Cargando…

AB058. Clinic practice of the laparoscopic ileal bladder augmentation

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic ileal bladder augmentation in treating patients with low compliant bladder dysfunction. METHODS: From June 2011 to December 2013, 22 patients with low compliant bladder dysfunction were enrolled and received laparoscopic ileal bladder...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Zhihui, Qi, Xiaolong, Liu, Feng, Zhang, Dahong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708764/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.s058
_version_ 1782409540130570240
author Xu, Zhihui
Qi, Xiaolong
Liu, Feng
Zhang, Dahong
author_facet Xu, Zhihui
Qi, Xiaolong
Liu, Feng
Zhang, Dahong
author_sort Xu, Zhihui
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic ileal bladder augmentation in treating patients with low compliant bladder dysfunction. METHODS: From June 2011 to December 2013, 22 patients with low compliant bladder dysfunction were enrolled and received laparoscopic ileal bladder expanding. Postoperative complications, renal function, hydronephrosis, glomerular filtration rate, urodynamics parameters and quality of daily life were evaluated. RESULTS: The laparoscopic ileal bladder expanding were all successful. The average operation time was (105.0±16.7) min, the bleeding volume was (90.0±26.0) mL, the recovery time of intestinal function was (2.5±0.7) days, the hospitalization time was (15.0±4.2) days. All the patients had no serious complications, such as ileum anastomotic fistula, intestinal obstruction and abdominal infection or sepsis. Among them, 17 patients were followed up for more than 12 months. Compared with the preoperative condition, the average bladder capacity and bladder compliance were significantly increased from (103.0±38.2) cmH(2)O to (403.0±45.8) cmH(2)O, and from (9.6±3.1) to (38.1±4.4) mL/cmH(2)O (P<0.001), respectively. And the average bladder pressure at the end of filling phrase of cystometry were significantly decreased from (45.3±15.8) cmH(2)O to (16.5±6.4) cmH(2)O (P<0.001). The preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine level were (183.5±32.2) μmol/L and (120±28.4) μmol/L (P<0.001), respectively. The preoperative and postoperative total glomerular filtration rate were (40.0±25.5) mL/min/1.73m(2) and (62.0±28.6) mL/min/1.73m(2) (P<0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The operation of laparoscopic ileal bladder expanding is feasible and security, with the advantages of little injury, less bleeding, quicker recovery of intestinal function and less postoperative complications. The bladder function was obviously improved after operations, which can effectively protect the patient’s upper tract functions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4708764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47087642016-01-26 AB058. Clinic practice of the laparoscopic ileal bladder augmentation Xu, Zhihui Qi, Xiaolong Liu, Feng Zhang, Dahong Transl Androl Urol Podium Lecture OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic ileal bladder augmentation in treating patients with low compliant bladder dysfunction. METHODS: From June 2011 to December 2013, 22 patients with low compliant bladder dysfunction were enrolled and received laparoscopic ileal bladder expanding. Postoperative complications, renal function, hydronephrosis, glomerular filtration rate, urodynamics parameters and quality of daily life were evaluated. RESULTS: The laparoscopic ileal bladder expanding were all successful. The average operation time was (105.0±16.7) min, the bleeding volume was (90.0±26.0) mL, the recovery time of intestinal function was (2.5±0.7) days, the hospitalization time was (15.0±4.2) days. All the patients had no serious complications, such as ileum anastomotic fistula, intestinal obstruction and abdominal infection or sepsis. Among them, 17 patients were followed up for more than 12 months. Compared with the preoperative condition, the average bladder capacity and bladder compliance were significantly increased from (103.0±38.2) cmH(2)O to (403.0±45.8) cmH(2)O, and from (9.6±3.1) to (38.1±4.4) mL/cmH(2)O (P<0.001), respectively. And the average bladder pressure at the end of filling phrase of cystometry were significantly decreased from (45.3±15.8) cmH(2)O to (16.5±6.4) cmH(2)O (P<0.001). The preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine level were (183.5±32.2) μmol/L and (120±28.4) μmol/L (P<0.001), respectively. The preoperative and postoperative total glomerular filtration rate were (40.0±25.5) mL/min/1.73m(2) and (62.0±28.6) mL/min/1.73m(2) (P<0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The operation of laparoscopic ileal bladder expanding is feasible and security, with the advantages of little injury, less bleeding, quicker recovery of intestinal function and less postoperative complications. The bladder function was obviously improved after operations, which can effectively protect the patient’s upper tract functions. AME Publishing Company 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4708764/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.s058 Text en 2015 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Podium Lecture
Xu, Zhihui
Qi, Xiaolong
Liu, Feng
Zhang, Dahong
AB058. Clinic practice of the laparoscopic ileal bladder augmentation
title AB058. Clinic practice of the laparoscopic ileal bladder augmentation
title_full AB058. Clinic practice of the laparoscopic ileal bladder augmentation
title_fullStr AB058. Clinic practice of the laparoscopic ileal bladder augmentation
title_full_unstemmed AB058. Clinic practice of the laparoscopic ileal bladder augmentation
title_short AB058. Clinic practice of the laparoscopic ileal bladder augmentation
title_sort ab058. clinic practice of the laparoscopic ileal bladder augmentation
topic Podium Lecture
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708764/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.s058
work_keys_str_mv AT xuzhihui ab058clinicpracticeofthelaparoscopicilealbladderaugmentation
AT qixiaolong ab058clinicpracticeofthelaparoscopicilealbladderaugmentation
AT liufeng ab058clinicpracticeofthelaparoscopicilealbladderaugmentation
AT zhangdahong ab058clinicpracticeofthelaparoscopicilealbladderaugmentation