Trends and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Use in Lusaka, Zambia, 2004–2011

Introduction. Although increasing access to family planning has been an important part of the global development agenda, millions of women continue to face unmet need for contraception. Materials and Methods. We analyzed data from a repeated cross-sectional community survey conducted in Lusaka, Zamb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hancock, Nancy L., Chibwesha, Carla J., Stoner, Marie C. D., Vwalika, Bellington, Rathod, Sujit D., Kasaro, Margaret Phiri, Stringer, Elizabeth M., Stringer, Jeffrey S. A., Chi, Benjamin H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26819951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/521928
_version_ 1782409219646947328
author Hancock, Nancy L.
Chibwesha, Carla J.
Stoner, Marie C. D.
Vwalika, Bellington
Rathod, Sujit D.
Kasaro, Margaret Phiri
Stringer, Elizabeth M.
Stringer, Jeffrey S. A.
Chi, Benjamin H.
author_facet Hancock, Nancy L.
Chibwesha, Carla J.
Stoner, Marie C. D.
Vwalika, Bellington
Rathod, Sujit D.
Kasaro, Margaret Phiri
Stringer, Elizabeth M.
Stringer, Jeffrey S. A.
Chi, Benjamin H.
author_sort Hancock, Nancy L.
collection PubMed
description Introduction. Although increasing access to family planning has been an important part of the global development agenda, millions of women continue to face unmet need for contraception. Materials and Methods. We analyzed data from a repeated cross-sectional community survey conducted in Lusaka, Zambia, over an eight-year period. We described prevalence of modern contraceptive use, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), among female heads of household aged 16–50 years. We also identified predictors of LARC versus short-term contraceptive use among women using modern methods. Results and Discussion. Twelve survey rounds were completed between November 2004 and September 2011. Among 29,476 eligible respondents, 17,605 (60%) reported using modern contraception. Oral contraceptive pills remained the most popular method over time, but use of LARC increased significantly, from less than 1% in 2004 to 9% by 2011 (p < 0.001). Younger women (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.61) and women with lower levels of education (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.89) were less likely to report LARC use compared to women using short-term modern methods. Conclusions. Population-based assessments of contraceptive use over time can guide programs and policies. To achieve reproductive health equity and reduce unmet contraceptive need, future efforts to increase LARC use should focus on young women and those with less education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4706854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47068542016-01-27 Temporal Trends and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Use in Lusaka, Zambia, 2004–2011 Hancock, Nancy L. Chibwesha, Carla J. Stoner, Marie C. D. Vwalika, Bellington Rathod, Sujit D. Kasaro, Margaret Phiri Stringer, Elizabeth M. Stringer, Jeffrey S. A. Chi, Benjamin H. Biomed Res Int Research Article Introduction. Although increasing access to family planning has been an important part of the global development agenda, millions of women continue to face unmet need for contraception. Materials and Methods. We analyzed data from a repeated cross-sectional community survey conducted in Lusaka, Zambia, over an eight-year period. We described prevalence of modern contraceptive use, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), among female heads of household aged 16–50 years. We also identified predictors of LARC versus short-term contraceptive use among women using modern methods. Results and Discussion. Twelve survey rounds were completed between November 2004 and September 2011. Among 29,476 eligible respondents, 17,605 (60%) reported using modern contraception. Oral contraceptive pills remained the most popular method over time, but use of LARC increased significantly, from less than 1% in 2004 to 9% by 2011 (p < 0.001). Younger women (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.61) and women with lower levels of education (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.89) were less likely to report LARC use compared to women using short-term modern methods. Conclusions. Population-based assessments of contraceptive use over time can guide programs and policies. To achieve reproductive health equity and reduce unmet contraceptive need, future efforts to increase LARC use should focus on young women and those with less education. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4706854/ /pubmed/26819951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/521928 Text en Copyright © 2015 Nancy L. Hancock et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hancock, Nancy L.
Chibwesha, Carla J.
Stoner, Marie C. D.
Vwalika, Bellington
Rathod, Sujit D.
Kasaro, Margaret Phiri
Stringer, Elizabeth M.
Stringer, Jeffrey S. A.
Chi, Benjamin H.
Temporal Trends and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Use in Lusaka, Zambia, 2004–2011
title Temporal Trends and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Use in Lusaka, Zambia, 2004–2011
title_full Temporal Trends and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Use in Lusaka, Zambia, 2004–2011
title_fullStr Temporal Trends and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Use in Lusaka, Zambia, 2004–2011
title_full_unstemmed Temporal Trends and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Use in Lusaka, Zambia, 2004–2011
title_short Temporal Trends and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Use in Lusaka, Zambia, 2004–2011
title_sort temporal trends and predictors of modern contraceptive use in lusaka, zambia, 2004–2011
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26819951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/521928
work_keys_str_mv AT hancocknancyl temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
AT chibweshacarlaj temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
AT stonermariecd temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
AT vwalikabellington temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
AT rathodsujitd temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
AT kasaromargaretphiri temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
AT stringerelizabethm temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
AT stringerjeffreysa temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
AT chibenjaminh temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011