Cargando…
A first study comparing preservation of a ready‐to‐eat soup under pressure (hyperbaric storage) at 25°C and 30°C with refrigeration
Hyperbaric storage (HS), storage under pressure at 25°C and 30°C, of a ready‐to‐eat (RTE) soup was studied and compared with refrigeration. Soup was stored at different time (4 and 8 h), temperature (4°C, 25°C, and 30°C), and pressure (0.1, 100, and 150 MPa) conditions, to compare microbial loads an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26788288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.212 |
_version_ | 1782409513786146816 |
---|---|
author | Moreira, Sílvia A. Fernandes, Pedro A. R. Duarte, Ricardo Santos, Diana I. Fidalgo, Liliana G. Santos, Mauro D. Queirós, Rui P. Delgadillo, Ivonne Saraiva, Jorge A. |
author_facet | Moreira, Sílvia A. Fernandes, Pedro A. R. Duarte, Ricardo Santos, Diana I. Fidalgo, Liliana G. Santos, Mauro D. Queirós, Rui P. Delgadillo, Ivonne Saraiva, Jorge A. |
author_sort | Moreira, Sílvia A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hyperbaric storage (HS), storage under pressure at 25°C and 30°C, of a ready‐to‐eat (RTE) soup was studied and compared with refrigeration. Soup was stored at different time (4 and 8 h), temperature (4°C, 25°C, and 30°C), and pressure (0.1, 100, and 150 MPa) conditions, to compare microbial loads and physicochemical parameters. HS resulted in similar (microbial growth inhibition) to better (microbial inactivation) results compared to refrigeration, leading to equal and lower microbial loads, respectively, at the end of storage. Lower/higher pressure (100 vs. 150 MPa) and shorter/longer storage times (4 vs. 8 h) resulted in more pronounced microbial growth inhibition/microbial inactivation. Aerobic mesophiles showed less susceptibility to HS, compared to Enterobacteriaceae and yeast and molds. HS maintained generally the physicochemical parameters at values similar to refrigeration. Thus, HS with no need for temperature control throughout storage and so basically energetically costless, is a potential alternative to refrigeration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4708648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47086482016-01-19 A first study comparing preservation of a ready‐to‐eat soup under pressure (hyperbaric storage) at 25°C and 30°C with refrigeration Moreira, Sílvia A. Fernandes, Pedro A. R. Duarte, Ricardo Santos, Diana I. Fidalgo, Liliana G. Santos, Mauro D. Queirós, Rui P. Delgadillo, Ivonne Saraiva, Jorge A. Food Sci Nutr Original Research Hyperbaric storage (HS), storage under pressure at 25°C and 30°C, of a ready‐to‐eat (RTE) soup was studied and compared with refrigeration. Soup was stored at different time (4 and 8 h), temperature (4°C, 25°C, and 30°C), and pressure (0.1, 100, and 150 MPa) conditions, to compare microbial loads and physicochemical parameters. HS resulted in similar (microbial growth inhibition) to better (microbial inactivation) results compared to refrigeration, leading to equal and lower microbial loads, respectively, at the end of storage. Lower/higher pressure (100 vs. 150 MPa) and shorter/longer storage times (4 vs. 8 h) resulted in more pronounced microbial growth inhibition/microbial inactivation. Aerobic mesophiles showed less susceptibility to HS, compared to Enterobacteriaceae and yeast and molds. HS maintained generally the physicochemical parameters at values similar to refrigeration. Thus, HS with no need for temperature control throughout storage and so basically energetically costless, is a potential alternative to refrigeration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4708648/ /pubmed/26788288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.212 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Moreira, Sílvia A. Fernandes, Pedro A. R. Duarte, Ricardo Santos, Diana I. Fidalgo, Liliana G. Santos, Mauro D. Queirós, Rui P. Delgadillo, Ivonne Saraiva, Jorge A. A first study comparing preservation of a ready‐to‐eat soup under pressure (hyperbaric storage) at 25°C and 30°C with refrigeration |
title | A first study comparing preservation of a ready‐to‐eat soup under pressure (hyperbaric storage) at 25°C and 30°C with refrigeration |
title_full | A first study comparing preservation of a ready‐to‐eat soup under pressure (hyperbaric storage) at 25°C and 30°C with refrigeration |
title_fullStr | A first study comparing preservation of a ready‐to‐eat soup under pressure (hyperbaric storage) at 25°C and 30°C with refrigeration |
title_full_unstemmed | A first study comparing preservation of a ready‐to‐eat soup under pressure (hyperbaric storage) at 25°C and 30°C with refrigeration |
title_short | A first study comparing preservation of a ready‐to‐eat soup under pressure (hyperbaric storage) at 25°C and 30°C with refrigeration |
title_sort | first study comparing preservation of a ready‐to‐eat soup under pressure (hyperbaric storage) at 25°c and 30°c with refrigeration |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26788288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moreirasilviaa afirststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT fernandespedroar afirststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT duartericardo afirststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT santosdianai afirststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT fidalgolilianag afirststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT santosmaurod afirststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT queirosruip afirststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT delgadilloivonne afirststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT saraivajorgea afirststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT moreirasilviaa firststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT fernandespedroar firststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT duartericardo firststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT santosdianai firststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT fidalgolilianag firststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT santosmaurod firststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT queirosruip firststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT delgadilloivonne firststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration AT saraivajorgea firststudycomparingpreservationofareadytoeatsoupunderpressurehyperbaricstorageat25cand30cwithrefrigeration |