Cargando…

Bilingualism and Cognitive Reserve: A Critical Overview and a Plea for Methodological Innovations

The decline of cognitive skills throughout healthy or pathological aging can be slowed down by experiences which foster cognitive reserve (CR). Recently, some studies on Alzheimer's disease have suggested that CR may be enhanced by life-long bilingualism. However, the evidence is inconsistent a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calvo, Noelia, García, Adolfo M., Manoiloff, Laura, Ibáñez, Agustín
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4709424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26793100
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00249
_version_ 1782409639840710656
author Calvo, Noelia
García, Adolfo M.
Manoiloff, Laura
Ibáñez, Agustín
author_facet Calvo, Noelia
García, Adolfo M.
Manoiloff, Laura
Ibáñez, Agustín
author_sort Calvo, Noelia
collection PubMed
description The decline of cognitive skills throughout healthy or pathological aging can be slowed down by experiences which foster cognitive reserve (CR). Recently, some studies on Alzheimer's disease have suggested that CR may be enhanced by life-long bilingualism. However, the evidence is inconsistent and largely based on retrospective approaches featuring several methodological weaknesses. Some studies demonstrated at least 4 years of delay in dementia symptoms, while others did not find such an effect. Moreover, various methodological aspects vary from study to study. The present paper addresses contradictory findings, identifies possible lurking variables, and outlines methodological alternatives thereof. First, we characterize possible confounding factors that may have influenced extant results. Our focus is on the criteria to establish bilingualism, differences in sample design, the instruments used to examine cognitive skills, and the role of variables known to modulate life-long cognition. Second, we propose that these limitations could be largely circumvented through experimental approaches. Proficiency in the non-native language can be successfully assessed by combining subjective and objective measures; confounding variables which have been distinctively associated with certain bilingual groups (e.g., alcoholism, sleep disorders) can be targeted through relevant instruments; and cognitive status might be better tapped via robust cognitive screenings and executive batteries. Moreover, future research should incorporate tasks yielding predictable patterns of contrastive performance between bilinguals and monolinguals. Crucially, these include instruments which reveal bilingual disadvantages in vocabulary, null effects in working memory, and advantages in inhibitory control and other executive functions. Finally, paradigms tapping proactive interference (which assess the disruptive effect of long-term memory on newly learned information) could also offer useful data, since this phenomenon seems to be better managed by bilinguals and it becomes conspicuous in early stages of dementia. Such considerations may shed light not just on the relationship between bilingualism and CR, but also on more general mechanisms of cognitive compensation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4709424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47094242016-01-20 Bilingualism and Cognitive Reserve: A Critical Overview and a Plea for Methodological Innovations Calvo, Noelia García, Adolfo M. Manoiloff, Laura Ibáñez, Agustín Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience The decline of cognitive skills throughout healthy or pathological aging can be slowed down by experiences which foster cognitive reserve (CR). Recently, some studies on Alzheimer's disease have suggested that CR may be enhanced by life-long bilingualism. However, the evidence is inconsistent and largely based on retrospective approaches featuring several methodological weaknesses. Some studies demonstrated at least 4 years of delay in dementia symptoms, while others did not find such an effect. Moreover, various methodological aspects vary from study to study. The present paper addresses contradictory findings, identifies possible lurking variables, and outlines methodological alternatives thereof. First, we characterize possible confounding factors that may have influenced extant results. Our focus is on the criteria to establish bilingualism, differences in sample design, the instruments used to examine cognitive skills, and the role of variables known to modulate life-long cognition. Second, we propose that these limitations could be largely circumvented through experimental approaches. Proficiency in the non-native language can be successfully assessed by combining subjective and objective measures; confounding variables which have been distinctively associated with certain bilingual groups (e.g., alcoholism, sleep disorders) can be targeted through relevant instruments; and cognitive status might be better tapped via robust cognitive screenings and executive batteries. Moreover, future research should incorporate tasks yielding predictable patterns of contrastive performance between bilinguals and monolinguals. Crucially, these include instruments which reveal bilingual disadvantages in vocabulary, null effects in working memory, and advantages in inhibitory control and other executive functions. Finally, paradigms tapping proactive interference (which assess the disruptive effect of long-term memory on newly learned information) could also offer useful data, since this phenomenon seems to be better managed by bilinguals and it becomes conspicuous in early stages of dementia. Such considerations may shed light not just on the relationship between bilingualism and CR, but also on more general mechanisms of cognitive compensation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4709424/ /pubmed/26793100 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00249 Text en Copyright © 2016 Calvo, García, Manoiloff and Ibáñez. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Calvo, Noelia
García, Adolfo M.
Manoiloff, Laura
Ibáñez, Agustín
Bilingualism and Cognitive Reserve: A Critical Overview and a Plea for Methodological Innovations
title Bilingualism and Cognitive Reserve: A Critical Overview and a Plea for Methodological Innovations
title_full Bilingualism and Cognitive Reserve: A Critical Overview and a Plea for Methodological Innovations
title_fullStr Bilingualism and Cognitive Reserve: A Critical Overview and a Plea for Methodological Innovations
title_full_unstemmed Bilingualism and Cognitive Reserve: A Critical Overview and a Plea for Methodological Innovations
title_short Bilingualism and Cognitive Reserve: A Critical Overview and a Plea for Methodological Innovations
title_sort bilingualism and cognitive reserve: a critical overview and a plea for methodological innovations
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4709424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26793100
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00249
work_keys_str_mv AT calvonoelia bilingualismandcognitivereserveacriticaloverviewandapleaformethodologicalinnovations
AT garciaadolfom bilingualismandcognitivereserveacriticaloverviewandapleaformethodologicalinnovations
AT manoilofflaura bilingualismandcognitivereserveacriticaloverviewandapleaformethodologicalinnovations
AT ibanezagustin bilingualismandcognitivereserveacriticaloverviewandapleaformethodologicalinnovations