Cargando…

Thrombotic risk assessment in 185 WHO-defined essential thrombocythemia patients: single center experience

Thrombosis risk in essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients can be assessed using different prognostic systems. Conventional risk factors include age more than 60 years and history of previous thrombosis. In addition, other factors such as JAK2 V617F mutations, cardiovascular risk factors, leukocytos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dambrauskiene, Ruta, Gerbutavicius, Rolandas, Juozaityte, Elona, Gerbutaviciene, Rima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4709397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26793025
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2015.54083
_version_ 1782409634023211008
author Dambrauskiene, Ruta
Gerbutavicius, Rolandas
Juozaityte, Elona
Gerbutaviciene, Rima
author_facet Dambrauskiene, Ruta
Gerbutavicius, Rolandas
Juozaityte, Elona
Gerbutaviciene, Rima
author_sort Dambrauskiene, Ruta
collection PubMed
description Thrombosis risk in essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients can be assessed using different prognostic systems. Conventional risk factors include age more than 60 years and history of previous thrombosis. In addition, other factors such as JAK2 V617F mutations, cardiovascular risk factors, leukocytosis more than 11 × 10(9)/l, thrombophilic factors and platelet count more than 1500 × 10(9)/l are used in different hematology centers as high-risk features for thrombosis. Our study compared different risk model groups for thrombosis in 185 WHO-defined ET patients at the Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Klinikos. We found that patient distribution in low, intermediate- and high-risk groups varies using different risk stratification models. The biggest difference in risk assignment is evident in patients who are older than 60 years and have no other risk factors and in patients who are younger than 60 years but have other risk factors. This observation suggests that new prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to better stratify patients at risk for thrombosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4709397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47093972016-01-20 Thrombotic risk assessment in 185 WHO-defined essential thrombocythemia patients: single center experience Dambrauskiene, Ruta Gerbutavicius, Rolandas Juozaityte, Elona Gerbutaviciene, Rima Contemp Oncol (Pozn) Original Paper Thrombosis risk in essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients can be assessed using different prognostic systems. Conventional risk factors include age more than 60 years and history of previous thrombosis. In addition, other factors such as JAK2 V617F mutations, cardiovascular risk factors, leukocytosis more than 11 × 10(9)/l, thrombophilic factors and platelet count more than 1500 × 10(9)/l are used in different hematology centers as high-risk features for thrombosis. Our study compared different risk model groups for thrombosis in 185 WHO-defined ET patients at the Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Klinikos. We found that patient distribution in low, intermediate- and high-risk groups varies using different risk stratification models. The biggest difference in risk assignment is evident in patients who are older than 60 years and have no other risk factors and in patients who are younger than 60 years but have other risk factors. This observation suggests that new prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to better stratify patients at risk for thrombosis. Termedia Publishing House 2015-09-16 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4709397/ /pubmed/26793025 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2015.54083 Text en Copyright © 2015 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Dambrauskiene, Ruta
Gerbutavicius, Rolandas
Juozaityte, Elona
Gerbutaviciene, Rima
Thrombotic risk assessment in 185 WHO-defined essential thrombocythemia patients: single center experience
title Thrombotic risk assessment in 185 WHO-defined essential thrombocythemia patients: single center experience
title_full Thrombotic risk assessment in 185 WHO-defined essential thrombocythemia patients: single center experience
title_fullStr Thrombotic risk assessment in 185 WHO-defined essential thrombocythemia patients: single center experience
title_full_unstemmed Thrombotic risk assessment in 185 WHO-defined essential thrombocythemia patients: single center experience
title_short Thrombotic risk assessment in 185 WHO-defined essential thrombocythemia patients: single center experience
title_sort thrombotic risk assessment in 185 who-defined essential thrombocythemia patients: single center experience
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4709397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26793025
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2015.54083
work_keys_str_mv AT dambrauskieneruta thromboticriskassessmentin185whodefinedessentialthrombocythemiapatientssinglecenterexperience
AT gerbutaviciusrolandas thromboticriskassessmentin185whodefinedessentialthrombocythemiapatientssinglecenterexperience
AT juozaityteelona thromboticriskassessmentin185whodefinedessentialthrombocythemiapatientssinglecenterexperience
AT gerbutavicienerima thromboticriskassessmentin185whodefinedessentialthrombocythemiapatientssinglecenterexperience