Cargando…

Pro: endoscopic realignment for pelvic fracture urethral injuries

Patients with pelvic fracture urethral distraction injuries may benefit from early endoscopic realignment. Realignment is associated with a low risk of immediate complications and has a high success rate for achieving catheter placement. Review of over thirty studies assessing for subsequent urethra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stein, Daniel M., Santucci, Richard A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816813
http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.01.11
_version_ 1782409431942692864
author Stein, Daniel M.
Santucci, Richard A.
author_facet Stein, Daniel M.
Santucci, Richard A.
author_sort Stein, Daniel M.
collection PubMed
description Patients with pelvic fracture urethral distraction injuries may benefit from early endoscopic realignment. Realignment is associated with a low risk of immediate complications and has a high success rate for achieving catheter placement. Review of over thirty studies assessing for subsequent urethral stenosis, including at least a dozen that directly compare realignment to suprapubic diversion along, conclude that there is a benefit averaging at least 35% in favor of realignment. Furthermore, realignment may result in easier subsequent urethroplasty and possibly shorter stenoses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4708271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47082712016-01-26 Pro: endoscopic realignment for pelvic fracture urethral injuries Stein, Daniel M. Santucci, Richard A. Transl Androl Urol Review Article Patients with pelvic fracture urethral distraction injuries may benefit from early endoscopic realignment. Realignment is associated with a low risk of immediate complications and has a high success rate for achieving catheter placement. Review of over thirty studies assessing for subsequent urethral stenosis, including at least a dozen that directly compare realignment to suprapubic diversion along, conclude that there is a benefit averaging at least 35% in favor of realignment. Furthermore, realignment may result in easier subsequent urethroplasty and possibly shorter stenoses. AME Publishing Company 2015-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4708271/ /pubmed/26816813 http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.01.11 Text en 2015 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Review Article
Stein, Daniel M.
Santucci, Richard A.
Pro: endoscopic realignment for pelvic fracture urethral injuries
title Pro: endoscopic realignment for pelvic fracture urethral injuries
title_full Pro: endoscopic realignment for pelvic fracture urethral injuries
title_fullStr Pro: endoscopic realignment for pelvic fracture urethral injuries
title_full_unstemmed Pro: endoscopic realignment for pelvic fracture urethral injuries
title_short Pro: endoscopic realignment for pelvic fracture urethral injuries
title_sort pro: endoscopic realignment for pelvic fracture urethral injuries
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816813
http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.01.11
work_keys_str_mv AT steindanielm proendoscopicrealignmentforpelvicfractureurethralinjuries
AT santucciricharda proendoscopicrealignmentforpelvicfractureurethralinjuries