Cargando…
Blocking Spatial Navigation Across Environments That Have a Different Shape
According to the geometric module hypothesis, organisms encode a global representation of the space in which they navigate, and this representation is not prone to interference from other cues. A number of studies, however, have shown that both human and non-human animals can navigate on the basis o...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26569017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xan0000084 |
_version_ | 1782409506791096320 |
---|---|
author | Buckley, Matthew G. Smith, Alastair D. Haselgrove, Mark |
author_facet | Buckley, Matthew G. Smith, Alastair D. Haselgrove, Mark |
author_sort | Buckley, Matthew G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | According to the geometric module hypothesis, organisms encode a global representation of the space in which they navigate, and this representation is not prone to interference from other cues. A number of studies, however, have shown that both human and non-human animals can navigate on the basis of local geometric cues provided by the shape of an environment. According to the model of spatial learning proposed by Miller and Shettleworth (2007, 2008), geometric cues compete for associative strength in the same manner as non-geometric cues do. The experiments reported here were designed to test if humans learn about local geometric cues in a manner consistent with the Miller-Shettleworth model. Experiment 1 replicated previous findings that humans transfer navigational behavior, based on local geometric cues, from a rectangle-shaped environment to a kite-shaped environment, and vice versa. In Experiments 2 and 3, it was observed that learning about non-geometric cues blocked, and were blocked by, learning about local geometric cues. The reciprocal blocking observed is consistent with associative theories of spatial learning; however, it is difficult to explain the observed effects with theories of global-shape encoding in their current form. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4708615 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | American Psychological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47086152016-01-20 Blocking Spatial Navigation Across Environments That Have a Different Shape Buckley, Matthew G. Smith, Alastair D. Haselgrove, Mark J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn Article According to the geometric module hypothesis, organisms encode a global representation of the space in which they navigate, and this representation is not prone to interference from other cues. A number of studies, however, have shown that both human and non-human animals can navigate on the basis of local geometric cues provided by the shape of an environment. According to the model of spatial learning proposed by Miller and Shettleworth (2007, 2008), geometric cues compete for associative strength in the same manner as non-geometric cues do. The experiments reported here were designed to test if humans learn about local geometric cues in a manner consistent with the Miller-Shettleworth model. Experiment 1 replicated previous findings that humans transfer navigational behavior, based on local geometric cues, from a rectangle-shaped environment to a kite-shaped environment, and vice versa. In Experiments 2 and 3, it was observed that learning about non-geometric cues blocked, and were blocked by, learning about local geometric cues. The reciprocal blocking observed is consistent with associative theories of spatial learning; however, it is difficult to explain the observed effects with theories of global-shape encoding in their current form. American Psychological Association 2015-11-16 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4708615/ /pubmed/26569017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xan0000084 Text en © 2015 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s). Author(s) grant(s) the American Psychological Association the exclusive right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. |
spellingShingle | Article Buckley, Matthew G. Smith, Alastair D. Haselgrove, Mark Blocking Spatial Navigation Across Environments That Have a Different Shape |
title | Blocking Spatial Navigation Across Environments That Have a Different Shape |
title_full | Blocking Spatial Navigation Across Environments That Have a Different Shape |
title_fullStr | Blocking Spatial Navigation Across Environments That Have a Different Shape |
title_full_unstemmed | Blocking Spatial Navigation Across Environments That Have a Different Shape |
title_short | Blocking Spatial Navigation Across Environments That Have a Different Shape |
title_sort | blocking spatial navigation across environments that have a different shape |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26569017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xan0000084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buckleymatthewg blockingspatialnavigationacrossenvironmentsthathaveadifferentshape AT smithalastaird blockingspatialnavigationacrossenvironmentsthathaveadifferentshape AT haselgrovemark blockingspatialnavigationacrossenvironmentsthathaveadifferentshape |