Cargando…
Why do health workers give anti-malarials to patients with negative rapid test results? A qualitative study at rural health facilities in western Uganda
BACKGROUND: The large-scale introduction of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) promises to improve management of fever patients and the rational use of valuable anti-malarials. However, evidence on the impact of RDT introduction on the overprescription of anti-malarials has been mixed. This study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4709931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26754484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-1020-9 |
_version_ | 1782409741955235840 |
---|---|
author | Altaras, Robin Nuwa, Anthony Agaba, Bosco Streat, Elizabeth Tibenderana, James K. Strachan, Clare E. |
author_facet | Altaras, Robin Nuwa, Anthony Agaba, Bosco Streat, Elizabeth Tibenderana, James K. Strachan, Clare E. |
author_sort | Altaras, Robin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The large-scale introduction of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) promises to improve management of fever patients and the rational use of valuable anti-malarials. However, evidence on the impact of RDT introduction on the overprescription of anti-malarials has been mixed. This study explored determinants of provider decision-making to prescribe anti-malarials following a negative RDT result. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted in a rural district in mid-western Uganda in 2011, ten months after RDT introduction. Prescriptions for all patients with negative RDT results were first audited from outpatient registers for a two month period at all facilities using RDTs (n = 30). Facilities were then ranked according to overall prescribing performance, defined as the proportion of patients with a negative RDT result prescribed any anti-malarial. Positive and negative deviant facilities were sampled for qualitative investigation; positive deviants (n = 5) were defined ex post facto as <0.75 % and negative deviants (n = 7) as >5 %. All prescribing clinicians were targeted for qualitative observation and in-depth interview; 55 fever cases were observed and 22 providers interviewed. Thematic analysis followed the ‘framework’ approach. RESULTS: 8344 RDT-negative patients were recorded at the 30 facilities (prescription audit); 339 (4.06 %) were prescribed an anti-malarial. Of the 55 observed patients, 38 tested negative; one of these was prescribed an anti-malarial. Treatment decision-making was influenced by providers’ clinical beliefs, capacity constraints, and perception of patient demands. Although providers generally trusted the accuracy of RDTs, anti-malarial prescription was driven by perceptions of treatment failure or undetectable malaria in patients who had already taken artemisinin-based combination therapy prior to facility arrival. Patient assessment and other diagnostic practices were minimal and providers demonstrated limited ability to identify alternative causes of fever. Provider perceptions of patient expectations sometimes appeared to influence treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS: The study found high provider adherence to RDT results, but that providers believed in certain clinical exceptions and felt they lacked alternative options. Guidance on how the RDT works and testing following partial treatment, better methods for assisting providers in diagnostic decision-making, and a context-appropriate provider behaviour change intervention package are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4709931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47099312016-01-13 Why do health workers give anti-malarials to patients with negative rapid test results? A qualitative study at rural health facilities in western Uganda Altaras, Robin Nuwa, Anthony Agaba, Bosco Streat, Elizabeth Tibenderana, James K. Strachan, Clare E. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: The large-scale introduction of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) promises to improve management of fever patients and the rational use of valuable anti-malarials. However, evidence on the impact of RDT introduction on the overprescription of anti-malarials has been mixed. This study explored determinants of provider decision-making to prescribe anti-malarials following a negative RDT result. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted in a rural district in mid-western Uganda in 2011, ten months after RDT introduction. Prescriptions for all patients with negative RDT results were first audited from outpatient registers for a two month period at all facilities using RDTs (n = 30). Facilities were then ranked according to overall prescribing performance, defined as the proportion of patients with a negative RDT result prescribed any anti-malarial. Positive and negative deviant facilities were sampled for qualitative investigation; positive deviants (n = 5) were defined ex post facto as <0.75 % and negative deviants (n = 7) as >5 %. All prescribing clinicians were targeted for qualitative observation and in-depth interview; 55 fever cases were observed and 22 providers interviewed. Thematic analysis followed the ‘framework’ approach. RESULTS: 8344 RDT-negative patients were recorded at the 30 facilities (prescription audit); 339 (4.06 %) were prescribed an anti-malarial. Of the 55 observed patients, 38 tested negative; one of these was prescribed an anti-malarial. Treatment decision-making was influenced by providers’ clinical beliefs, capacity constraints, and perception of patient demands. Although providers generally trusted the accuracy of RDTs, anti-malarial prescription was driven by perceptions of treatment failure or undetectable malaria in patients who had already taken artemisinin-based combination therapy prior to facility arrival. Patient assessment and other diagnostic practices were minimal and providers demonstrated limited ability to identify alternative causes of fever. Provider perceptions of patient expectations sometimes appeared to influence treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS: The study found high provider adherence to RDT results, but that providers believed in certain clinical exceptions and felt they lacked alternative options. Guidance on how the RDT works and testing following partial treatment, better methods for assisting providers in diagnostic decision-making, and a context-appropriate provider behaviour change intervention package are needed. BioMed Central 2016-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4709931/ /pubmed/26754484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-1020-9 Text en © Altaras et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Altaras, Robin Nuwa, Anthony Agaba, Bosco Streat, Elizabeth Tibenderana, James K. Strachan, Clare E. Why do health workers give anti-malarials to patients with negative rapid test results? A qualitative study at rural health facilities in western Uganda |
title | Why do health workers give anti-malarials to patients with negative rapid test results? A qualitative study at rural health facilities in western Uganda |
title_full | Why do health workers give anti-malarials to patients with negative rapid test results? A qualitative study at rural health facilities in western Uganda |
title_fullStr | Why do health workers give anti-malarials to patients with negative rapid test results? A qualitative study at rural health facilities in western Uganda |
title_full_unstemmed | Why do health workers give anti-malarials to patients with negative rapid test results? A qualitative study at rural health facilities in western Uganda |
title_short | Why do health workers give anti-malarials to patients with negative rapid test results? A qualitative study at rural health facilities in western Uganda |
title_sort | why do health workers give anti-malarials to patients with negative rapid test results? a qualitative study at rural health facilities in western uganda |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4709931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26754484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-1020-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT altarasrobin whydohealthworkersgiveantimalarialstopatientswithnegativerapidtestresultsaqualitativestudyatruralhealthfacilitiesinwesternuganda AT nuwaanthony whydohealthworkersgiveantimalarialstopatientswithnegativerapidtestresultsaqualitativestudyatruralhealthfacilitiesinwesternuganda AT agababosco whydohealthworkersgiveantimalarialstopatientswithnegativerapidtestresultsaqualitativestudyatruralhealthfacilitiesinwesternuganda AT streatelizabeth whydohealthworkersgiveantimalarialstopatientswithnegativerapidtestresultsaqualitativestudyatruralhealthfacilitiesinwesternuganda AT tibenderanajamesk whydohealthworkersgiveantimalarialstopatientswithnegativerapidtestresultsaqualitativestudyatruralhealthfacilitiesinwesternuganda AT strachanclaree whydohealthworkersgiveantimalarialstopatientswithnegativerapidtestresultsaqualitativestudyatruralhealthfacilitiesinwesternuganda |