Cargando…
Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT: maximum standard uptake value as a trigger in a semi-automated screening setting
BACKGROUND: Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT may be associated with a malignancy and can be quantified. This provides the basis for an automatic trigger threshold above which cases are flagged for colonoscopic evaluation and below which for individual assessment. PURPOSE: To determine the l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26749430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-016-0195-z |
_version_ | 1782409249657192448 |
---|---|
author | Luboldt, Wolfgang Wiedemann, Baerbel Fischer, Sebastian Bodelle, Boris Luboldt, Hans Joachim Grünwald, Frank Vogl, Thomas J. |
author_facet | Luboldt, Wolfgang Wiedemann, Baerbel Fischer, Sebastian Bodelle, Boris Luboldt, Hans Joachim Grünwald, Frank Vogl, Thomas J. |
author_sort | Luboldt, Wolfgang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT may be associated with a malignancy and can be quantified. This provides the basis for an automatic trigger threshold above which cases are flagged for colonoscopic evaluation and below which for individual assessment. PURPOSE: To determine the lowest maximum standard uptake (SUV(max)) in colorectal cancer that could be used as a threshold to trigger endoscopic evaluation and to evaluate whether the SUV(max) needs to be further normalised to a priori known extrinsic factors. METHODS: The SUV(max) was measured in 54 colorectal carcinomas and correlated with gender, age, blood glucose level, injected activity, body mass index and time to scan using t test or correlation coefficients (Pearson or Spearman, according to distribution). RESULTS: There was no correlation between SUV(max) and any of the extrinsic factors mentioned above. The lowest SUV(max) value was 5 [mean ± SD (range): 11.1 ± 4.8 (5.0–24.6)]. CONCLUSION: In contrast to most other screening techniques, semi-automation in colorectal screening seems possible with PET/CT. This opens the door for further study into the feasibility of automated screening. Independent from extrinsic factors, an SUV(max) ≥5.0 in a focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT should automatically trigger for endoscopic evaluation, if not contraindicated. Cases with SUV(max) <5 should be assessed individually before referral for endoscopy. Thus, more interpretation time could be spent on those cases with a lower uptake and more ambiguous diagnosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40001-016-0195-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4706998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47069982016-01-11 Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT: maximum standard uptake value as a trigger in a semi-automated screening setting Luboldt, Wolfgang Wiedemann, Baerbel Fischer, Sebastian Bodelle, Boris Luboldt, Hans Joachim Grünwald, Frank Vogl, Thomas J. Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT may be associated with a malignancy and can be quantified. This provides the basis for an automatic trigger threshold above which cases are flagged for colonoscopic evaluation and below which for individual assessment. PURPOSE: To determine the lowest maximum standard uptake (SUV(max)) in colorectal cancer that could be used as a threshold to trigger endoscopic evaluation and to evaluate whether the SUV(max) needs to be further normalised to a priori known extrinsic factors. METHODS: The SUV(max) was measured in 54 colorectal carcinomas and correlated with gender, age, blood glucose level, injected activity, body mass index and time to scan using t test or correlation coefficients (Pearson or Spearman, according to distribution). RESULTS: There was no correlation between SUV(max) and any of the extrinsic factors mentioned above. The lowest SUV(max) value was 5 [mean ± SD (range): 11.1 ± 4.8 (5.0–24.6)]. CONCLUSION: In contrast to most other screening techniques, semi-automation in colorectal screening seems possible with PET/CT. This opens the door for further study into the feasibility of automated screening. Independent from extrinsic factors, an SUV(max) ≥5.0 in a focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT should automatically trigger for endoscopic evaluation, if not contraindicated. Cases with SUV(max) <5 should be assessed individually before referral for endoscopy. Thus, more interpretation time could be spent on those cases with a lower uptake and more ambiguous diagnosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40001-016-0195-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4706998/ /pubmed/26749430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-016-0195-z Text en © Luboldt et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Luboldt, Wolfgang Wiedemann, Baerbel Fischer, Sebastian Bodelle, Boris Luboldt, Hans Joachim Grünwald, Frank Vogl, Thomas J. Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT: maximum standard uptake value as a trigger in a semi-automated screening setting |
title | Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT: maximum standard uptake value as a trigger in a semi-automated screening setting |
title_full | Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT: maximum standard uptake value as a trigger in a semi-automated screening setting |
title_fullStr | Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT: maximum standard uptake value as a trigger in a semi-automated screening setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT: maximum standard uptake value as a trigger in a semi-automated screening setting |
title_short | Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT: maximum standard uptake value as a trigger in a semi-automated screening setting |
title_sort | focal colorectal uptake in (18)fdg-pet/ct: maximum standard uptake value as a trigger in a semi-automated screening setting |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26749430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-016-0195-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luboldtwolfgang focalcolorectaluptakein18fdgpetctmaximumstandarduptakevalueasatriggerinasemiautomatedscreeningsetting AT wiedemannbaerbel focalcolorectaluptakein18fdgpetctmaximumstandarduptakevalueasatriggerinasemiautomatedscreeningsetting AT fischersebastian focalcolorectaluptakein18fdgpetctmaximumstandarduptakevalueasatriggerinasemiautomatedscreeningsetting AT bodelleboris focalcolorectaluptakein18fdgpetctmaximumstandarduptakevalueasatriggerinasemiautomatedscreeningsetting AT luboldthansjoachim focalcolorectaluptakein18fdgpetctmaximumstandarduptakevalueasatriggerinasemiautomatedscreeningsetting AT grunwaldfrank focalcolorectaluptakein18fdgpetctmaximumstandarduptakevalueasatriggerinasemiautomatedscreeningsetting AT voglthomasj focalcolorectaluptakein18fdgpetctmaximumstandarduptakevalueasatriggerinasemiautomatedscreeningsetting |