Cargando…

AB116. Clinical efficacy and safety of molecular targeted drugs as first-line treatment for mRCC: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: To compare five molecular targeted drugs (MTD) with interferon-α (IFN-α) and evaluate their clinical efficacy and adverse events as first line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: We conducted a systemic review and network meta-analysis of all relevant randomized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mo, Chengqiang, Sheng, Jin, Tan, Wulin, Liu, Jingchao, Yu, Zhou, Chen, Xu, Mao, Xiaopeng, Qiu, Shaopeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708498/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2014.s116
_version_ 1782409482315235328
author Mo, Chengqiang
Sheng, Jin
Tan, Wulin
Liu, Jingchao
Yu, Zhou
Chen, Xu
Mao, Xiaopeng
Qiu, Shaopeng
author_facet Mo, Chengqiang
Sheng, Jin
Tan, Wulin
Liu, Jingchao
Yu, Zhou
Chen, Xu
Mao, Xiaopeng
Qiu, Shaopeng
author_sort Mo, Chengqiang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare five molecular targeted drugs (MTD) with interferon-α (IFN-α) and evaluate their clinical efficacy and adverse events as first line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: We conducted a systemic review and network meta-analysis of all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing MTD and IFN-αthrough a comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Science Direct, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from January 2005 to April 2014. RESULTS: Eight articles with 4,718 patients were finally identified. No statistically significant difference existed between direct and indirect evidences and the convergence of analysing model was guaranteed. With INF-αas baseline, the OR values of five MTD (pazopanib, axitinib, bevacizumab + INF-α, sunitinib, sofafenib) in terms of objective response rate (ORR), were separately: 4.00, 95% CI, 0.25-52.88); 3.46, 95% CI, 0.16-52.20); 3.21, 95% CI, 0.84-12.79); 2.94, 95% CI, 0.55-12.81); 1.18, 95% CI, 0.17-6.63). When it comes to adverse events, the OR values and 95% CI of 5 MTD (sunitinib, bevacizumab + INF-α, axitinib, pazopanib, sofafenib) were separately: 3.65, 95% CI, 0.65-20.32; 3.22, 95% CI, 0.71-16.06; 1.77, 95% CI, 0.07-47.59; 1.45, 95% CI, 0.08-31.05; 0.65, 95% CI, 0.09-4.25. The probabilities of being the most efficacious treatments in terms of ORR were: pazopanib (37%), axitinib (34%), bevacizumab + IFN (21%), sunitinib (8%), sorafinib (1%) and IFN (0%). The probabilities of having least ≥ grade 3 adverse events were: sorafenib (52%), pazopanib (18%), IFN-α (17%), axitinib (11%), bevacizumab + IFN-α (1%), sunitinib (0%). CONCLUSIONS: MTD was found to be superior to IFN-α in ORR but possessed of more ≥ grade 3 adverse events as first line treatment for patients with mRCC. Pazopanib, an oral MTD, was identified as a relatively rational choice. More well-designed and qualified trials are required to confirm these findings and investigate the clinical effective of MTD for the treatment of mRCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4708498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47084982016-01-26 AB116. Clinical efficacy and safety of molecular targeted drugs as first-line treatment for mRCC: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Mo, Chengqiang Sheng, Jin Tan, Wulin Liu, Jingchao Yu, Zhou Chen, Xu Mao, Xiaopeng Qiu, Shaopeng Transl Androl Urol Abstract Publication Urology OBJECTIVES: To compare five molecular targeted drugs (MTD) with interferon-α (IFN-α) and evaluate their clinical efficacy and adverse events as first line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: We conducted a systemic review and network meta-analysis of all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing MTD and IFN-αthrough a comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Science Direct, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from January 2005 to April 2014. RESULTS: Eight articles with 4,718 patients were finally identified. No statistically significant difference existed between direct and indirect evidences and the convergence of analysing model was guaranteed. With INF-αas baseline, the OR values of five MTD (pazopanib, axitinib, bevacizumab + INF-α, sunitinib, sofafenib) in terms of objective response rate (ORR), were separately: 4.00, 95% CI, 0.25-52.88); 3.46, 95% CI, 0.16-52.20); 3.21, 95% CI, 0.84-12.79); 2.94, 95% CI, 0.55-12.81); 1.18, 95% CI, 0.17-6.63). When it comes to adverse events, the OR values and 95% CI of 5 MTD (sunitinib, bevacizumab + INF-α, axitinib, pazopanib, sofafenib) were separately: 3.65, 95% CI, 0.65-20.32; 3.22, 95% CI, 0.71-16.06; 1.77, 95% CI, 0.07-47.59; 1.45, 95% CI, 0.08-31.05; 0.65, 95% CI, 0.09-4.25. The probabilities of being the most efficacious treatments in terms of ORR were: pazopanib (37%), axitinib (34%), bevacizumab + IFN (21%), sunitinib (8%), sorafinib (1%) and IFN (0%). The probabilities of having least ≥ grade 3 adverse events were: sorafenib (52%), pazopanib (18%), IFN-α (17%), axitinib (11%), bevacizumab + IFN-α (1%), sunitinib (0%). CONCLUSIONS: MTD was found to be superior to IFN-α in ORR but possessed of more ≥ grade 3 adverse events as first line treatment for patients with mRCC. Pazopanib, an oral MTD, was identified as a relatively rational choice. More well-designed and qualified trials are required to confirm these findings and investigate the clinical effective of MTD for the treatment of mRCC. AME Publishing Company 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4708498/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2014.s116 Text en 2014 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Abstract Publication Urology
Mo, Chengqiang
Sheng, Jin
Tan, Wulin
Liu, Jingchao
Yu, Zhou
Chen, Xu
Mao, Xiaopeng
Qiu, Shaopeng
AB116. Clinical efficacy and safety of molecular targeted drugs as first-line treatment for mRCC: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title AB116. Clinical efficacy and safety of molecular targeted drugs as first-line treatment for mRCC: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full AB116. Clinical efficacy and safety of molecular targeted drugs as first-line treatment for mRCC: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr AB116. Clinical efficacy and safety of molecular targeted drugs as first-line treatment for mRCC: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed AB116. Clinical efficacy and safety of molecular targeted drugs as first-line treatment for mRCC: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short AB116. Clinical efficacy and safety of molecular targeted drugs as first-line treatment for mRCC: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort ab116. clinical efficacy and safety of molecular targeted drugs as first-line treatment for mrcc: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Abstract Publication Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708498/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2014.s116
work_keys_str_mv AT mochengqiang ab116clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmoleculartargeteddrugsasfirstlinetreatmentformrccasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT shengjin ab116clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmoleculartargeteddrugsasfirstlinetreatmentformrccasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT tanwulin ab116clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmoleculartargeteddrugsasfirstlinetreatmentformrccasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT liujingchao ab116clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmoleculartargeteddrugsasfirstlinetreatmentformrccasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT yuzhou ab116clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmoleculartargeteddrugsasfirstlinetreatmentformrccasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenxu ab116clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmoleculartargeteddrugsasfirstlinetreatmentformrccasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT maoxiaopeng ab116clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmoleculartargeteddrugsasfirstlinetreatmentformrccasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT qiushaopeng ab116clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmoleculartargeteddrugsasfirstlinetreatmentformrccasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis