Cargando…

Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: patients’ attitude and feasibility in China

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the behavior of Chinese erectile dysfunction (ED) patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) who were offered the penile rehabilitation and to assess their attitude and feasibility of rehabilitation after RP in China. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Comprehensive medical and sexual h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Yi-Jun, Li, Jian, Ye, Ding-Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816718
http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2013.01.06
_version_ 1782409504982302720
author Shen, Yi-Jun
Li, Jian
Ye, Ding-Wei
author_facet Shen, Yi-Jun
Li, Jian
Ye, Ding-Wei
author_sort Shen, Yi-Jun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the behavior of Chinese erectile dysfunction (ED) patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) who were offered the penile rehabilitation and to assess their attitude and feasibility of rehabilitation after RP in China. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Comprehensive medical and sexual histories of 187 evaluable PCa patients for RP were obtained together with their attitude towards penile rehabilitation. The rehabilitation data was compared between patients who accepted this treatment or not. The successful intercourse rate six months after treatment was also compared among three rehabilitation interventions, including phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE-5i), vacuum erection device (VED) and combination of both. RESULTS: 141 (75.4%) patients reported being sexually active in the six months before RP.122 (65.2%) patients wished to preserve sexual activity and 80 (42.8%) had interest in penile rehabilitation after RP. Penile rehabilitation rate was 30.5%. The patients with younger age (P<0.001), higher IIEF-5 score preoperatively (P=0.03) and no adjuvant therapy post-RP (P=0.01) were more acceptable for rehabilitation. Main reasons for refusal of rehabilitation included lack of sexual interest followed by high cost of treatment. The successful intercourse rate was not significantly different among three rehabilitation interventions (P=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Less than one-third of Chinese RP patients accepted penile rehabilitation postoperatively. Patients’ attitude towards rehabilitation was conservative because of many reasons from traditional Chinese culture, doctors and patients themselves. Penile rehabilitation was feasible and effective in Chinese RP patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4708603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47086032016-01-26 Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: patients’ attitude and feasibility in China Shen, Yi-Jun Li, Jian Ye, Ding-Wei Transl Androl Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the behavior of Chinese erectile dysfunction (ED) patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) who were offered the penile rehabilitation and to assess their attitude and feasibility of rehabilitation after RP in China. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Comprehensive medical and sexual histories of 187 evaluable PCa patients for RP were obtained together with their attitude towards penile rehabilitation. The rehabilitation data was compared between patients who accepted this treatment or not. The successful intercourse rate six months after treatment was also compared among three rehabilitation interventions, including phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE-5i), vacuum erection device (VED) and combination of both. RESULTS: 141 (75.4%) patients reported being sexually active in the six months before RP.122 (65.2%) patients wished to preserve sexual activity and 80 (42.8%) had interest in penile rehabilitation after RP. Penile rehabilitation rate was 30.5%. The patients with younger age (P<0.001), higher IIEF-5 score preoperatively (P=0.03) and no adjuvant therapy post-RP (P=0.01) were more acceptable for rehabilitation. Main reasons for refusal of rehabilitation included lack of sexual interest followed by high cost of treatment. The successful intercourse rate was not significantly different among three rehabilitation interventions (P=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Less than one-third of Chinese RP patients accepted penile rehabilitation postoperatively. Patients’ attitude towards rehabilitation was conservative because of many reasons from traditional Chinese culture, doctors and patients themselves. Penile rehabilitation was feasible and effective in Chinese RP patients. AME Publishing Company 2013-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4708603/ /pubmed/26816718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2013.01.06 Text en 2013 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shen, Yi-Jun
Li, Jian
Ye, Ding-Wei
Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: patients’ attitude and feasibility in China
title Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: patients’ attitude and feasibility in China
title_full Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: patients’ attitude and feasibility in China
title_fullStr Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: patients’ attitude and feasibility in China
title_full_unstemmed Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: patients’ attitude and feasibility in China
title_short Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: patients’ attitude and feasibility in China
title_sort penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: patients’ attitude and feasibility in china
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816718
http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2013.01.06
work_keys_str_mv AT shenyijun penilerehabilitationafterradicalprostatectomypatientsattitudeandfeasibilityinchina
AT lijian penilerehabilitationafterradicalprostatectomypatientsattitudeandfeasibilityinchina
AT yedingwei penilerehabilitationafterradicalprostatectomypatientsattitudeandfeasibilityinchina