Cargando…

AB032. Penile rehabilitation using Vacuum Erection Device for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most common complications of radical prostatectomy (RP), and seriously affecting the quality of life for patients after RP. At present, more and more doctors and patients increasingly accept and use penile rehabilitation therapies to treat ED post-R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Dingwei, Shen, Yijun, Dai, Bo, Zhang, Hailiang, Shi, Guohai, Zhu, Yao, Zhu, Yiping, Lu, Xiaolin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708787/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.s032
_version_ 1782409545486696448
author Ye, Dingwei
Shen, Yijun
Dai, Bo
Zhang, Hailiang
Shi, Guohai
Zhu, Yao
Zhu, Yiping
Lu, Xiaolin
author_facet Ye, Dingwei
Shen, Yijun
Dai, Bo
Zhang, Hailiang
Shi, Guohai
Zhu, Yao
Zhu, Yiping
Lu, Xiaolin
author_sort Ye, Dingwei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most common complications of radical prostatectomy (RP), and seriously affecting the quality of life for patients after RP. At present, more and more doctors and patients increasingly accept and use penile rehabilitation therapies to treat ED post-RP. Among them, the vacuum erectile device (VED), a non-invasive means, can improve hypoxia within the penis and inhibit smooth muscle cell apoptosis and cavernous fibrosis. We summarize the efficacy of VED for treatment of ED after RP, and investigate patient compliance and satisfaction. METHODS: One group of 259 patients undergoing RP, including 143 cases of open RP, 116 cases of laparoscopic RP. All patients used VED (Osbon, Timm Medical, Inc.) for rehabilitation within 3 months after RP. Another group undergoing RP but not using VED was control. IIEF-5 scores, length and circumference of penis and SEP3 percentage were compared between these groups before and after RP. The compliance of VED and satisfaction for rehabilitation were also compared. RESULTS: The IIEF-5 score after 6 months rehabilitation was significantly higher in the patients using VED than that in the controls (P<0.05).The shortening of penile length and circumference after VED were also significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The average length using VED was 10 months (1-18 months), and IIEF-5 score and penile length and circumference were higher in those using VED more than 1 year than those using less than six months (P<0.05). The SEP3 and satisfaction rate were significantly higher in 172 cases undergoing neurovascular-bundle-sparing RP than controls (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The early use of VED rehabilitation can improve erectile function for RP patients, help to preserve the length and reduce the shrinkage of penis. Long-term use of VED can have better results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4708787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47087872016-01-26 AB032. Penile rehabilitation using Vacuum Erection Device for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy Ye, Dingwei Shen, Yijun Dai, Bo Zhang, Hailiang Shi, Guohai Zhu, Yao Zhu, Yiping Lu, Xiaolin Transl Androl Urol Podium Lecture OBJECTIVE: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most common complications of radical prostatectomy (RP), and seriously affecting the quality of life for patients after RP. At present, more and more doctors and patients increasingly accept and use penile rehabilitation therapies to treat ED post-RP. Among them, the vacuum erectile device (VED), a non-invasive means, can improve hypoxia within the penis and inhibit smooth muscle cell apoptosis and cavernous fibrosis. We summarize the efficacy of VED for treatment of ED after RP, and investigate patient compliance and satisfaction. METHODS: One group of 259 patients undergoing RP, including 143 cases of open RP, 116 cases of laparoscopic RP. All patients used VED (Osbon, Timm Medical, Inc.) for rehabilitation within 3 months after RP. Another group undergoing RP but not using VED was control. IIEF-5 scores, length and circumference of penis and SEP3 percentage were compared between these groups before and after RP. The compliance of VED and satisfaction for rehabilitation were also compared. RESULTS: The IIEF-5 score after 6 months rehabilitation was significantly higher in the patients using VED than that in the controls (P<0.05).The shortening of penile length and circumference after VED were also significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The average length using VED was 10 months (1-18 months), and IIEF-5 score and penile length and circumference were higher in those using VED more than 1 year than those using less than six months (P<0.05). The SEP3 and satisfaction rate were significantly higher in 172 cases undergoing neurovascular-bundle-sparing RP than controls (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The early use of VED rehabilitation can improve erectile function for RP patients, help to preserve the length and reduce the shrinkage of penis. Long-term use of VED can have better results. AME Publishing Company 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4708787/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.s032 Text en 2015 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Podium Lecture
Ye, Dingwei
Shen, Yijun
Dai, Bo
Zhang, Hailiang
Shi, Guohai
Zhu, Yao
Zhu, Yiping
Lu, Xiaolin
AB032. Penile rehabilitation using Vacuum Erection Device for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy
title AB032. Penile rehabilitation using Vacuum Erection Device for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy
title_full AB032. Penile rehabilitation using Vacuum Erection Device for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr AB032. Penile rehabilitation using Vacuum Erection Device for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed AB032. Penile rehabilitation using Vacuum Erection Device for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy
title_short AB032. Penile rehabilitation using Vacuum Erection Device for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy
title_sort ab032. penile rehabilitation using vacuum erection device for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy
topic Podium Lecture
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708787/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.s032
work_keys_str_mv AT yedingwei ab032penilerehabilitationusingvacuumerectiondeviceforerectiledysfunctionafterradicalprostatectomy
AT shenyijun ab032penilerehabilitationusingvacuumerectiondeviceforerectiledysfunctionafterradicalprostatectomy
AT daibo ab032penilerehabilitationusingvacuumerectiondeviceforerectiledysfunctionafterradicalprostatectomy
AT zhanghailiang ab032penilerehabilitationusingvacuumerectiondeviceforerectiledysfunctionafterradicalprostatectomy
AT shiguohai ab032penilerehabilitationusingvacuumerectiondeviceforerectiledysfunctionafterradicalprostatectomy
AT zhuyao ab032penilerehabilitationusingvacuumerectiondeviceforerectiledysfunctionafterradicalprostatectomy
AT zhuyiping ab032penilerehabilitationusingvacuumerectiondeviceforerectiledysfunctionafterradicalprostatectomy
AT luxiaolin ab032penilerehabilitationusingvacuumerectiondeviceforerectiledysfunctionafterradicalprostatectomy