Cargando…

Performance comparison of a new automated cuff pressure controller with currently available devices in both basic research and clinical settings

BACKGROUND: The management of tracheal tube cuff pressure in patients receiving mechanical ventilation is important for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Currently, cuff pressure is intermittently monitored with a pressure gauge and adjusted when necessary in a routine practice. How...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michikoshi, Junichi, Matsumoto, Shigekiyo, Miyawaki, Hiroshi, Niu, Harushi, Seo, Katsuhiro, Yamamoto, Makoto, Tokunaga, Shu-ichi, Kitano, Takaaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4709876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0126-7
_version_ 1782409729731985408
author Michikoshi, Junichi
Matsumoto, Shigekiyo
Miyawaki, Hiroshi
Niu, Harushi
Seo, Katsuhiro
Yamamoto, Makoto
Tokunaga, Shu-ichi
Kitano, Takaaki
author_facet Michikoshi, Junichi
Matsumoto, Shigekiyo
Miyawaki, Hiroshi
Niu, Harushi
Seo, Katsuhiro
Yamamoto, Makoto
Tokunaga, Shu-ichi
Kitano, Takaaki
author_sort Michikoshi, Junichi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The management of tracheal tube cuff pressure in patients receiving mechanical ventilation is important for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Currently, cuff pressure is intermittently monitored with a pressure gauge and adjusted when necessary in a routine practice. However, this method results in wide variations in pressure, and adequate management is difficult due to the spontaneous release of air from the cuff, which reduces cuff pressure. In order to continuously maintain a uniform cuff pressure, we developed a new automated cuff pressure controller and compared its properties with existing devices. METHODS: The effectiveness of the new device was assessed with a model trachea/lung and tracheal tube by measuring cuff pressure while on mechanical ventilation. An electrically powered automatic cuff controller or manual cuff pressure control was used for comparison purposes. The effectiveness of the new device was also examined in patients receiving mechanical ventilation by continuously measuring cuff pressure for a 24-h period. RESULTS: Cuff pressure was uniformly maintained with the new device. Moreover, in the clinical setting, variation in pressure from the set pressure was minimal with both the new device and existing device, relative to the intermittent monitoring method. This suggests that, as with the existing device, uniform cuff pressure management is possible with the new device. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the ability of the new cuff pressure controller to manage cuff pressure without the need of a power source, highlighting its potential utility in clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4709876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47098762016-01-13 Performance comparison of a new automated cuff pressure controller with currently available devices in both basic research and clinical settings Michikoshi, Junichi Matsumoto, Shigekiyo Miyawaki, Hiroshi Niu, Harushi Seo, Katsuhiro Yamamoto, Makoto Tokunaga, Shu-ichi Kitano, Takaaki J Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: The management of tracheal tube cuff pressure in patients receiving mechanical ventilation is important for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Currently, cuff pressure is intermittently monitored with a pressure gauge and adjusted when necessary in a routine practice. However, this method results in wide variations in pressure, and adequate management is difficult due to the spontaneous release of air from the cuff, which reduces cuff pressure. In order to continuously maintain a uniform cuff pressure, we developed a new automated cuff pressure controller and compared its properties with existing devices. METHODS: The effectiveness of the new device was assessed with a model trachea/lung and tracheal tube by measuring cuff pressure while on mechanical ventilation. An electrically powered automatic cuff controller or manual cuff pressure control was used for comparison purposes. The effectiveness of the new device was also examined in patients receiving mechanical ventilation by continuously measuring cuff pressure for a 24-h period. RESULTS: Cuff pressure was uniformly maintained with the new device. Moreover, in the clinical setting, variation in pressure from the set pressure was minimal with both the new device and existing device, relative to the intermittent monitoring method. This suggests that, as with the existing device, uniform cuff pressure management is possible with the new device. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the ability of the new cuff pressure controller to manage cuff pressure without the need of a power source, highlighting its potential utility in clinical settings. BioMed Central 2016-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4709876/ /pubmed/26759719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0126-7 Text en © Michikoshi et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Michikoshi, Junichi
Matsumoto, Shigekiyo
Miyawaki, Hiroshi
Niu, Harushi
Seo, Katsuhiro
Yamamoto, Makoto
Tokunaga, Shu-ichi
Kitano, Takaaki
Performance comparison of a new automated cuff pressure controller with currently available devices in both basic research and clinical settings
title Performance comparison of a new automated cuff pressure controller with currently available devices in both basic research and clinical settings
title_full Performance comparison of a new automated cuff pressure controller with currently available devices in both basic research and clinical settings
title_fullStr Performance comparison of a new automated cuff pressure controller with currently available devices in both basic research and clinical settings
title_full_unstemmed Performance comparison of a new automated cuff pressure controller with currently available devices in both basic research and clinical settings
title_short Performance comparison of a new automated cuff pressure controller with currently available devices in both basic research and clinical settings
title_sort performance comparison of a new automated cuff pressure controller with currently available devices in both basic research and clinical settings
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4709876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0126-7
work_keys_str_mv AT michikoshijunichi performancecomparisonofanewautomatedcuffpressurecontrollerwithcurrentlyavailabledevicesinbothbasicresearchandclinicalsettings
AT matsumotoshigekiyo performancecomparisonofanewautomatedcuffpressurecontrollerwithcurrentlyavailabledevicesinbothbasicresearchandclinicalsettings
AT miyawakihiroshi performancecomparisonofanewautomatedcuffpressurecontrollerwithcurrentlyavailabledevicesinbothbasicresearchandclinicalsettings
AT niuharushi performancecomparisonofanewautomatedcuffpressurecontrollerwithcurrentlyavailabledevicesinbothbasicresearchandclinicalsettings
AT seokatsuhiro performancecomparisonofanewautomatedcuffpressurecontrollerwithcurrentlyavailabledevicesinbothbasicresearchandclinicalsettings
AT yamamotomakoto performancecomparisonofanewautomatedcuffpressurecontrollerwithcurrentlyavailabledevicesinbothbasicresearchandclinicalsettings
AT tokunagashuichi performancecomparisonofanewautomatedcuffpressurecontrollerwithcurrentlyavailabledevicesinbothbasicresearchandclinicalsettings
AT kitanotakaaki performancecomparisonofanewautomatedcuffpressurecontrollerwithcurrentlyavailabledevicesinbothbasicresearchandclinicalsettings