Cargando…

Bony Versus Soft Tissue Reconstruction for Anterior Shoulder Instability: An Expected Value Decision Analysis

BACKGROUND: One complication of anteroinferior glenohumeral shoulder dislocation is a critical bone defect that requires surgical repair to prevent recurrent instability. However, controversy exists regarding the surgical management because both open and arthroscopic surgeries have respective advant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLaughlin, Richard James, Miniaci, Anthony, Jones, Morgan H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
134
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26779552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115618161
_version_ 1782409776055975936
author McLaughlin, Richard James
Miniaci, Anthony
Jones, Morgan H.
author_facet McLaughlin, Richard James
Miniaci, Anthony
Jones, Morgan H.
author_sort McLaughlin, Richard James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One complication of anteroinferior glenohumeral shoulder dislocation is a critical bone defect that requires surgical repair to prevent recurrent instability. However, controversy exists regarding the surgical management because both open and arthroscopic surgeries have respective advantages and disadvantages. Moreover, it is difficult to determine the patient’s preferred treatment, as factors that influence treatment choice include recurrence rates, morbidity of the procedures, and patient preferences. HYPOTHESIS: Patients who have a higher probability of recurrent instability after arthroscopic surgery will select open surgery whereas patients with a lower probability of recurrent instability after arthroscopic surgery will favor arthroscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A decision tree was constructed to model each hypothetical outcome after open or arthroscopic surgery for glenohumeral instability in patients with bone defects. A literature review was performed to determine the probability of occurrence for each node while utility values for each outcome were obtained via patient-administered surveys given to 50 patients without prior history of shoulder injury or dislocation. Fold-back analysis was then performed to show the optimal treatment strategy. Finally, sensitivity analysis established the thresholds at which open treatment becomes the optimal treatment. RESULTS: The ultimate expected value—the objective evaluation of all potential outcomes after choosing either open or arthroscopic surgery—was found to be greater for arthroscopic surgery than for open surgery (87.17 vs 81.64), indicating it to be the preferred treatment. Results of sensitivity analysis indicated that open surgery becomes the preferred treatment when probability of recurrence after arthroscopic treatment is ≥23.8%, although varying the utility, defined as an aggregate patient preference for a particular outcome, has no effect on the model. When the rate of no complication after open surgery is 97.6%, open surgery becomes the patient’s preferred treatment. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic surgery is an acceptable treatment if recurrent instability occurs consistently at ≤23.8%. This has important implications given the technical difficulty of successfully performing arthroscopic fixation to resolve recurrent anteroinferior glenohumeral dislocations associated with critical osseous defects. However, due to a lack of clinical outcomes studies, more research is needed to better predict the optimal operative treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4710124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47101242016-01-15 Bony Versus Soft Tissue Reconstruction for Anterior Shoulder Instability: An Expected Value Decision Analysis McLaughlin, Richard James Miniaci, Anthony Jones, Morgan H. Orthop J Sports Med 134 BACKGROUND: One complication of anteroinferior glenohumeral shoulder dislocation is a critical bone defect that requires surgical repair to prevent recurrent instability. However, controversy exists regarding the surgical management because both open and arthroscopic surgeries have respective advantages and disadvantages. Moreover, it is difficult to determine the patient’s preferred treatment, as factors that influence treatment choice include recurrence rates, morbidity of the procedures, and patient preferences. HYPOTHESIS: Patients who have a higher probability of recurrent instability after arthroscopic surgery will select open surgery whereas patients with a lower probability of recurrent instability after arthroscopic surgery will favor arthroscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A decision tree was constructed to model each hypothetical outcome after open or arthroscopic surgery for glenohumeral instability in patients with bone defects. A literature review was performed to determine the probability of occurrence for each node while utility values for each outcome were obtained via patient-administered surveys given to 50 patients without prior history of shoulder injury or dislocation. Fold-back analysis was then performed to show the optimal treatment strategy. Finally, sensitivity analysis established the thresholds at which open treatment becomes the optimal treatment. RESULTS: The ultimate expected value—the objective evaluation of all potential outcomes after choosing either open or arthroscopic surgery—was found to be greater for arthroscopic surgery than for open surgery (87.17 vs 81.64), indicating it to be the preferred treatment. Results of sensitivity analysis indicated that open surgery becomes the preferred treatment when probability of recurrence after arthroscopic treatment is ≥23.8%, although varying the utility, defined as an aggregate patient preference for a particular outcome, has no effect on the model. When the rate of no complication after open surgery is 97.6%, open surgery becomes the patient’s preferred treatment. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic surgery is an acceptable treatment if recurrent instability occurs consistently at ≤23.8%. This has important implications given the technical difficulty of successfully performing arthroscopic fixation to resolve recurrent anteroinferior glenohumeral dislocations associated with critical osseous defects. However, due to a lack of clinical outcomes studies, more research is needed to better predict the optimal operative treatment. SAGE Publications 2015-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4710124/ /pubmed/26779552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115618161 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle 134
McLaughlin, Richard James
Miniaci, Anthony
Jones, Morgan H.
Bony Versus Soft Tissue Reconstruction for Anterior Shoulder Instability: An Expected Value Decision Analysis
title Bony Versus Soft Tissue Reconstruction for Anterior Shoulder Instability: An Expected Value Decision Analysis
title_full Bony Versus Soft Tissue Reconstruction for Anterior Shoulder Instability: An Expected Value Decision Analysis
title_fullStr Bony Versus Soft Tissue Reconstruction for Anterior Shoulder Instability: An Expected Value Decision Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Bony Versus Soft Tissue Reconstruction for Anterior Shoulder Instability: An Expected Value Decision Analysis
title_short Bony Versus Soft Tissue Reconstruction for Anterior Shoulder Instability: An Expected Value Decision Analysis
title_sort bony versus soft tissue reconstruction for anterior shoulder instability: an expected value decision analysis
topic 134
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26779552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115618161
work_keys_str_mv AT mclaughlinrichardjames bonyversussofttissuereconstructionforanteriorshoulderinstabilityanexpectedvaluedecisionanalysis
AT miniacianthony bonyversussofttissuereconstructionforanteriorshoulderinstabilityanexpectedvaluedecisionanalysis
AT jonesmorganh bonyversussofttissuereconstructionforanteriorshoulderinstabilityanexpectedvaluedecisionanalysis