Cargando…

Cardiac Arrests in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Retrospective Analysis of 73,029 Procedures

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Airway difficulties leading to cardiac arrest are frequently encountered during propofol sedation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. With a noticeable increase in the use of propofol for endoscopic sedation, we decided to examine the incidence and outcome of car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goudra, Basavana, Nuzat, Ahmad, Singh, Preet M., Gouda, Gowri B., Carlin, Augustus, Manjunath, Amit K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4707810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26655137
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.164202
_version_ 1782409376275890176
author Goudra, Basavana
Nuzat, Ahmad
Singh, Preet M.
Gouda, Gowri B.
Carlin, Augustus
Manjunath, Amit K.
author_facet Goudra, Basavana
Nuzat, Ahmad
Singh, Preet M.
Gouda, Gowri B.
Carlin, Augustus
Manjunath, Amit K.
author_sort Goudra, Basavana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Airway difficulties leading to cardiac arrest are frequently encountered during propofol sedation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. With a noticeable increase in the use of propofol for endoscopic sedation, we decided to examine the incidence and outcome of cardiac arrests in patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy with sedation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, cardiac arrest data obtained from the clinical quality improvement and local registry over 5 years was analyzed. The information of patients who sustained cardiac arrest attributable to sedation was studied in detail. Analysis included comparison of cardiac arrests due to all causes until discharge (or death) versus the cardiac arrests and death occurring during the procedure and in the recovery area. RESULTS: The incidence of cardiac arrest and death (all causes, until discharge) was 6.07 and 4.28 per 10,000 in patients sedated with propofol, compared with non–propofol-based sedation (0.67 and 0.44). The incidence of cardiac arrest during and immediately after the procedure (recovery area) for all endoscopies was 3.92 per 10,000; of which, 72% were airway management related. About 90.0% of all peri-procedural cardiac arrests occurred in patients who received propofol. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of cardiac arrest and death is about 10 times higher in patients receiving propofol-based sedation compared with those receiving midazolam–fentanyl sedation. More than two thirds of these events occur during EGD and ERCP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4707810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47078102016-01-25 Cardiac Arrests in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Retrospective Analysis of 73,029 Procedures Goudra, Basavana Nuzat, Ahmad Singh, Preet M. Gouda, Gowri B. Carlin, Augustus Manjunath, Amit K. Saudi J Gastroenterol Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Airway difficulties leading to cardiac arrest are frequently encountered during propofol sedation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. With a noticeable increase in the use of propofol for endoscopic sedation, we decided to examine the incidence and outcome of cardiac arrests in patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy with sedation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, cardiac arrest data obtained from the clinical quality improvement and local registry over 5 years was analyzed. The information of patients who sustained cardiac arrest attributable to sedation was studied in detail. Analysis included comparison of cardiac arrests due to all causes until discharge (or death) versus the cardiac arrests and death occurring during the procedure and in the recovery area. RESULTS: The incidence of cardiac arrest and death (all causes, until discharge) was 6.07 and 4.28 per 10,000 in patients sedated with propofol, compared with non–propofol-based sedation (0.67 and 0.44). The incidence of cardiac arrest during and immediately after the procedure (recovery area) for all endoscopies was 3.92 per 10,000; of which, 72% were airway management related. About 90.0% of all peri-procedural cardiac arrests occurred in patients who received propofol. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of cardiac arrest and death is about 10 times higher in patients receiving propofol-based sedation compared with those receiving midazolam–fentanyl sedation. More than two thirds of these events occur during EGD and ERCP. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4707810/ /pubmed/26655137 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.164202 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Goudra, Basavana
Nuzat, Ahmad
Singh, Preet M.
Gouda, Gowri B.
Carlin, Augustus
Manjunath, Amit K.
Cardiac Arrests in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Retrospective Analysis of 73,029 Procedures
title Cardiac Arrests in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Retrospective Analysis of 73,029 Procedures
title_full Cardiac Arrests in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Retrospective Analysis of 73,029 Procedures
title_fullStr Cardiac Arrests in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Retrospective Analysis of 73,029 Procedures
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac Arrests in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Retrospective Analysis of 73,029 Procedures
title_short Cardiac Arrests in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Retrospective Analysis of 73,029 Procedures
title_sort cardiac arrests in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a retrospective analysis of 73,029 procedures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4707810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26655137
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.164202
work_keys_str_mv AT goudrabasavana cardiacarrestsinpatientsundergoinggastrointestinalendoscopyaretrospectiveanalysisof73029procedures
AT nuzatahmad cardiacarrestsinpatientsundergoinggastrointestinalendoscopyaretrospectiveanalysisof73029procedures
AT singhpreetm cardiacarrestsinpatientsundergoinggastrointestinalendoscopyaretrospectiveanalysisof73029procedures
AT goudagowrib cardiacarrestsinpatientsundergoinggastrointestinalendoscopyaretrospectiveanalysisof73029procedures
AT carlinaugustus cardiacarrestsinpatientsundergoinggastrointestinalendoscopyaretrospectiveanalysisof73029procedures
AT manjunathamitk cardiacarrestsinpatientsundergoinggastrointestinalendoscopyaretrospectiveanalysisof73029procedures