Cargando…

Simultaneity and Temporal Order Judgments Exhibit Distinct Reaction Times and Training Effects

A considerable body of sensory research has addressed the rules governing simultaneity judgments (SJs) and temporal order judgments (TOJs). In principle, neural events that register stimulus-arrival-time differences at an early sensory stage could set the limit on SJs and TOJs alike. Alternatively,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthews, Nestor, Welch, Leslie, Achtman, Rebecca, Fenton, Rachel, FitzGerald, Brynn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26756716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145926
_version_ 1782409813765914624
author Matthews, Nestor
Welch, Leslie
Achtman, Rebecca
Fenton, Rachel
FitzGerald, Brynn
author_facet Matthews, Nestor
Welch, Leslie
Achtman, Rebecca
Fenton, Rachel
FitzGerald, Brynn
author_sort Matthews, Nestor
collection PubMed
description A considerable body of sensory research has addressed the rules governing simultaneity judgments (SJs) and temporal order judgments (TOJs). In principle, neural events that register stimulus-arrival-time differences at an early sensory stage could set the limit on SJs and TOJs alike. Alternatively, distinct limits on SJs and TOJs could arise from task-specific neural events occurring after the stimulus-driven stage. To distinguish between these possibilities, we developed a novel reaction-time (RT) measure and tested it in a perceptual-learning procedure. The stimuli comprised dual-stream Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) displays. Participants judged either the simultaneity or temporal order of red-letter and black-number targets presented in opposite lateral hemifield streams of black-letter distractors. Despite identical visual stimulation across-tasks, the SJ and TOJ tasks generated distinct RT patterns. SJs exhibited significantly faster RTs to synchronized targets than to subtly asynchronized targets; TOJs exhibited the opposite RT pattern. These task-specific RT patterns cannot be attributed to the early, stimulus-driven stage and instead match what one would predict if the limits on SJs and TOJs arose from task-specific decision spaces. That is, synchronized targets generate strong evidence for simultaneity, which hastens SJ RTs. By contrast, synchronized targets provide no information about temporal order, which slows TOJ RTs. Subtly asynchronizing the targets reverses this information pattern, and the corresponding RT patterns. In addition to investigating RT patterns, we also investigated training-transfer between the tasks. Training to improve SJ precision failed to improve TOJ precision, and vice versa, despite identical visual stimulation across tasks. This, too, argues against early, stimulus-driven limits on SJs and TOJs. Taken together, the present study offers novel evidence that distinct rules set the limits on SJs and TOJs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4710527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47105272016-01-26 Simultaneity and Temporal Order Judgments Exhibit Distinct Reaction Times and Training Effects Matthews, Nestor Welch, Leslie Achtman, Rebecca Fenton, Rachel FitzGerald, Brynn PLoS One Research Article A considerable body of sensory research has addressed the rules governing simultaneity judgments (SJs) and temporal order judgments (TOJs). In principle, neural events that register stimulus-arrival-time differences at an early sensory stage could set the limit on SJs and TOJs alike. Alternatively, distinct limits on SJs and TOJs could arise from task-specific neural events occurring after the stimulus-driven stage. To distinguish between these possibilities, we developed a novel reaction-time (RT) measure and tested it in a perceptual-learning procedure. The stimuli comprised dual-stream Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) displays. Participants judged either the simultaneity or temporal order of red-letter and black-number targets presented in opposite lateral hemifield streams of black-letter distractors. Despite identical visual stimulation across-tasks, the SJ and TOJ tasks generated distinct RT patterns. SJs exhibited significantly faster RTs to synchronized targets than to subtly asynchronized targets; TOJs exhibited the opposite RT pattern. These task-specific RT patterns cannot be attributed to the early, stimulus-driven stage and instead match what one would predict if the limits on SJs and TOJs arose from task-specific decision spaces. That is, synchronized targets generate strong evidence for simultaneity, which hastens SJ RTs. By contrast, synchronized targets provide no information about temporal order, which slows TOJ RTs. Subtly asynchronizing the targets reverses this information pattern, and the corresponding RT patterns. In addition to investigating RT patterns, we also investigated training-transfer between the tasks. Training to improve SJ precision failed to improve TOJ precision, and vice versa, despite identical visual stimulation across tasks. This, too, argues against early, stimulus-driven limits on SJs and TOJs. Taken together, the present study offers novel evidence that distinct rules set the limits on SJs and TOJs. Public Library of Science 2016-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4710527/ /pubmed/26756716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145926 Text en © 2016 Matthews et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Matthews, Nestor
Welch, Leslie
Achtman, Rebecca
Fenton, Rachel
FitzGerald, Brynn
Simultaneity and Temporal Order Judgments Exhibit Distinct Reaction Times and Training Effects
title Simultaneity and Temporal Order Judgments Exhibit Distinct Reaction Times and Training Effects
title_full Simultaneity and Temporal Order Judgments Exhibit Distinct Reaction Times and Training Effects
title_fullStr Simultaneity and Temporal Order Judgments Exhibit Distinct Reaction Times and Training Effects
title_full_unstemmed Simultaneity and Temporal Order Judgments Exhibit Distinct Reaction Times and Training Effects
title_short Simultaneity and Temporal Order Judgments Exhibit Distinct Reaction Times and Training Effects
title_sort simultaneity and temporal order judgments exhibit distinct reaction times and training effects
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26756716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145926
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewsnestor simultaneityandtemporalorderjudgmentsexhibitdistinctreactiontimesandtrainingeffects
AT welchleslie simultaneityandtemporalorderjudgmentsexhibitdistinctreactiontimesandtrainingeffects
AT achtmanrebecca simultaneityandtemporalorderjudgmentsexhibitdistinctreactiontimesandtrainingeffects
AT fentonrachel simultaneityandtemporalorderjudgmentsexhibitdistinctreactiontimesandtrainingeffects
AT fitzgeraldbrynn simultaneityandtemporalorderjudgmentsexhibitdistinctreactiontimesandtrainingeffects