Cargando…

Conjunctival impression cytology versus routine tear function tests for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers

AIMS: Prolonged contact lens wear is often accompanied by dryness of the eyes. The aim of this study was to compare conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) and tear film tests such as tear film break up time (TBUT) and Schirmer test for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers and measure their cor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Prachi, Bhargava, Rahul, Arora, Yogesh C., Kaushal, Sidharth, Kumar, Manjushri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4707789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26811575
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.171242
_version_ 1782409371504869376
author Kumar, Prachi
Bhargava, Rahul
Arora, Yogesh C.
Kaushal, Sidharth
Kumar, Manjushri
author_facet Kumar, Prachi
Bhargava, Rahul
Arora, Yogesh C.
Kaushal, Sidharth
Kumar, Manjushri
author_sort Kumar, Prachi
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Prolonged contact lens wear is often accompanied by dryness of the eyes. The aim of this study was to compare conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) and tear film tests such as tear film break up time (TBUT) and Schirmer test for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers and measure their correlation with dry eye symptoms. SETTING: A case control study was done at three referral eye centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The eyes of 230 contact lens users were compared to 250 eyes of age- and sex-matched controls. Participants were recruited based on their response to a questionnaire of dry eye symptoms, (Dry Eye Scoring System, DESS(©)) and measurements of TBUT, Schirmer test, and CIC was done. A correlation analysis between symptom severity and tear film tests was performed. Pearson's coefficient, R(2) > 0.5 was considered significant. RESULTS: As compared to controls (r(2) = 0.010), Nelson grade correlated significantly with dry eye symptoms (r(2) = 0.765), among cases. However, there was moderate correlation between dry eye symptoms, Schirmer test, and TBUT (r(2) = 0.557 and 0.530, respectively) among cases and a weak correlation among controls (r(2) = 0.130 and 0.054, respectively). The sensitivity of TBUT was 86.4%, specificity was 82.4%, positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 4.50 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.46-5.85)], and negative LR was 0.09. The sensitivity of the Schirmer test was 48.2%, specificity 88%, LR 2.12 (95% CI 1.48-2.96), and negative LR 0.83. CONCLUSION: CIC correlates better than Schirmer and TBUT with dry eye symptoms. It may be the most appropriate test for dry-eye evaluation in contact lens wearers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4707789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47077892016-01-25 Conjunctival impression cytology versus routine tear function tests for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers Kumar, Prachi Bhargava, Rahul Arora, Yogesh C. Kaushal, Sidharth Kumar, Manjushri J Cytol Original Article AIMS: Prolonged contact lens wear is often accompanied by dryness of the eyes. The aim of this study was to compare conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) and tear film tests such as tear film break up time (TBUT) and Schirmer test for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers and measure their correlation with dry eye symptoms. SETTING: A case control study was done at three referral eye centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The eyes of 230 contact lens users were compared to 250 eyes of age- and sex-matched controls. Participants were recruited based on their response to a questionnaire of dry eye symptoms, (Dry Eye Scoring System, DESS(©)) and measurements of TBUT, Schirmer test, and CIC was done. A correlation analysis between symptom severity and tear film tests was performed. Pearson's coefficient, R(2) > 0.5 was considered significant. RESULTS: As compared to controls (r(2) = 0.010), Nelson grade correlated significantly with dry eye symptoms (r(2) = 0.765), among cases. However, there was moderate correlation between dry eye symptoms, Schirmer test, and TBUT (r(2) = 0.557 and 0.530, respectively) among cases and a weak correlation among controls (r(2) = 0.130 and 0.054, respectively). The sensitivity of TBUT was 86.4%, specificity was 82.4%, positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 4.50 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.46-5.85)], and negative LR was 0.09. The sensitivity of the Schirmer test was 48.2%, specificity 88%, LR 2.12 (95% CI 1.48-2.96), and negative LR 0.83. CONCLUSION: CIC correlates better than Schirmer and TBUT with dry eye symptoms. It may be the most appropriate test for dry-eye evaluation in contact lens wearers. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4707789/ /pubmed/26811575 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.171242 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Cytology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumar, Prachi
Bhargava, Rahul
Arora, Yogesh C.
Kaushal, Sidharth
Kumar, Manjushri
Conjunctival impression cytology versus routine tear function tests for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers
title Conjunctival impression cytology versus routine tear function tests for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers
title_full Conjunctival impression cytology versus routine tear function tests for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers
title_fullStr Conjunctival impression cytology versus routine tear function tests for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers
title_full_unstemmed Conjunctival impression cytology versus routine tear function tests for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers
title_short Conjunctival impression cytology versus routine tear function tests for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers
title_sort conjunctival impression cytology versus routine tear function tests for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4707789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26811575
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.171242
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarprachi conjunctivalimpressioncytologyversusroutinetearfunctiontestsfordryeyeevaluationincontactlenswearers
AT bhargavarahul conjunctivalimpressioncytologyversusroutinetearfunctiontestsfordryeyeevaluationincontactlenswearers
AT arorayogeshc conjunctivalimpressioncytologyversusroutinetearfunctiontestsfordryeyeevaluationincontactlenswearers
AT kaushalsidharth conjunctivalimpressioncytologyversusroutinetearfunctiontestsfordryeyeevaluationincontactlenswearers
AT kumarmanjushri conjunctivalimpressioncytologyversusroutinetearfunctiontestsfordryeyeevaluationincontactlenswearers