Cargando…

Cell wall proteome of sugarcane stems: comparison of a destructive and a non-destructive extraction method showed differences in glycoside hydrolases and peroxidases

BACKGROUND: Sugarcane has been used as the main crop for ethanol production for more than 40 years in Brazil. Recently, the production of bioethanol from bagasse and straw, also called second generation (2G) ethanol, became a reality with the first commercial plants started in the USA and Brazil. Ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calderan-Rodrigues, Maria Juliana, Jamet, Elisabeth, Douché, Thibaut, Bonassi, Maria Beatriz Rodrigues, Cataldi, Thaís Regiani, Fonseca, Juliana Guimarães, San Clemente, Hélène, Pont-Lezica, Rafael, Labate, Carlos Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4709929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26754199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0677-0
_version_ 1782409741499105280
author Calderan-Rodrigues, Maria Juliana
Jamet, Elisabeth
Douché, Thibaut
Bonassi, Maria Beatriz Rodrigues
Cataldi, Thaís Regiani
Fonseca, Juliana Guimarães
San Clemente, Hélène
Pont-Lezica, Rafael
Labate, Carlos Alberto
author_facet Calderan-Rodrigues, Maria Juliana
Jamet, Elisabeth
Douché, Thibaut
Bonassi, Maria Beatriz Rodrigues
Cataldi, Thaís Regiani
Fonseca, Juliana Guimarães
San Clemente, Hélène
Pont-Lezica, Rafael
Labate, Carlos Alberto
author_sort Calderan-Rodrigues, Maria Juliana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sugarcane has been used as the main crop for ethanol production for more than 40 years in Brazil. Recently, the production of bioethanol from bagasse and straw, also called second generation (2G) ethanol, became a reality with the first commercial plants started in the USA and Brazil. However, the industrial processes still need to be improved to generate a low cost fuel. One possibility is the remodeling of cell walls, by means of genetic improvement or transgenesis, in order to make the bagasse more accessible to hydrolytic enzymes. We aimed at characterizing the cell wall proteome of young sugarcane culms, to identify proteins involved in cell wall biogenesis. Proteins were extracted from the cell walls of 2-month-old culms using two protocols, non-destructive by vacuum infiltration vs destructive. The proteins were identified by mass spectrometry and bioinformatics. RESULTS: A predicted signal peptide was found in 84 different proteins, called cell wall proteins (CWPs). As expected, the non-destructive method showed a lower percentage of proteins predicted to be intracellular than the destructive one (33 % vs 44 %). About 19 % of CWPs were identified with both methods, whilst the infiltration protocol could lead to the identification of 75 % more CWPs. In both cases, the most populated protein functional classes were those of proteins related to lipid metabolism and oxido-reductases. Curiously, a single glycoside hydrolase (GH) was identified using the non-destructive method whereas 10 GHs were found with the destructive one. Quantitative data analysis allowed the identification of the most abundant proteins. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlighted the importance of using different protocols to extract proteins from cell walls to expand the coverage of the cell wall proteome. Ten GHs were indicated as possible targets for further studies in order to obtain cell walls less recalcitrant to deconstruction. Therefore, this work contributed to two goals: enlarge the coverage of the sugarcane cell wall proteome, and provide target proteins that could be used in future research to facilitate 2G ethanol production. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12870-015-0677-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4709929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47099292016-01-13 Cell wall proteome of sugarcane stems: comparison of a destructive and a non-destructive extraction method showed differences in glycoside hydrolases and peroxidases Calderan-Rodrigues, Maria Juliana Jamet, Elisabeth Douché, Thibaut Bonassi, Maria Beatriz Rodrigues Cataldi, Thaís Regiani Fonseca, Juliana Guimarães San Clemente, Hélène Pont-Lezica, Rafael Labate, Carlos Alberto BMC Plant Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Sugarcane has been used as the main crop for ethanol production for more than 40 years in Brazil. Recently, the production of bioethanol from bagasse and straw, also called second generation (2G) ethanol, became a reality with the first commercial plants started in the USA and Brazil. However, the industrial processes still need to be improved to generate a low cost fuel. One possibility is the remodeling of cell walls, by means of genetic improvement or transgenesis, in order to make the bagasse more accessible to hydrolytic enzymes. We aimed at characterizing the cell wall proteome of young sugarcane culms, to identify proteins involved in cell wall biogenesis. Proteins were extracted from the cell walls of 2-month-old culms using two protocols, non-destructive by vacuum infiltration vs destructive. The proteins were identified by mass spectrometry and bioinformatics. RESULTS: A predicted signal peptide was found in 84 different proteins, called cell wall proteins (CWPs). As expected, the non-destructive method showed a lower percentage of proteins predicted to be intracellular than the destructive one (33 % vs 44 %). About 19 % of CWPs were identified with both methods, whilst the infiltration protocol could lead to the identification of 75 % more CWPs. In both cases, the most populated protein functional classes were those of proteins related to lipid metabolism and oxido-reductases. Curiously, a single glycoside hydrolase (GH) was identified using the non-destructive method whereas 10 GHs were found with the destructive one. Quantitative data analysis allowed the identification of the most abundant proteins. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlighted the importance of using different protocols to extract proteins from cell walls to expand the coverage of the cell wall proteome. Ten GHs were indicated as possible targets for further studies in order to obtain cell walls less recalcitrant to deconstruction. Therefore, this work contributed to two goals: enlarge the coverage of the sugarcane cell wall proteome, and provide target proteins that could be used in future research to facilitate 2G ethanol production. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12870-015-0677-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4709929/ /pubmed/26754199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0677-0 Text en © Calderan-Rodrigues et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Calderan-Rodrigues, Maria Juliana
Jamet, Elisabeth
Douché, Thibaut
Bonassi, Maria Beatriz Rodrigues
Cataldi, Thaís Regiani
Fonseca, Juliana Guimarães
San Clemente, Hélène
Pont-Lezica, Rafael
Labate, Carlos Alberto
Cell wall proteome of sugarcane stems: comparison of a destructive and a non-destructive extraction method showed differences in glycoside hydrolases and peroxidases
title Cell wall proteome of sugarcane stems: comparison of a destructive and a non-destructive extraction method showed differences in glycoside hydrolases and peroxidases
title_full Cell wall proteome of sugarcane stems: comparison of a destructive and a non-destructive extraction method showed differences in glycoside hydrolases and peroxidases
title_fullStr Cell wall proteome of sugarcane stems: comparison of a destructive and a non-destructive extraction method showed differences in glycoside hydrolases and peroxidases
title_full_unstemmed Cell wall proteome of sugarcane stems: comparison of a destructive and a non-destructive extraction method showed differences in glycoside hydrolases and peroxidases
title_short Cell wall proteome of sugarcane stems: comparison of a destructive and a non-destructive extraction method showed differences in glycoside hydrolases and peroxidases
title_sort cell wall proteome of sugarcane stems: comparison of a destructive and a non-destructive extraction method showed differences in glycoside hydrolases and peroxidases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4709929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26754199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0677-0
work_keys_str_mv AT calderanrodriguesmariajuliana cellwallproteomeofsugarcanestemscomparisonofadestructiveandanondestructiveextractionmethodshoweddifferencesinglycosidehydrolasesandperoxidases
AT jametelisabeth cellwallproteomeofsugarcanestemscomparisonofadestructiveandanondestructiveextractionmethodshoweddifferencesinglycosidehydrolasesandperoxidases
AT douchethibaut cellwallproteomeofsugarcanestemscomparisonofadestructiveandanondestructiveextractionmethodshoweddifferencesinglycosidehydrolasesandperoxidases
AT bonassimariabeatrizrodrigues cellwallproteomeofsugarcanestemscomparisonofadestructiveandanondestructiveextractionmethodshoweddifferencesinglycosidehydrolasesandperoxidases
AT cataldithaisregiani cellwallproteomeofsugarcanestemscomparisonofadestructiveandanondestructiveextractionmethodshoweddifferencesinglycosidehydrolasesandperoxidases
AT fonsecajulianaguimaraes cellwallproteomeofsugarcanestemscomparisonofadestructiveandanondestructiveextractionmethodshoweddifferencesinglycosidehydrolasesandperoxidases
AT sanclementehelene cellwallproteomeofsugarcanestemscomparisonofadestructiveandanondestructiveextractionmethodshoweddifferencesinglycosidehydrolasesandperoxidases
AT pontlezicarafael cellwallproteomeofsugarcanestemscomparisonofadestructiveandanondestructiveextractionmethodshoweddifferencesinglycosidehydrolasesandperoxidases
AT labatecarlosalberto cellwallproteomeofsugarcanestemscomparisonofadestructiveandanondestructiveextractionmethodshoweddifferencesinglycosidehydrolasesandperoxidases