Cargando…

Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for Prevention

BACKGROUND: The most essential goal of medicine and public health is to prevent harm (primum non nocere). This goal is only fully achieved with primary prevention, which requires us to identify and prevent harms prior to human exposure through research and testing that does not involve human subject...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mandrioli, Daniele, Silbergeld, Ellen Kovner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26091173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509880
_version_ 1782409825447051264
author Mandrioli, Daniele
Silbergeld, Ellen Kovner
author_facet Mandrioli, Daniele
Silbergeld, Ellen Kovner
author_sort Mandrioli, Daniele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The most essential goal of medicine and public health is to prevent harm (primum non nocere). This goal is only fully achieved with primary prevention, which requires us to identify and prevent harms prior to human exposure through research and testing that does not involve human subjects. For that reason, public health policies place considerable reliance on nonhuman toxicological studies. However, toxicology as a field has often not produced efficient and timely evidence for decision making in public health. In response to this, the U.S. National Research Council called for the adoption of evidence-based methods and systematic reviews in regulatory decision making. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) have recently endorsed these methods in their assessments of safety and risk. OBJECTIVES: In this commentary we summarize challenges and problems in current practices in toxicology as applied to decision making. We compare these practices with the principles and methods utilized in evidence-based medicine and health care, with emphasis on the record of the Cochrane Collaboration. DISCUSSION: We propose a stepwise strategy to support the development, validation, and application of evidence-based toxicology (EBT). We discuss current progresses in this field produced by the Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) of the National Toxicology Program and the Navigation Guide works. We propose that adherence to the Cochrane principles is a fundamental prerequisite for the development and implementation of EBT. CONCLUSION: The adoption of evidence-based principles and methods will enhance the validity, transparency, efficiency, and acceptance of toxicological evidence, with benefits in terms of reducing delays and costs for all stakeholders (researchers, consumers, regulators, and industry). CITATION: Mandrioli D, Silbergeld EK. 2016. Evidence from toxicology: the most essential science for prevention. Environ Health Perspect 124:6–11; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509880
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4710610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47106102016-01-20 Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for Prevention Mandrioli, Daniele Silbergeld, Ellen Kovner Environ Health Perspect Commentary BACKGROUND: The most essential goal of medicine and public health is to prevent harm (primum non nocere). This goal is only fully achieved with primary prevention, which requires us to identify and prevent harms prior to human exposure through research and testing that does not involve human subjects. For that reason, public health policies place considerable reliance on nonhuman toxicological studies. However, toxicology as a field has often not produced efficient and timely evidence for decision making in public health. In response to this, the U.S. National Research Council called for the adoption of evidence-based methods and systematic reviews in regulatory decision making. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) have recently endorsed these methods in their assessments of safety and risk. OBJECTIVES: In this commentary we summarize challenges and problems in current practices in toxicology as applied to decision making. We compare these practices with the principles and methods utilized in evidence-based medicine and health care, with emphasis on the record of the Cochrane Collaboration. DISCUSSION: We propose a stepwise strategy to support the development, validation, and application of evidence-based toxicology (EBT). We discuss current progresses in this field produced by the Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) of the National Toxicology Program and the Navigation Guide works. We propose that adherence to the Cochrane principles is a fundamental prerequisite for the development and implementation of EBT. CONCLUSION: The adoption of evidence-based principles and methods will enhance the validity, transparency, efficiency, and acceptance of toxicological evidence, with benefits in terms of reducing delays and costs for all stakeholders (researchers, consumers, regulators, and industry). CITATION: Mandrioli D, Silbergeld EK. 2016. Evidence from toxicology: the most essential science for prevention. Environ Health Perspect 124:6–11; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509880 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2015-06-19 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4710610/ /pubmed/26091173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509880 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Commentary
Mandrioli, Daniele
Silbergeld, Ellen Kovner
Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for Prevention
title Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for Prevention
title_full Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for Prevention
title_fullStr Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for Prevention
title_full_unstemmed Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for Prevention
title_short Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for Prevention
title_sort evidence from toxicology: the most essential science for prevention
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26091173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509880
work_keys_str_mv AT mandriolidaniele evidencefromtoxicologythemostessentialscienceforprevention
AT silbergeldellenkovner evidencefromtoxicologythemostessentialscienceforprevention