Cargando…

Shoulder Arthroscopy Does Not Adequately Visualize Pathology of the Long Head of Biceps Tendon

BACKGROUND: Pulling the long head of the biceps tendon into the joint at arthroscopy is a common method for evaluation of tendinopathic lesions. However, the rate of missed diagnoses when using this technique is reported to be as high as 30% to 50%. HYPOTHESIS: Tendon excursion achieved using a stan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saithna, Adnan, Longo, Alison, Leiter, Jeff, Old, Jason, MacDonald, Peter M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
110
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26779557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115623944
_version_ 1782409778654347264
author Saithna, Adnan
Longo, Alison
Leiter, Jeff
Old, Jason
MacDonald, Peter M.
author_facet Saithna, Adnan
Longo, Alison
Leiter, Jeff
Old, Jason
MacDonald, Peter M.
author_sort Saithna, Adnan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulling the long head of the biceps tendon into the joint at arthroscopy is a common method for evaluation of tendinopathic lesions. However, the rate of missed diagnoses when using this technique is reported to be as high as 30% to 50%. HYPOTHESIS: Tendon excursion achieved using a standard arthroscopic probe does not allow adequate visualization of extra-articular sites of predilection of tendinopathy. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Seven forequarter amputation cadaveric specimens were evaluated. The biceps tendon was tagged to mark the intra-articular length and the maximum excursions achieved using a probe and a grasper in both beach-chair and lateral positions. Statistical analyses were performed using analysis of variance to compare means. RESULTS: The mean intra-articular and extra-articular lengths of the tendons were 23.9 and 82.3 mm, respectively. The length of tendon that could be visualized by pulling it into the joint with a probe through the anterior midglenoid portal was not significantly different when using either lateral decubitus (mean ± SD, 29.9 ± 3.89 mm; 95% CI, 25.7-34 mm) or beach-chair positions (32.7 ± 4.23 mm; 95% CI, 28.6-36.8 mm). The maximum length of the overall tendon visualized in any specimen using a standard technique was 37 mm. Although there was a trend to greater excursion using a grasper through the same portal, this was not statistically significant. However, using a grasper through the anterosuperior portal gave a significantly greater mean excursion than any other technique (46.7 ± 4.31 mm; 95% CI, 42.6-50.8 mm), but this still failed to allow evaluation of Denard zone C. CONCLUSION: Pulling the tendon into the joint with a probe via an anterior portal does not allow visualization of distal sites of predilection of pathology. Surgeons should be aware that this technique is inadequate and can result in missed diagnoses. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates that glenohumeral arthroscopy does not allow visualization of common areas of pathology of the long head of the biceps tendon.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4710143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47101432016-01-15 Shoulder Arthroscopy Does Not Adequately Visualize Pathology of the Long Head of Biceps Tendon Saithna, Adnan Longo, Alison Leiter, Jeff Old, Jason MacDonald, Peter M. Orthop J Sports Med 110 BACKGROUND: Pulling the long head of the biceps tendon into the joint at arthroscopy is a common method for evaluation of tendinopathic lesions. However, the rate of missed diagnoses when using this technique is reported to be as high as 30% to 50%. HYPOTHESIS: Tendon excursion achieved using a standard arthroscopic probe does not allow adequate visualization of extra-articular sites of predilection of tendinopathy. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Seven forequarter amputation cadaveric specimens were evaluated. The biceps tendon was tagged to mark the intra-articular length and the maximum excursions achieved using a probe and a grasper in both beach-chair and lateral positions. Statistical analyses were performed using analysis of variance to compare means. RESULTS: The mean intra-articular and extra-articular lengths of the tendons were 23.9 and 82.3 mm, respectively. The length of tendon that could be visualized by pulling it into the joint with a probe through the anterior midglenoid portal was not significantly different when using either lateral decubitus (mean ± SD, 29.9 ± 3.89 mm; 95% CI, 25.7-34 mm) or beach-chair positions (32.7 ± 4.23 mm; 95% CI, 28.6-36.8 mm). The maximum length of the overall tendon visualized in any specimen using a standard technique was 37 mm. Although there was a trend to greater excursion using a grasper through the same portal, this was not statistically significant. However, using a grasper through the anterosuperior portal gave a significantly greater mean excursion than any other technique (46.7 ± 4.31 mm; 95% CI, 42.6-50.8 mm), but this still failed to allow evaluation of Denard zone C. CONCLUSION: Pulling the tendon into the joint with a probe via an anterior portal does not allow visualization of distal sites of predilection of pathology. Surgeons should be aware that this technique is inadequate and can result in missed diagnoses. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates that glenohumeral arthroscopy does not allow visualization of common areas of pathology of the long head of the biceps tendon. SAGE Publications 2016-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4710143/ /pubmed/26779557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115623944 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle 110
Saithna, Adnan
Longo, Alison
Leiter, Jeff
Old, Jason
MacDonald, Peter M.
Shoulder Arthroscopy Does Not Adequately Visualize Pathology of the Long Head of Biceps Tendon
title Shoulder Arthroscopy Does Not Adequately Visualize Pathology of the Long Head of Biceps Tendon
title_full Shoulder Arthroscopy Does Not Adequately Visualize Pathology of the Long Head of Biceps Tendon
title_fullStr Shoulder Arthroscopy Does Not Adequately Visualize Pathology of the Long Head of Biceps Tendon
title_full_unstemmed Shoulder Arthroscopy Does Not Adequately Visualize Pathology of the Long Head of Biceps Tendon
title_short Shoulder Arthroscopy Does Not Adequately Visualize Pathology of the Long Head of Biceps Tendon
title_sort shoulder arthroscopy does not adequately visualize pathology of the long head of biceps tendon
topic 110
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26779557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115623944
work_keys_str_mv AT saithnaadnan shoulderarthroscopydoesnotadequatelyvisualizepathologyofthelongheadofbicepstendon
AT longoalison shoulderarthroscopydoesnotadequatelyvisualizepathologyofthelongheadofbicepstendon
AT leiterjeff shoulderarthroscopydoesnotadequatelyvisualizepathologyofthelongheadofbicepstendon
AT oldjason shoulderarthroscopydoesnotadequatelyvisualizepathologyofthelongheadofbicepstendon
AT macdonaldpeterm shoulderarthroscopydoesnotadequatelyvisualizepathologyofthelongheadofbicepstendon