Cargando…

In situ urethroplasty after artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion

Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) cuff erosion is a challenging complication traditionally managed with device removal and Foley catheter drainage. Urethral stricture can result secondary to the healing process, delaying AUS reimplantation. In situ urethroplasty (ISU) technique is a definitive repa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siegel, Jordan A., Tausch, Timothy J., Morey, Allen F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.01.12
_version_ 1782409432829788160
author Siegel, Jordan A.
Tausch, Timothy J.
Morey, Allen F.
author_facet Siegel, Jordan A.
Tausch, Timothy J.
Morey, Allen F.
author_sort Siegel, Jordan A.
collection PubMed
description Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) cuff erosion is a challenging complication traditionally managed with device removal and Foley catheter drainage. Urethral stricture can result secondary to the healing process, delaying AUS reimplantation. In situ urethroplasty (ISU) technique is a definitive repair at the time of device removal. Early results demonstrate a decreased rate of stricture formation compared to traditional management with little additional operative time and no additional complications. Patients undergoing ISU have less delay prior to AUS reimplantation, leading to possible benefit in health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4708275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47082752016-01-26 In situ urethroplasty after artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion Siegel, Jordan A. Tausch, Timothy J. Morey, Allen F. Transl Androl Urol Review Article Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) cuff erosion is a challenging complication traditionally managed with device removal and Foley catheter drainage. Urethral stricture can result secondary to the healing process, delaying AUS reimplantation. In situ urethroplasty (ISU) technique is a definitive repair at the time of device removal. Early results demonstrate a decreased rate of stricture formation compared to traditional management with little additional operative time and no additional complications. Patients undergoing ISU have less delay prior to AUS reimplantation, leading to possible benefit in health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes. AME Publishing Company 2015-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4708275/ /pubmed/26816810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.01.12 Text en 2015 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Review Article
Siegel, Jordan A.
Tausch, Timothy J.
Morey, Allen F.
In situ urethroplasty after artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion
title In situ urethroplasty after artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion
title_full In situ urethroplasty after artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion
title_fullStr In situ urethroplasty after artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion
title_full_unstemmed In situ urethroplasty after artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion
title_short In situ urethroplasty after artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion
title_sort in situ urethroplasty after artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.01.12
work_keys_str_mv AT siegeljordana insituurethroplastyafterartificialurinarysphinctercufferosion
AT tauschtimothyj insituurethroplastyafterartificialurinarysphinctercufferosion
AT moreyallenf insituurethroplastyafterartificialurinarysphinctercufferosion