Cargando…
Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate Parker Flex-It stylet as an alternative to GlideRite Rigid stylet to aid tracheal intubation with the Glidescope. METHODS: This prospective randomized trial was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia be...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Saudi Medical Journal
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4707401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26620987 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.12.12432 |
_version_ | 1782409307298463744 |
---|---|
author | Sheta, Saad A. Abdelhalim, Ashraf A. ElZoughari, Ismail A. AlZahrani, Tariq A. Al-Saeed, Abdulhamid H. |
author_facet | Sheta, Saad A. Abdelhalim, Ashraf A. ElZoughari, Ismail A. AlZahrani, Tariq A. Al-Saeed, Abdulhamid H. |
author_sort | Sheta, Saad A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate Parker Flex-It stylet as an alternative to GlideRite Rigid stylet to aid tracheal intubation with the Glidescope. METHODS: This prospective randomized trial was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between May and December 2014. Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II patients were randomly assigned to one of 2 equal groups receiving intubation by Glidescope using either GlideRite Rigid stylet (Group GS) or Parker Flex-It stylet (Group PS). The total intubation time, ease of intubation, incidences of successful intubation at first attempt, number of intubation attempts, use of optimization maneuvers, and possible complications were recorded. RESULTS: No significant differences between both groups regarding the total intubation time (p=0.08) was observed. Intubation was significantly easier in group PS compared with group GS as measured by visual analogue scale (p=0.001) with no significant differences between the groups regarding the rate of successful tracheal intubation from first attempt (p=0.524). However, the number of attempts at intubation and usage of external laryngeal manipulation were similar in both groups (p>0.05). The incidence of sore throat, dysphagia, hoarseness, and trauma were significantly higher in group GS (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet when used by experienced operators in patients with normal airways using Glidescope; however, it is easier and less traumatic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4707401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Saudi Medical Journal |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47074012016-01-21 Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope Sheta, Saad A. Abdelhalim, Ashraf A. ElZoughari, Ismail A. AlZahrani, Tariq A. Al-Saeed, Abdulhamid H. Saudi Med J Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate Parker Flex-It stylet as an alternative to GlideRite Rigid stylet to aid tracheal intubation with the Glidescope. METHODS: This prospective randomized trial was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between May and December 2014. Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II patients were randomly assigned to one of 2 equal groups receiving intubation by Glidescope using either GlideRite Rigid stylet (Group GS) or Parker Flex-It stylet (Group PS). The total intubation time, ease of intubation, incidences of successful intubation at first attempt, number of intubation attempts, use of optimization maneuvers, and possible complications were recorded. RESULTS: No significant differences between both groups regarding the total intubation time (p=0.08) was observed. Intubation was significantly easier in group PS compared with group GS as measured by visual analogue scale (p=0.001) with no significant differences between the groups regarding the rate of successful tracheal intubation from first attempt (p=0.524). However, the number of attempts at intubation and usage of external laryngeal manipulation were similar in both groups (p>0.05). The incidence of sore throat, dysphagia, hoarseness, and trauma were significantly higher in group GS (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet when used by experienced operators in patients with normal airways using Glidescope; however, it is easier and less traumatic. Saudi Medical Journal 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4707401/ /pubmed/26620987 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.12.12432 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sheta, Saad A. Abdelhalim, Ashraf A. ElZoughari, Ismail A. AlZahrani, Tariq A. Al-Saeed, Abdulhamid H. Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope |
title | Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope |
title_full | Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope |
title_fullStr | Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope |
title_full_unstemmed | Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope |
title_short | Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope |
title_sort | parker flex-it stylet is as effective as gliderite rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by glidescope |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4707401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26620987 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.12.12432 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shetasaada parkerflexitstyletisaseffectiveasglideriterigidstyletfororotrachealintubationbyglidescope AT abdelhalimashrafa parkerflexitstyletisaseffectiveasglideriterigidstyletfororotrachealintubationbyglidescope AT elzoughariismaila parkerflexitstyletisaseffectiveasglideriterigidstyletfororotrachealintubationbyglidescope AT alzahranitariqa parkerflexitstyletisaseffectiveasglideriterigidstyletfororotrachealintubationbyglidescope AT alsaeedabdulhamidh parkerflexitstyletisaseffectiveasglideriterigidstyletfororotrachealintubationbyglidescope |