Cargando…

Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate Parker Flex-It stylet as an alternative to GlideRite Rigid stylet to aid tracheal intubation with the Glidescope. METHODS: This prospective randomized trial was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheta, Saad A., Abdelhalim, Ashraf A., ElZoughari, Ismail A., AlZahrani, Tariq A., Al-Saeed, Abdulhamid H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Saudi Medical Journal 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4707401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26620987
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.12.12432
_version_ 1782409307298463744
author Sheta, Saad A.
Abdelhalim, Ashraf A.
ElZoughari, Ismail A.
AlZahrani, Tariq A.
Al-Saeed, Abdulhamid H.
author_facet Sheta, Saad A.
Abdelhalim, Ashraf A.
ElZoughari, Ismail A.
AlZahrani, Tariq A.
Al-Saeed, Abdulhamid H.
author_sort Sheta, Saad A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate Parker Flex-It stylet as an alternative to GlideRite Rigid stylet to aid tracheal intubation with the Glidescope. METHODS: This prospective randomized trial was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between May and December 2014. Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II patients were randomly assigned to one of 2 equal groups receiving intubation by Glidescope using either GlideRite Rigid stylet (Group GS) or Parker Flex-It stylet (Group PS). The total intubation time, ease of intubation, incidences of successful intubation at first attempt, number of intubation attempts, use of optimization maneuvers, and possible complications were recorded. RESULTS: No significant differences between both groups regarding the total intubation time (p=0.08) was observed. Intubation was significantly easier in group PS compared with group GS as measured by visual analogue scale (p=0.001) with no significant differences between the groups regarding the rate of successful tracheal intubation from first attempt (p=0.524). However, the number of attempts at intubation and usage of external laryngeal manipulation were similar in both groups (p>0.05). The incidence of sore throat, dysphagia, hoarseness, and trauma were significantly higher in group GS (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet when used by experienced operators in patients with normal airways using Glidescope; however, it is easier and less traumatic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4707401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Saudi Medical Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47074012016-01-21 Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope Sheta, Saad A. Abdelhalim, Ashraf A. ElZoughari, Ismail A. AlZahrani, Tariq A. Al-Saeed, Abdulhamid H. Saudi Med J Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate Parker Flex-It stylet as an alternative to GlideRite Rigid stylet to aid tracheal intubation with the Glidescope. METHODS: This prospective randomized trial was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between May and December 2014. Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II patients were randomly assigned to one of 2 equal groups receiving intubation by Glidescope using either GlideRite Rigid stylet (Group GS) or Parker Flex-It stylet (Group PS). The total intubation time, ease of intubation, incidences of successful intubation at first attempt, number of intubation attempts, use of optimization maneuvers, and possible complications were recorded. RESULTS: No significant differences between both groups regarding the total intubation time (p=0.08) was observed. Intubation was significantly easier in group PS compared with group GS as measured by visual analogue scale (p=0.001) with no significant differences between the groups regarding the rate of successful tracheal intubation from first attempt (p=0.524). However, the number of attempts at intubation and usage of external laryngeal manipulation were similar in both groups (p>0.05). The incidence of sore throat, dysphagia, hoarseness, and trauma were significantly higher in group GS (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet when used by experienced operators in patients with normal airways using Glidescope; however, it is easier and less traumatic. Saudi Medical Journal 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4707401/ /pubmed/26620987 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.12.12432 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sheta, Saad A.
Abdelhalim, Ashraf A.
ElZoughari, Ismail A.
AlZahrani, Tariq A.
Al-Saeed, Abdulhamid H.
Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope
title Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope
title_full Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope
title_fullStr Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope
title_full_unstemmed Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope
title_short Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope
title_sort parker flex-it stylet is as effective as gliderite rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by glidescope
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4707401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26620987
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.12.12432
work_keys_str_mv AT shetasaada parkerflexitstyletisaseffectiveasglideriterigidstyletfororotrachealintubationbyglidescope
AT abdelhalimashrafa parkerflexitstyletisaseffectiveasglideriterigidstyletfororotrachealintubationbyglidescope
AT elzoughariismaila parkerflexitstyletisaseffectiveasglideriterigidstyletfororotrachealintubationbyglidescope
AT alzahranitariqa parkerflexitstyletisaseffectiveasglideriterigidstyletfororotrachealintubationbyglidescope
AT alsaeedabdulhamidh parkerflexitstyletisaseffectiveasglideriterigidstyletfororotrachealintubationbyglidescope